IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v60y2007i12p1290-1302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the part worth of the mode of transport in a trip package: An extended Bradley-Terry model for paired-comparison conjoint data

Author

Listed:
  • Hatzinger, Reinhold
  • Mazanec, Josef A.

Abstract

This study measures the travelers' perceived change in utility by accepting one of the modes of transport air, rail, or bus as one component of a packaged city trip. The part-worth values for the trip product elements are expected to depend on a number of traveler characteristics. The predictors hypothesized are city travel experience, general modal preference, socio-economic status, and car ownership. In the survey, the combinations of trip attributes differed between the two subgroups of leisure and business travelers. The leisure travelers rated three levels of mode, length of stay, and price, but only one level of the hotel category. The business travelers were shown four mode alternatives and only two levels for each of the other trip product elements. The conjoint measurements were elaborated by fitting an Extended Bradley-Terry Model. Demonstrating the application of the EBTM is the main purpose of the paper. The EBTM offers several advantages over the more popular versions of conjoint analysis. It correctly treats ties and allows for simultaneous estimation of the trip package ('object') parameters, object covariates (trip attributes), subject covariates (traveler characteristics) and their interactions. For both the business and the leisure travelers, the mode of transport dominated the assessment of a city trip package. For leisure tourists, e.g., switching from train 2nd class to an economy flight boosted the trip package more than twice as much as replacing train for bus. A variation of the package price was much more important for the leisure than for the business travelers. The socio-economic status proved to be an important factor and was particularly influential among the business travelers. In the leisure tourists' sub-sample age was not only important for valuing the mode of transport, but had a preferential impact for all trip components. Finally, the limitations of this demonstration study that discourage extrapolation to city travelers in general are emphasized.

Suggested Citation

  • Hatzinger, Reinhold & Mazanec, Josef A., 2007. "Measuring the part worth of the mode of transport in a trip package: An extended Bradley-Terry model for paired-comparison conjoint data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 1290-1302, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:60:y:2007:i:12:p:1290-1302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(07)00125-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerry Wind & Paul E. Green & Douglas Shifflet & Marsha Scarbrough, 1989. "Courtyard by Marriott : Designing a Hotel Facility with Consumer-Based Marketing Models," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 25-47, February.
    2. Lena Nerhagen, 2003. "Travel Mode Choice: Effects of Previous Experience on Choice Behaviour and Valuation," Tourism Economics, , vol. 9(1), pages 5-30, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nasir Abbas & Muhammad Aslam, 2011. "Extending the Bradley--Terry model for paired comparisons to accommodate weights," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 571-580, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amanda Belarmino & Yoon Koh & Hyejo Hailey Shin, 2022. "Blurred lines: comparing room rates, star-ratings, and user-generated contents for full-service and select-service hotels," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(3), pages 721-742, September.
    2. Srinivasan, V. Seenu & Netzer, Oded, 2007. "Adaptive Self-Explication of Multi-attribute Preferences," Research Papers 1979, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    3. Krieger, Abba M. & Green, Paul E., 2006. "A tactical model for resource allocation and its application to advertising budgeting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 935-949, May.
    4. Bard, Sharon K. & Craig, Dawn J. & Boehlje, Michael, 2002. "Borrower Preferences In The Agricultural Credit Market: A Conjoint Analysis," Staff Papers 28628, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    5. Liu, Yong & Teichert, Thorsten & Rossi, Matti & Li, Hongxiu & Hu, Feng, 2017. "Big data for big insights: Investigating language-specific drivers of hotel satisfaction with 412,784 user-generated reviews," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 554-563.
    6. YiChun Miriam Liu & Jeff D. Brazell & Greg M. Allenby, 2022. "Non-linear pricing effects in conjoint analysis," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 397-430, December.
    7. Paul E. Green & Abba M. Krieger & Yoram Wind, 2001. "Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3_supplem), pages 56-73, June.
    8. Mishra, Sanjay & Umesh, U. N., 2005. "Determining the quality of conjoint analysis results using violation of a priori signs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 301-311, March.
    9. Roland T. Rust & Tuck Siong Chung, 2006. "Marketing Models of Service and Relationships," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 560-580, 11-12.
    10. Jeffrey D. Camm & James J. Cochran & David J. Curry & Sriram Kannan, 2006. "Conjoint Optimization: An Exact Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Share-of-Choice Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 435-447, March.
    11. Armstrong, J. Scott & Brodie, Roderick J., 1999. "Forecasting for Marketing," MPRA Paper 81690, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. J. Scott Armstrong & Kesten C. Green, 2005. "Demand Forecasting: Evidence-based Methods," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 24/05, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    13. Lilien, Gary L. & Rangaswamy, Arvind & van Bruggen, Gerrit H. & Wierenga, Berend, 2002. "Bridging the marketing theory-practice gap with marketing engineering," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 111-121, February.
    14. Germann, Frank & Lilien, Gary L. & Rangaswamy, Arvind, 2013. "Performance implications of deploying marketing analytics," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 114-128.
    15. Amanda Belarmino & Tevfik Demirciftci & Liheng Zhang, 2021. "Online reviews and travel magazine awards: their influence on willingness-to-pay," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 436-445, August.
    16. B. Vinod, 2019. "Hotel retailing with attribute-based room pricing and inventory control," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(6), pages 429-433, December.
    17. Bard, Sharon K. & Boehlje, Michael & Craig, Dawn J., 2001. "Borrower Preferences In The Agricultural Credit Market: A Conjoint Analysis," 2001 Regional Committee NC-221, October 1-2, 2001, McLean, Virginia 132404, Regional Research Committee NC-1014: Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition.
    18. John D. C. Little, 2004. "Comments on ÜModels and Managers: The Concept of a Decision CalculusÝ," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1854-1860, December.
    19. Kolomoyets, Yuliya & Dickinger, Astrid, 2023. "Understanding value perceptions and propositions: A machine learning approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Brian Buh & Stefanie Peer, 2022. "Environmental Concern and the Determinants of Night Train Use: Evidence from Vienna (Austria)," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2022_02, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:60:y:2007:i:12:p:1290-1302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.