IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v293y2024ics0360544224004249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel TLFD-GA algorithm for multi-objectives optimization of ORC power plants with the effect of pressure drop considered

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qinggang
  • Ming, Tingzhen
  • Chen, Qiong
  • Wu, Yongjia

Abstract

This research introduces a novel TLFD-GA algorithm for the three-level criteria optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power plants. It replaces the non-dominated sorting of NSGA-II with three-level fuzzy decision to simultaneously optimize environmental, thermodynamic, and techno-economic criteria. The algorithm provides direct optimization results without needing additional decision-making methods. Furthermore, the impact of pressure drop in plate heat exchangers is investigated, revealing a proportional relationship between pressure drop and the increment of evaporation pressure. A parametric study on 24 basic and recuperative trans-critical geothermal ORC systems indicates that compensating for pressure drop leads to a 5% decrease in thermodynamic performance, a 20% decrease in techno-economic performance, and a 20–60% increase in heat transfer area per net output power. After TLFD-GA optimization, the saving to investment ratio improves by an average of 4.5% across scenarios. R1270 stands out with a remarkable ratio of 3.13 and 4.32 in medium and high-temperature geothermal reservoirs. Moreover, the proposed TLFD-GA optimization algorithm has demonstrated its superiority in terms of superb convergence and stability when compared to NSGA-II, which suggests its prospective application in the low-carbon and green energy fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qinggang & Ming, Tingzhen & Chen, Qiong & Wu, Yongjia, 2024. "A novel TLFD-GA algorithm for multi-objectives optimization of ORC power plants with the effect of pressure drop considered," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:293:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004249
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224004249
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130652?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O'Sullivan, Michael & Gravatt, Michael & Popineau, Joris & O'Sullivan, John & Mannington, Warren & McDowell, Julian, 2021. "Carbon dioxide emissions from geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 990-1000.
    2. Yu, Zeting & Su, Ruizhi & Feng, Chunyu, 2020. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel power generation system driven by geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Yang, Jingye & Gao, Lei & Ye, Zhenhong & Hwang, Yunho & Chen, Jiangping, 2021. "Binary-objective optimization of latest low-GWP alternatives to R245fa for organic Rankine cycle application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Moloney, Francesca & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Goswami, D.Y., 2020. "Working fluid parametric analysis for recuperative supercritical organic Rankine cycles for medium geothermal reservoir temperatures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2874-2881.
    5. Çetin, Gürcan & Keçebaş, Ali, 2021. "Optimization of thermodynamic performance with simulated annealing algorithm: A geothermal power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 968-982.
    6. Jankowski, Marcin & Borsukiewicz, Aleksandra & Wiśniewski, Sławomir & Hooman, Kamel, 2020. "Multi-objective analysis of an influence of a geothermal water salinity on optimal operating parameters in low-temperature ORC power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Mohan, Sooraj & Dinesha, P. & Campana, Pietro Elia, 2022. "ANN-PSO aided selection of hydrocarbons as working fluid for low-temperature organic Rankine cycle and thermodynamic evaluation of optimal working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Alsharif, Sameer & Sharma, Kamal & El.Shafy, Asem Saleh & Farhang, Babak & Mohammed, Adil Hussein, 2022. "Multi-objective optimizations and exergoeconomic analyses of a high-efficient bi-evaporator multigeneration system with freshwater unit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 699-714.
    9. Song, Jian & Wang, Yaxiong & Wang, Kai & Wang, Jiangfeng & Markides, Christos N., 2021. "Combined supercritical CO2 (SCO2) cycle and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for hybrid solar and geothermal power generation: Thermoeconomic assessment of various configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1020-1035.
    10. Altun, A.F. & Kilic, M., 2020. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of a geothermal ORC power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 261-274.
    11. Le, Van Long & Feidt, Michel & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 513-526.
    12. Li, Huabin & Tao, Ye & Zhang, Yang & Fu, Hong, 2022. "Two-objective optimization of a hybrid solar-geothermal system with thermal energy storage for power, hydrogen and freshwater production based on transcritical CO2 cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 51-66.
    13. Zinsalo, Joël M. & Lamarche, Louis & Raymond, Jasmin, 2022. "Performance analysis and working fluid selection of an Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant coupled to an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    14. Imran, Muhammad & Usman, Muhammad & Park, Byung-Sik & Yang, Youngmin, 2016. "Comparative assessment of Organic Rankine Cycle integration for low temperature geothermal heat source applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 473-490.
