IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v12y2010i3p194-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tool for productivity and cost forecasting of decentralised wood chipping

Author

Listed:
  • Spinelli, Raffaele
  • Magagnotti, Natascia

Abstract

The growing interest in forest biomass has made chipping increasingly popular all across Europe. Many operators have equipped for the purpose, but the large variety of working conditions found in the European forests makes it difficult to correctly estimate the productivity of each specific operation, leading to uncertainty in crucial decisions, such as: operation scheduling, price setting, machinery selection and acquisition. In 2001, the Italian National Council for Research (CNR) and the University of California (UC) developed a spreadsheet freeware capable of returning reliable estimates of chipping productivity and cost, on the basis of user-defined input data. The model is still available from the CNR website and is the object of frequent downloading and inquiries. Such model contains a set of predictive equations derived from the results of 102 field trials, conducted with 30 different machines, under a range of working conditions. In order to facilitate comparison with other estimates and to achieve methodological transparency, the equations are assembled into a simple Microsoft Excel workbook, and the costs are calculated with standard costing methods currently used in Forest and Agricultural Engineering. Since then CNR has continued to work on the subject, with the goal of updating and refining the model. Such work has included 45 validation tests and a separate study on the delay (idle) time typical for different chipping operation layouts. The study was concluded in 2009 and confirms that the model developed by CNR can provide reliable estimates of chipper productivity under a range of operational conditions. Authors believe that such a model can assist European foresters in keeping ahead with the growing biomass sector, thus helping them to seize an important business opportunity.

Suggested Citation

  • Spinelli, Raffaele & Magagnotti, Natascia, 2010. "A tool for productivity and cost forecasting of decentralised wood chipping," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 194-198, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:3:p:194-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(09)00166-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas H. Naylor & J. M. Finger, 1967. "Verification of Computer Simulation Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 92-101, October.
    2. Hartsough, Bruce R. & Abrams, Scott & Barbour, R. James & Drews, Erik S. & McIver, James D. & Moghaddas, Jason J. & Schwilk, Dylan W. & Stephens, Scott L., 2008. "The economics of alternative fuel reduction treatments in western United States dry forests: Financial and policy implications from the National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 344-354, August.
    3. Toupin, Dominic & LeBel, Luc & Dubeau, Denise & Imbeau, Daniel & Bouthillier, Luc, 2007. "Measuring the productivity and physical workload of brushcutters within the context of a production-based pay system," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(8), pages 1046-1055, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Spinelli, Raffaele & Cavallo, Eugenio & Eliasson, Lars & Facello, Alessio & Magagnotti, Natascia, 2015. "The effect of drum design on chipper performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 57-61.
    2. M.R. Ghaffariyan & J. Sessions & M. Brown, 2012. "Evaluating productivity, cost, chip quality and biomass recovery for a mobile chipper in Australian roadside chipping operations," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(12), pages 530-535.
    3. Juha Laitila & Robert Prinz & Lauri Sikanen, 2019. "Selection of a chipper technology for small-scale operations - a Finnish case," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(4), pages 121-133.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chai, Li & Saffron, Christopher M., 2016. "Comparing pelletization and torrefaction depots: Optimization of depot capacity and biomass moisture to determine the minimum production cost," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 387-395.
    2. Günter Küppers & Johannes Lenhard, 2005. "Validation of Simulation: Patterns in the Social and Natural Sciences," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-3.
    3. Baktash, Mehrzad B. & Heywood, John S. & Jirjahn, Uwe, 2022. "Worker stress and performance pay: German survey evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 276-291.
    4. Jacques Fontanel, 1982. "Introduction. Military expenditures and Economic Growth (France, Morocco)," Post-Print hal-03264692, HAL.
    5. Richard E. Nance & Robert G. Sargent, 2002. "Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 161-172, February.
    6. Pachepsky, L. B. & Haskett, J. D. & Acock, B., 1996. "An adequate model of photosynthesis--I Parameterization, validation and comparison of models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 209-225.
    7. Logan, Samuel H. & Shigekawa, Katherine, 1986. "Commercial Production of Sturgeon: The Economic Dimensions of Size and Product Mix," Research Reports 251946, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation.
    8. Pat-Anthony Federico & Paul W. Figliozzi, 1981. "Computer Simulation of Social Systems," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 9(4), pages 513-533, May.
    9. Leroudier, Jacques & Parent, Michel, 1979. "Discrete event simulation modelling of computer systems for performance evaluation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 50-79.
    10. Batas Bjelić, Ilija & Rajaković, Nikola & Krajačić, Goran & Duić, Neven, 2016. "Two methods for decreasing the flexibility gap in national energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1701-1709.
    11. Fraedrich, D. & Goldberg, A., 2000. "A methodological framework for the validation of predictive simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 55-62, July.
    12. Jacques Fontanel, 1981. "Analyse économétrique de l'impact des dépenses militaires sur les variables macroéconomiques," Post-Print hal-03448735, HAL.
    13. Rohit Kapoor & Bhavin J. Shah, 2016. "Simulation model for closed loop repairable parts inventory system with service level performance measures," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 18-42.
    14. Keith Bender & Colin Green & John Heywood, 2012. "Piece rates and workplace injury: Does survey evidence support Adam Smith?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 25(2), pages 569-590, January.
    15. Jacques Fontanel, 1982. "The impact of military expenditure on the French economy," Post-Print hal-03264889, HAL.
    16. Jacques Fontanel, 1981. "L’analyse des conséquences des dépenses militaires sur les principales variables macroéconomiques Les méthodes empirico-heuristiques," Post-Print hal-03448733, HAL.
    17. Hjerpe, Evan E. & Colavito, Melanie M. & Waltz, Amy E.M. & Meador, Andrew Sánchez, 2024. "Return on investments in restoration and fuel treatments in frequent-fire forests of the American west: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    18. Pokharel, Raju & Latta, Gregory S., 2020. "A network analysis to identify forest merchantability limitations across the United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    19. Jones, Kelly W. & Gannon, Benjamin & Timberlake, Thomas & Chamberlain, James L. & Wolk, Brett, 2022. "Societal benefits from wildfire mitigation activities through payments for watershed services: Insights from Colorado," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    20. Ning Nan & Robert Zmud & Emre Yetgin, 2014. "A complex adaptive systems perspective of innovation diffusion: an integrated theory and validated virtual laboratory," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 52-88, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:3:p:194-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.