IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v70y2018icp67-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of the experiences, practices and needs of health promotion professionals when evaluating their interventions and programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Legrand, Karine
  • Minary, Laetitia
  • Briançon, Serge

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the practices of health promotion professionals when evaluating interventions and their transferability and to identify these professionals’ needs in relation to a tool that will guide them during monitoring and evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Legrand, Karine & Minary, Laetitia & Briançon, Serge, 2018. "Exploration of the experiences, practices and needs of health promotion professionals when evaluating their interventions and programmes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 67-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:70:y:2018:i:c:p:67-72
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.06.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917303014
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.06.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saunders, Ruth P. & Ward, Dianne & Felton, Gwen M. & Dowda, Marsha & Pate, Russell R., 2006. "Examining the link between program implementation and behavior outcomes in the lifestyle education for activity program (LEAP)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 352-364, November.
    2. Yuval Ofek, 2016. "Matching Evaluation Approaches to Levels of Complexity," Evaluation Review, , vol. 40(1), pages 61-84, February.
    3. Bonell, Chris & Fletcher, Adam & Morton, Matthew & Lorenc, Theo & Moore, Laurence, 2012. "Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(12), pages 2299-2306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Hoy & Björg Helgadóttir & Åsa Norman, 2022. "Quantitative Measurements for Factors Influencing Implementation in School Settings: Protocol for A Systematic Review and A Psychometric and Pragmatic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Mulhall, Peter & Taggart, Laurence & Coates, Vivien & McAloon, Toni & Hassiotis, Angela, 2018. "A systematic review of the methodological and practical challenges of undertaking randomised-controlled trials with cognitive disability populations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 114-128.
    3. Humphreys, David K. & Eisner, Manuel P., 2014. "Do flexible alcohol trading hours reduce violence? A theory-based natural experiment in alcohol policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-9.
    4. Busse, Heide & Campbell, Rona & Kipping, Ruth, 2018. "Examining the wider context of formal youth mentoring programme development, delivery and maintenance: A qualitative study with mentoring managers and experts in the United Kingdom," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 95-108.
    5. Hatcher, Abigail M & McBride, Ruari-Santiago & Rebombo, Dumisani & Munshi, Shehnaz & Khumalo, Mzwakhe & Christofides, Nicola, 2020. "Process evaluation of a community mobilization intervention for preventing men’s partner violence use in peri-urban South Africa," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Dominick, Gregory M. & Saunders, Ruth P. & Dowda, Marsha & Kenison, Kelli & Evans, Alexandra E., 2014. "Effects of a structural intervention and implementation on physical activity among youth in residential children's homes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 72-79.
    7. Katherine Dowling & Margaret M. Barry, 2020. "Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Saunders, Ruth P. & Wilcox, Sara & Baruth, Meghan & Dowda, Marsha, 2014. "Process evaluation methods, implementation fidelity results and relationship to physical activity and healthy eating in the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 93-102.
    9. Dan Bristow & Lauren Carter & Steve Martin, 2015. "Using evidence to improve policy and practice: the UK What Works Centres," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 126-137, June.
    10. Margaret Dalziel, 2018. "Why are there (almost) no randomised controlled trial-based evaluations of business support programmes?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Russell R. Pate & Rod K. Dishman & Marsha Dowda & Kerry L. McIver & Karin A. Pfeiffer & Dwayne E. Porter & Ruth P. Saunders & Dianne S. Ward, 2022. "A Summary of One Research Team’s Contributions to Understanding Physical Activity Behavior in Children and Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Melendez-Torres, G.J. & Warren, Emily & Viner, Russell & Allen, Elizabeth & Bonell, Chris, 2021. "Moderated mediation analyses to assess intervention mechanisms for impacts on victimisation, psycho-social problems and mental wellbeing: Evidence from the INCLUSIVE realist randomized trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    13. Gyeongcheol Cho & Younyoung Choi & Ji-Hyun Kim, 2020. "Investigating the Unintended Consequences of the High School Equalization Policy on the Housing Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-9, October.
    14. Massazza, Alessandro & May, Carl R. & Roberts, Bayard & Tol, Wietse A. & Bogdanov, Sergiy & Nadkarni, Abhijit & Fuhr, Daniela C., 2022. "Process evaluations of mental health and psychosocial support interventions for populations affected by humanitarian crises," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    15. Wolfgang A. Markham & Alan Dolan & Graham F. Moore, 2021. "A Sociological Framework to Reduce Aberrant Behaviour of School Students Through Increasing School Connectedness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    16. Alia, Kassandra A. & Wilson, Dawn K. & McDaniel, Tyler & St. George, Sara M. & Kitzman-Ulrich, Heather & Smith, Kelsey & Heatley, VaShawn & Wise, Courtney, 2015. "Development of an innovative process evaluation approach for the Families Improving Together (FIT) for weight loss trial in African American adolescents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 106-116.
    17. Hawe, Penelope & Riley, Therese & Gartrell, Alexandra & Turner, Karen & Canales, Claudia & Omstead, Darlene, 2015. "Comparison communities in a cluster randomised trial innovate in response to ‘being controlled’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 102-110.
    18. Warren Pearce & Sujatha Raman, 2014. "The new randomised controlled trials (RCT) movement in public policy: challenges of epistemic governance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(4), pages 387-402, December.
    19. Marieke De Craemer & Vera Verbestel & Maïté Verloigne & Odysseas Androutsos & Luis Moreno & Violeta Iotova & Berthold Koletzko & Piotr Socha & Yannis Manios & Greet Cardon, 2020. "Combining Effect and Process Evaluation on European Preschool Children’s Snacking Behavior in a Kindergarten-Based, Family-Involved Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: The ToyBox Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Ofek, Yuval, 2017. "Evaluating social exclusion interventions in university-community partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 46-55.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:70:y:2018:i:c:p:67-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.