IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v115y2020icp122-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market-based drivers of cobranding success

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen, Hang T.
  • Ross, William T.
  • Pancras, Joseph
  • Phan, Hieu V.

Abstract

This research examines the total value impact of cobranding in new product introductions and how the value is distributed between partners. Analysis of 728 cobranded new products in the consumer electronics and packaged goods industries reveals that cobranding does not always create value for partnering firms. In most cases, any value created is distributed asymmetrically between partners. Consistent with resource dependence theory, we find that relative dependencies of partners’ market-based assets (MAs) significantly drive the variance in cobranding value creation and distribution. MA interdependence such as brand, channel, and capability complementarities leads to higher value creation and lesser value asymmetry. In contrast, MA imbalance in terms of brand, channel, and capabilities between partners results in lower value creation and greater value asymmetry. These effects are more pronounced under high market demand uncertainty and competition. The findings offer useful implications for firms looking to build a successful cobranding strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen, Hang T. & Ross, William T. & Pancras, Joseph & Phan, Hieu V., 2020. "Market-based drivers of cobranding success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 122-138.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:115:y:2020:i:c:p:122-138
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320302721
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kartik Kalaignanam & Venkatesh Shankar & Rajan Varadarajan, 2007. "Asymmetric New Product Development Alliances: Win-Win or Win-Lose Partnerships?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 357-374, March.
    2. Brian Boyd, 1990. "Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(6), pages 419-430, October.
    3. Zixia Cao & Alina Sorescu, 2013. "Wedded Bliss or Tainted Love? Stock Market Reactions to the Introduction of Cobranded Products," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 939-959, November.
    4. Ron Adner & Daniel Levinthal, 2001. "Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(5), pages 611-628, May.
    5. Abhishek Borah & Gerard J. Tellis, 2014. "Make, Buy, or Ally? Choice of and Payoff from Announcements of Alternate Strategies for Innovations," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 114-133, January.
    6. Paul Chiambaretto & Călin Gurău, 2017. "David by Goliath: what is co-branding and what is in it for SMEs," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(1), pages 103-122.
    7. Glen Dowell & Brad Killaly, 2009. "Effect of Resource Variation and Firm Experience on Market Entry Decisions: Evidence from U.S. Telecommunication Firms' International Expansion Decisions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 69-84, February.
    8. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1996. "Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(1), pages 55-84, March.
    9. Arnd Huchzermeier & Christoph H. Loch, 2001. "Project Management Under Risk: Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility in R...D," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 85-101, January.
    10. Muller, Edward N., 1970. "Cross-National Dimensions of Political Competence," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(3), pages 792-809, September.
    11. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1992. "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 427-465, June.
    12. Bradley, Michael & Desai, Anand & Kim, E. Han, 1988. "Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 3-40, May.
    13. Xiaowei Luo & Lina Deng, 2009. "Do Birds of a Feather Flock Higher? The Effects of Partner Similarity on Innovation in Strategic Alliances in Knowledge‐Intensive Industries," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1005-1030, September.
    14. Gareth R. Jones & Charles W. L. Hill, 1988. "Transaction cost analysis of strategy‐structure choice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 159-172, March.
    15. Li, Yan & He, Hongwei, 2013. "Evaluation of international brand alliances: Brand order and consumer ethnocentrism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 89-97.
    16. Stock, Ruth, 2006. "Interorganizational Teams as Boundary Spanners between Supplier and Customer Companies," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 60478, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. Christophe Bezes, 2013. "Effect of channel congruence on a retailer's image," Post-Print hal-00861112, HAL.
    18. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    19. Fee, C. Edward & Thomas, Shawn, 2004. "Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 423-460, December.
    20. Bernd Helmig & Jan-Alexander Huber & Peter S. H. Leeflang, 2008. "Co-branding: The Stae of the Art," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 60(4), pages 359-377, October.
    21. Christine M. Beckman & Pamela R. Haunschild & Damon J. Phillips, 2004. "Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 259-275, June.
    22. Sylvain Sénéchal & Laurent Georges & Jean Pernin, 2014. "Alliances Between Corporate and Fair Trade Brands: Examining the Antecedents of Overall Evaluation of the Co-branded Product," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 365-381, October.
    23. Morgan, Neil A. & Slotegraaf, Rebecca J. & Vorhies, Douglas W., 2009. "Linking marketing capabilities with profit growth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 284-293.
    24. Michel Ballings & Heath McCullough & Neeraj Bharadwaj, 2018. "Cause marketing and customer profitability," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 234-251, March.
    25. Kevin E. Voss & Bashar S. Gammoh, 2004. "Building Brands through Brand Alliances: Does a Second Ally Help?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 15(2_3), pages 147-159, July.
