IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v69y2018icp200-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A neurocomputational model of developmental trajectories of gifted children under a polygenic model: When are gifted children held back by poor environments?

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas, Michael S.C.

Abstract

From the genetic side, giftedness in cognitive development is the result of contribution of many common genetic variants of small effect size, so called polygenicity (Spain et al., 2016). From the environmental side, educationalists have argued for the importance of the environment for sustaining early potential in children, showing that bright poor children are held back in their subsequent development (Feinstein, 2003a). Such correlational data need to be complemented by mechanistic models showing how gifted development results from the respective genetic and environmental influences. A neurocomputational model of cognitive development is presented, using artificial neural networks to simulate the development of a population of children. Variability was produced by many small differences in neurocomputational parameters each influenced by multiple artificial genes, instantiating a polygenic model, and by variations in the level of stimulation from the environment. The simulations captured several key empirical phenomena, including the non-linearity of developmental trajectories, asymmetries in the characteristics of the upper and lower tails of the population distribution, and the potential of poor environments to hold back bright children. At a computational level, ‘gifted’ networks tended to have higher capacity, higher plasticity, less noisy neural processing, a lower impact of regressive events, and a richer environment. However, individual instances presented heterogeneous contributions of these neurocomputational factors, suggesting giftedness has diverse causes.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas, Michael S.C., 2018. "A neurocomputational model of developmental trajectories of gifted children under a polygenic model: When are gifted children held back by poor environments?," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 200-212.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:200-212
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289617303008
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Jerrim & Anna Vignoles, 2013. "Social mobility, regression to the mean and the cognitive development of high ability children from disadvantaged homes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 176(4), pages 887-906, October.
    2. repec:bla:econom:v:70:y:2003:i:277:p:73-97 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lourdes Viana-Sáenz & Sylvia Sastre-Riba & Mª Luz Urraca-Martínez, 2021. "Executive Function and Metacognition: Relations and Measure on High Intellectual Ability and Typical Schoolchildren," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Lourdes Viana-Sáenz & Sylvia Sastre-Riba & Maria Luz Urraca-Martínez & Juan Botella, 2020. "Measurement of Executive Functioning and High Intellectual Ability in Childhood: A Comparative Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kate E Mooney & Stephanie L Prady & Mary M Barker & Kate E Pickett & Amanda H Waterman, 2021. "The association between socioeconomic disadvantage and children’s working memory abilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Claire Crawford & Lindsey Macmillan & Anna Vignoles, 2015. "When and why do initially high attaining poor children fall behind?," DoQSS Working Papers 15-08, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    3. John Jerrim & Sam Sims, 2020. "Grammar schools: Socio-economic differences in entrance rates and the association with socio-emotional outcomes," DoQSS Working Papers 20-11, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    4. Contini, Dalit & Grand, Elisa, 2013. "On Estimating Achievement Dynamic Models from Repeated Cross-Sections," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201343, University of Turin.
    5. David Madden, 2022. "The socio‐economic gradient of cognitive test scores: evidence from two cohorts of Irish children," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 265-290, September.
    6. Laura Outhwaite & Jake Anders & Jo Van Herwegen, 2022. "Mathematics Attainment Falls Behind Reading in the Early Primary School Years," CEPEO Working Paper Series 22-06, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised May 2022.
    7. Marcus Munafò & Neil M. Davies & George Davey Smith, 2020. "Can genetics reveal the causes and consequences of educational attainment?," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(2), pages 681-688, February.
    8. Álvaro Choi & John Jerrim, 2015. "The use (and misuse) of Pisa in guiding policy reform: the case of Spain," Working Papers 2015/6, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    9. repec:cep:spccrp:20 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Emilia Del Bono & Marco Francesconi & Yvonne Kelly & Amanda Sacker, 2016. "Early Maternal Time Investment and Early Child Outcomes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(596), pages 96-135, October.
    11. Samantha Parsons & Lucinda Platt, 2014. "Disabled children's cognitive development in the early years," DoQSS Working Papers 14-15, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    12. Eric R. Nielsen, 2015. "The Income-Achievement Gap and Adult Outcome Inequality," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015-41, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    13. John Jerrim & Anna Vignoles & Raghu Lingam & Angela Friend, 2013. "The socio-economic gradient in children's reading skills and the role of genetics," DoQSS Working Papers 13-10, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    14. Ã lvaro Choi & John Jerrim, 2015. "The use (and misuse) of PISA in guiding policy reform: the case of Spain?," DoQSS Working Papers 15-04, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    15. Zlata Bruckauf & Yekaterina Chzhen & UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2016. "Poverty and Children’s Cognitive Trajectories: Evidence from the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study," Papers inwopa839, Innocenti Working Papers.
    16. Zlata Bruckauf & Yekaterina Chzhen & UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2016. "Education for All? Measuring inequality of educational outcomes among 15-year-olds across 39 industrialized nations," Papers inwopa843, Innocenti Working Papers.
    17. Alcott, Benjamin & Rose, Pauline, 2017. "Learning in India’s primary schools: How do disparities widen across the grades?," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 42-51.
    18. repec:esx:essedp:756 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Nicole Black & Danusha Jayawardana & Gawain Heckley, 2023. "Children’s Time Allocation and the Socioeconomic Gap in Human Capital," Papers 2023-06, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University.
    20. Crawford, Claire & Macmillan, Lindsey & Vignoles, Anna F., 2015. "When and why do initially high attaining poor children fall behind?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121535, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:200-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.