IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v308y2024ics0360544224024058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A numerical study comparing the performance of a self-aspirating domestic LPG porous burner and that of a conventional LPG burner

Author

Listed:
  • Ranjan, Sushanth
  • Parthasarathy, P.
  • Ratna Kishore, V.

Abstract

The study involves in the design of a domestic two-layer self-aspirating porous burner that operates at a thermal load of 1 kW using liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The porous burner is intended to function within India’s standard domestic regulator fuel inlet pressure of 3000 Pa. For the same thermal load, this work also provides a numerical comparison between the domestic conventional burner and the designed porous burner. For both porous and conventional burners, a full-scale 3D model is developed to calculate the flow, combustion, heat transfer to the cooking vessel, thermal efficiency, and emissions. The combustion process of both burners is numerically computed using a detailed chemical kinetic mechanism of LPG combustion, the San Diego Mechanism (SDM) with 57 species and 268 reactions are used. The porous burner is simulated using a non-thermal equilibrium condition to better calculate the heat recirculation within the porous domain. The self-aspirated porous burner has an equivalence ratio ϕ of 0.75 at 1 kW and an efficiency of 84.2%; conventional burner at the same load had an efficiency of 68%. 10 and 6 parts per million (ppm), respectively, are the measured CO and NOx emissions from the domestic porous burner and 660 and 80 ppm for domestic conventional burner, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ranjan, Sushanth & Parthasarathy, P. & Ratna Kishore, V., 2024. "A numerical study comparing the performance of a self-aspirating domestic LPG porous burner and that of a conventional LPG burner," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224024058
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224024058
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224024058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.