    26. Paul Chiambaretto, 2015. "Resource Dependence and Power-Balancing Operations in Alliances: The Role of Market Redefinition Strategies," Post-Print hal-02009509, HAL.
    27. Paul Chiambaretto & Călin Gurău, 2017. "David by Goliath: what is co-branding and what is in it for SMEs," Post-Print hal-02000702, HAL.
    28. Tansev Geylani & J. Jeffrey Inman & Frenkel Ter Hofstede, 2008. "Image Reinforcement or Impairment: The Effects of Co-Branding on Attribute Uncertainty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 730-744, 07-08.
    29. Geoffrey Martin & Remzi Gözübüyük & Manuel Becerra, 2015. "Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 235-253, February.
    30. Yoo, Boonghee & Donthu, Naveen, 2001. "Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, April.
    31. Shantanu Dutta & Om Narasimhan & Surendra Rajiv, 1999. "Success in High-Technology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 547-568.
    32. Wm. Gerard Sanders & Steven Boivie, 2004. "Sorting things out: valuation of new firms in uncertain markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 167-186, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han, Jie & Wang, Desheng & Yang, Zhihao, 2023. "Acting like an interpersonal relationship: Cobrand anthropomorphism increases product evaluation and purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Lixin Sheng & Jibao Gu & Jianlin Wu, 2023. "How does entrepreneurial orientation influence firm performance? The roles of corporate social responsibility and institutional environments," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2021-2036, July.
    3. Vaidyanathan, Rajiv & Aggarwal, Praveen, 2022. "Asymmetric brand alliances: When joint promotions with strong brands hurt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 213-228.
    4. Healey, John & Mintz, Ofer, 2021. "What if your owners also own other firms in your industry? The relationship between institutional common ownership, marketing, and firm performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 838-856.
    5. Hengameh Fakhravar & Hesamoddin Tahami, 2022. "International Co-Branding and Firms Finance Performance," Papers 2202.07128, arXiv.org.
    6. Suzuki, Satoko & Kanno, Saori, 2022. "The role of brand coolness in the masstige co-branding of luxury and mass brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 240-249.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2017. "Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.
    2. Paul A. Gompers & Andrew Metrick, 2001. "Institutional Investors and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(1), pages 229-259.
    3. Puay Khoon Toh & Taekyu Kim, 2013. "Why Put All Your Eggs in One Basket? A Competition-Based View of How Technological Uncertainty Affects a Firm’s Technological Specialization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1214-1236, August.
    4. Geoffrey Martin & Remzi Gözübüyük & Manuel Becerra, 2015. "Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 235-253, February.
    5. Oh, Yoojin & Yoo, Nina, 2022. "Effective cooperation modes based on cultural and market similarities in interfirm relationships," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1).
    6. Imran S. Currim & Jooseop Lim & Yu Zhang, 2018. "Effect of analysts’ earnings pressure on marketing spending and stock market performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 431-452, May.
    7. Deng, Xin & Kang, Jun-koo & Low, Buen Sin, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 87-109.
    8. Carolin Decker & Annika Baade, 2016. "Consumer perceptions of co-branding alliances: Organizational dissimilarity signals and brand fit," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(6), pages 648-665, November.
    9. Nukhet Harmancioglu & David A. Griffith & Tuba Yılmaz, 2019. "Short- and long-term market returns of international codevelopment alliances of new products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 939-959, September.
    10. Cakici, Nusret & Zaremba, Adam, 2022. "Salience theory and the cross-section of stock returns: International and further evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 689-725.
    11. Francesco Busato & Cuono Massimo Coletta & Maria Manganiello, 2019. "Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital: Forecasting Accuracy for U.S. REIT Sector," International Real Estate Review, Asian Real Estate Society, vol. 22(3), pages 401-432.
    12. Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Dam, Lammertjan, 2023. "The contributions of betas versus characteristics to the ESG premium," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 104-124.
    13. Kee-Hong Bae & Junesuh Yi, 2008. "The Impact of the Short-Short Rule Repeal on the Timing Ability of Mutual Funds," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(7-8), pages 969-997.
    14. Brav, Alon & Geczy, Christopher & Gompers, Paul A., 2000. "Is the abnormal return following equity issuances anomalous?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 209-249, May.
    15. Mark Grinblatt & Tobias J. Moskowitz, 2002. "What Do We Really Know About the Cross-Sectional Relation Between Past and Expected Returns?," NBER Working Papers 8744, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Detzel, F. Larry & Weigand, Robert A., 1998. "Explaining Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Financial Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 45-55.
    17. Shaun Bond & Chen Xue, 2017. "The Cross Section of Expected Real Estate Returns: Insights from Investment-Based Asset Pricing," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 403-428, April.
    18. Stefan Nagel, 2013. "Empirical Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 5(1), pages 167-199, November.
    19. Israel, Ronen & Moskowitz, Tobias J., 2013. "The role of shorting, firm size, and time on market anomalies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 275-301.
    20. repec:hal:journl:dumas-00934738 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Fernando Rubio, 2005. "Estrategias Cuantitativas De Valor Y Retornos Por Accion De Largo," Finance 0503029, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:115:y:2020:i:c:p:122-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.