IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v289y2024ics0360544223033352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno economic analysis of efficient and environmentally friendly methods for hydrogen, power, and heat production using chemical looping combustion integrating plastic waste gasification and thermochemical copper chlorine cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Darabadi Zare, Ali Akbar
  • Yari, Mortaza

Abstract

Fossil fuels harm the environment and deplete resources. This study presents eco-friendly systems producing power, hydrogen, and heat with minimal pollution. Non-fossil sources like plastic waste solve waste issues and provide valuable energy. Thermochemical water splitting is another clean method for sustainable hydrogen production. The proposed systems employ chemical looping combustion in conjunction with PWG (plastic waste gasification) and thermochemical cycle of Cu–Cl (copper-chlorine), leveraging thermal integration between the CLC (chemical looping combustion) and subsequent processes. Comprehensive process simulations using Aspen Plus have been conducted for systems. The results indicated that the most desirable operational conditions for CLC occur when the molar ratio of oxygen carrier to fuel is 2.6. Under these conditions, there is no methane present in the fuel reactor products. Additionally, the thermal and exergy efficiencies of the CLC-PWG and CLC-CuCl cycles are determined to be 77.08/67.62 % and 66.11/61.1 % respectively, and the most irreversibility component for both systems is associated with the air reactor, with a value of 375 kW. Moreover, the hydrogen production rate in the CLC-PWG cycle is higher than in the CLC-CuCl cycle, with 105.6 kg/h compared to 34.6 kg/h, and the estimated lower minimum sale price for hydrogen is 2.8 USD/kg for CLC-PWG.

Suggested Citation

  • Darabadi Zare, Ali Akbar & Yari, Mortaza, 2024. "Techno economic analysis of efficient and environmentally friendly methods for hydrogen, power, and heat production using chemical looping combustion integrating plastic waste gasification and thermoc," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:289:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223033352
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223033352
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ishaq, H. & Dincer, I. & Naterer, G.F., 2019. "Exergy and cost analyses of waste heat recovery from furnace cement slag for clean hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1243-1253.
    2. Tolga Balta, M. & Dincer, Ibrahim & Hepbasli, Arif, 2010. "Energy and exergy analyses of a new four-step copper–chlorine cycle for geothermal-based hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3263-3272.
    3. Wang, Zhe & Fan, Weiyu & Zhang, Guangqing & Dong, Shuang, 2016. "Exergy analysis of methane cracking thermally coupled with chemical looping combustion for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Razi, Faran & Dincer, Ibrahim & Gabriel, Kamiel, 2020. "Energy and exergy analyses of a new integrated thermochemical copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Guangli & Ahmadi, A. & Ehyaei, M.A. & Das, Biplab, 2021. "Energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental analyses of polygeneration system integrated gas cycle, absorption chiller, and Copper-Chlorine thermochemical cycle to produce power, cooling, and hyd," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Temiz, Mert & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2021. "Concentrated solar driven thermochemical hydrogen production plant with thermal energy storage and geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Yilmaz, Ceyhun & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2014. "Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 592-602.
    4. Sun, Xue & Li, Xiaofei & Zeng, Jingxin & Song, Qiang & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2023. "Energy and exergy analysis of a novel solar-hydrogen production system with S–I thermochemical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Yadav, Deepak & Banerjee, Rangan, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of the solar carbothermal and hydrometallurgy routes for zinc production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Ishaq, H. & Dincer, I., 2019. "Exergy analysis and performance evaluation of a newly developed integrated energy system for quenchable generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1191-1204.
    7. Michalsky, Ronald & Parman, Bryon J. & Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Pfromm, Peter H., 2012. "Solar thermochemical production of ammonia from water, air and sunlight: Thermodynamic and economic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 251-260.
    8. Razi, Faran & Dincer, Ibrahim & Gabriel, Kamiel, 2020. "Energy and exergy analyses of a new integrated thermochemical copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    10. Singh, Neeraj Kumar & Kumari, Priyanka & Singh, Rajesh, 2021. "Intensified hydrogen yield using hydrogenase rich sulfate-reducing bacteria in bio-electrochemical system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Jiao, Fan & Lu, Buchu & Chen, Chen & Liu, Qibin, 2021. "Exergy transfer and degeneration in thermochemical cycle reactions for hydrogen production: Novel exergy- and energy level-based methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    12. Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi & Seyed Ali Banihashem & Mahyar Ghazvini & Milad Sadeghzadeh, 2018. "Thermo-economic and exergy assessment and optimization of performance of a hydrogen production system by using geothermal energy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(8), pages 1373-1392, December.
    13. Dogbe, Eunice Sefakor & Mandegari, Mohsen A. & Görgens, Johann F., 2018. "Exergetic diagnosis and performance analysis of a typical sugar mill based on Aspen Plus® simulation of the process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 614-625.
    14. Gollangi, Raju & K, NagamalleswaraRao, 2022. "Energy, exergy analysis of conceptually designed monochloromethane production process from hydrochlorination of methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    15. AlZahrani, Abdullah A. & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2022. "Assessment of a thin-electrolyte solid oxide cell for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    16. Mohsen Fallah Vostakola & Babak Salamatinia & Bahman Amini Horri, 2022. "A Review on Recent Progress in the Integrated Green Hydrogen Production Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, February.
    17. Pashchenko, Dmitry, 2018. "First law energy analysis of thermochemical waste-heat recuperation by steam methane reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 478-487.
    18. Xin, Yanbin & Sun, Bing & Zhu, Xiaomei & Yan, Zhiyu & Liu, Hui & Liu, Yongjun, 2016. "Effects of plate electrode materials on hydrogen production by pulsed discharge in ethanol solution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 75-82.
    19. Zheng, Danxing & Wu, Zhaohui & Huang, Weijia & Chen, Youhui, 2017. "Energy quality factor of materials conversion and energy quality reference system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 768-778.
    20. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Younesi, Habibollah & Najafpour, Ghasem, 2016. "On the exergetic optimization of continuous photobiological hydrogen production using hybrid ANFIS–NSGA-II (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system–non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 507-520.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:289:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223033352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.