IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intfor/v40y2024i3p881-902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A False Discovery Rate approach to optimal volatility forecasting model selection

Author

Listed:
  • Hassanniakalager, Arman
  • Baker, Paul L.
  • Platanakis, Emmanouil

Abstract

Estimating financial market volatility is integral to the study of investment decisions and behaviour. Previous literature has, therefore, attempted to identify an optimal volatility forecasting model. However, optimal volatility forecasting is dynamic. It depends on the asset being studied and financial market conditions. We propose a novel empirical methodology to account for this dynamism. Using our Multiple Hypothesis Testing with the False Discovery Rate (FDR) method, we identify buckets of superior-performing models relative to the literature’s benchmark models. We present evidence that our proposed FDR bucket with GJR-GARCH has the lowest forecast error in predicting one-step-ahead realized volatility. We also compare our FDR method with two Family-Wise Error Rate model selection frameworks, and the evidence supports our proposed FDR methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassanniakalager, Arman & Baker, Paul L. & Platanakis, Emmanouil, 2024. "A False Discovery Rate approach to optimal volatility forecasting model selection," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 881-902.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:40:y:2024:i:3:p:881-902
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.07.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207023000730
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.07.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:40:y:2024:i:3:p:881-902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijforecast .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.