IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i12p2988-d1416707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit Evaluation of Carbon Reduction in Power Transmission and Transformation Projects Based on the Modified TOPSIS-RSR Method

Author

Listed:
  • Yinan Wang

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Heng Chen

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shuyuan Zhao

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Lanxin Fan

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Cheng Xin

    (State Grid Economic and Technical Research Institute Ltd., Beijing 102209, China)

  • Xue Jiang

    (Economic and Technical Research Institute of State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Co., Shenyang 110015, China)

  • Fan Yao

    (Economic and Technical Research Institute of State Grid Chongqing Electric Power Co., Chongqing 404100, China)

Abstract

In order to fully achieve energy saving goals, it is necessary to establish a comprehensive evaluation system for carbon reduction in transmission and transformation projects. Subsequently, weights were assigned to these indicators using a combination of the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and the entropy weight method (EWM) through both subjective and objective methods. Finally, the ultimate weights were obtained by applying the principle of minimum information. During the construction of the evaluation model, the rank–sum ratio (RSR) method was introduced into the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for approximating ideal solution ranking. And the Euclidean distance in TOPSIS was replaced with standardized Euclidean distance, effectively avoiding evaluation discrepancies caused by different dimensions. The modified TOPSIS-RSR method was utilized to evaluate and rank power transmission and transformation projects in four regions. By comparing the test values of the two models, the superiority of the enhanced model was confirmed. Furthermore, the GM (1,1) model is used to predict the electricity sales volume of the optimal ranking area. This evaluation model can also be applied to the benefit evaluation of carbon reduction benefits in power transmission and transformation projects in other regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinan Wang & Heng Chen & Shuyuan Zhao & Lanxin Fan & Cheng Xin & Xue Jiang & Fan Yao, 2024. "Benefit Evaluation of Carbon Reduction in Power Transmission and Transformation Projects Based on the Modified TOPSIS-RSR Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2988-:d:1416707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2988/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2988/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lei, Xu & Xin-gang, Zhao, 2023. "The synergistic effect between Renewable Portfolio Standards and carbon emission trading system: A perspective of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1010-1023.
    2. Zare Banadkouki, Mohammad Reza, 2023. "Selection of strategies to improve energy efficiency in industry: A hybrid approach using entropy weight method and fuzzy TOPSIS," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Na Chen & Zeshui Xu & Meimei Xia, 2015. "The ELECTRE I Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 621-657.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharad Singh & Akhilesh Barve & Saket Shanker & Hritika Sharma, 2023. "Confronting Barriers: An Efficacious Higher Education System Implementation in India," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1961-1980, October.
    2. Xiaodi Liu & Zengwen Wang & Antoinette Hetzler, 2017. "HFMADM method based on nondimensionalization and its application in the evaluation of inclusive growth," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 726-744, July.
    3. Xiling Zhang & Xiaoqian Liu & Zeyu Zhang & Ruiyi Tang & Ting Zhang & Jian Yao, 2024. "The Synergistic Effect of the Carbon Emission Trading Scheme on Pollution and Carbon Reduction in China’s Power Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Kong, Mengdi & Ye, Xuemin & Liu, Di & Li, Chunxi, 2024. "Comprehensive evaluation of medical waste gasification low-carbon multi-generation system based on AHP–EWM–GFCE method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    5. Mousavi, M. & Gitinavard, H. & Mousavi, S.M., 2017. "A soft computing based-modified ELECTRE model for renewable energy policy selection with unknown information," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 774-787.
    6. Mingming Zhang & Zikun Yang & Ying Lu & Wenwen Song & Fangting Chen, 2024. "Evaluation of Core Competitiveness of New Energy Industry and Analysis of Obstacle Factors Taking Shandong Province as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Xueyi Wang & Taiyi He & Ke Li, 2023. "Regional Population and Public Services under the Framework of Sustainable Development: Evidence from a Typical High-Tech Zone in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Anderson Kenji Hirose & Cassius Tadeu Scarpin & José Eduardo Pécora Junior, 2020. "Goal programming approach for political districting in Santa Catarina State: Brazil," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 209-232, April.
    9. Narayanamoorthy, Samayan & Pragathi, Subramaniam & Shutaywi, Meshal & Ahmadian, Ali & Kang, Daekook, 2022. "Analysis of Vaccine efficacy during the COVID-19 pandemic period using CSF-ELECTRE-I approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    10. Cheng, Xiu & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong & Yang, Jiahui, 2019. "Does social interaction have an impact on residents’ sustainable lifestyle decisions? A multi-agent stimulation based on regret and game theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Idil Yavuz & Orrin Cooper, 2017. "A dynamic clustering method to improve the coherency of an ANP Supermatrix," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 507-531, July.
    12. Arooj Adeel & Muhammad Akram & Ali N.A. Koam, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making under m HF ELECTRE-I and H m F ELECTRE-I," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, May.
    13. Zhang, Chongchong & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "Impact of introducing Chinese certified emission reduction scheme to the carbon market: Promoting renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. Shuyuan Zhao & Heng Chen & Chengyu Jia & Yinan Wang & Cheng Xin & Xue Jiang, 2024. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Scheme Optimization for Power Transmission and Transformation Projects with the Adoption of Carbon Reduction Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Antonella Petrillo & Pasquale Carotenuto & Ilaria Baffo & Fabio De Felice, 2018. "A web-based multiple criteria decision support system for evaluation analysis of carpooling," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 2321-2341, October.
    16. Weizhang Liang & Bing Dai & Guoyan Zhao & Hao Wu, 2019. "Assessing the Performance of Green Mines via a Hesitant Fuzzy ORESTE–QUALIFLEX Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2988-:d:1416707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.