    15. Chen, Chaofan & Witte, Francesco & Tuschy, Ilja & Kolditz, Olaf & Shao, Haibing, 2022. "Parametric optimization and comparative study of an organic Rankine cycle power plant for two-phase geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    16. Ye, Zhenhong & Yang, Jingye & Shi, Junye & Chen, Jiangping, 2020. "Thermo-economic and environmental analysis of various low-GWP refrigerants in Organic Rankine cycle system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Wencong & Xie, Shutao & Tan, Jiaqi & Ouyang, Tiancheng, 2022. "An integrated design of LNG cold energy recovery for supply demand balance using energy storage devices," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 830-848.
    2. Zhang, Xinxin & Li, Yang & Zhang, Yin & Zhang, Congtian, 2023. "A method used to comprehensively evaluate dry and isentropic organic working fluids based on temperature-entropy (T-s) diagram," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    3. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Alsharif, Sameer & Sharma, Kamal & El.Shafy, Asem Saleh & Farhang, Babak & Mohammed, Adil Hussein, 2022. "Multi-objective optimizations and exergoeconomic analyses of a high-efficient bi-evaporator multigeneration system with freshwater unit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 699-714.
    4. Hashemian, Nasim & Noorpoor, Alireza, 2022. "A geothermal-biomass powered multi-generation plant with freshwater and hydrogen generation options: Thermo-economic-environmental appraisals and multi-criteria optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 254-266.
    5. Huixing, Zhai & Lin, Shi & Qingsong, An & Suilin, Wang & Baolin, An, 2021. "Key parameter influence mechanism and optimal working fluid screening correlation for trans-critical organic Rankine cycle with open type heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Chen, Heng & Wang, Yihan & Li, Jiarui & Xu, Gang & Lei, Jing & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of an improved geothermal power system integrated with a biomass-fired cogeneration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Shuozhuo Hu & Zhen Yang & Jian Li & Yuanyuan Duan, 2021. "A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.
    8. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycle alternatives for the cement industry using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology and energy-economic-environmental (3E) analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    9. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco L. & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2021. "Thermo-economic optimization of a novel hybrid renewable trigeneration plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 532-549.
    10. Semmari, Hamza & Bouaicha, Foued & Aberkane, Sofiane & Filali, Abdelkader & Blessent, Daniela & Badache, Messaoud, 2024. "Geological context and thermo-economic study of an indirect heat ORC geothermal power plant for the northeast region of Algeria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    11. Xie, Yingchun & Nie, Yutai & Li, Tailu & Zhang, Yao & Wang, Jingyi, 2023. "Flash evaporation strategy of organic Rankine cycle for geothermal power performance enhancement: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 57-69.
    12. Daniarta, Sindu & Imre, Attila R. & Kolasiński, Piotr, 2022. "Thermodynamic efficiency of subcritical and transcritical power cycles utilizing selected ACZ working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    13. Gao, Jinling & Zhang, Yong & Li, Xuetao & Zhou, Xiao & J. Kilburn, Zofia, 2024. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a renewable-based hybrid system for power, hydrogen, and freshwater production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    14. Ping, Xu & Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Xing, Chengda & Yang, Anren & Yan, Yinlian & Pan, Yachao & Wang, Yan, 2023. "Ensemble of self-organizing adaptive maps and dynamic multi-objective optimization for organic Rankine cycle (ORC) under transportation and driving environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    15. Ghorbani, Sobhan & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Dadpour, Daryoush & Delpisheh, Mostafa, 2023. "Parametric study and optimization of a novel geothermal-driven combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PF).
    16. Ping, Xu & Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Xing, Chengda & Yu, Mingzhe & Wang, Yan, 2023. "Investigation and multi-objective optimization of vehicle engine-organic Rankine cycle (ORC) combined system in different driving conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    17. Ping, Xu & Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian & Xing, Chengda & Yan, Yinlian & Yang, Anren & Wang, Yan, 2023. "Information theory-based dynamic feature capture and global multi-objective optimization approach for organic Rankine cycle (ORC) considering road environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    18. Marcin Jankowski & Aleksandra Borsukiewicz & Kamel Hooman, 2020. "Development of Decision-Making Tool and Pareto Set Analysis for Bi-Objective Optimization of an ORC Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
    19. Tieyu Gao & Changwei Liu, 2017. "Off-Design Performances of Subcritical and Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles in Geothermal Power Systems under an Optimal Control Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:293:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.