IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v308y2024ics0360544224028342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which coal-fired power units in China should be prioritized for decommissioning?

Author

Listed:
  • Shan, Peng
  • Zhang, Lei
  • Jiang, Shiyan
  • Hou, Xiaochao
  • Huang, Zhihang

Abstract

China's total installed coal power capacity is larger than that of all other countries combined. However, for China to attain its objectives of carbon peak in 2030 and carbon neutrality in 2060, a considerable number of these units will have to be phased out. Therefore, it is crucial to identify which coal-fired power units should be prioritized for decommissioning. This study constructs a stacking evaluation model comprising multiple sub-models, based on the power resource endowment, power generation efficiency, and social responsibility. This model is employed to assess each existing coal-fired power unit in China, with the objective of determining which units should be prioritized for retirement. Additionally, the impact on power supply and heating systems in various Chinese provinces is assessed based on these decommissioning scenarios. The results show that: ① Compared to a single model, the stacking evaluation model developed in this study exhibits higher accuracy and robustness. ② China should prioritize the phasing out of small, inefficient coal-fired power units that do not supply heat and are located in regions with a higher proportion of thermal power generation. Approximately 23.1 % (679 units) of coal-fired power units will need to be retired by 2030. ③ The retirement of outdated coal-fired power units will lead to a more efficient, modern, and healthier Chinese power system. ④ The closure of 679 outdated coal-fired units will not result in a shortage of electricity but will substantially affect urban heating. Northern provinces reliant on district heating anticipate a loss of 516.42 million GJ/year in heating capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan, Peng & Zhang, Lei & Jiang, Shiyan & Hou, Xiaochao & Huang, Zhihang, 2024. "Which coal-fired power units in China should be prioritized for decommissioning?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224028342
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224028342
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224028342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.