IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v35y2010i8p3263-3272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and exergy analyses of a new four-step copper–chlorine cycle for geothermal-based hydrogen production

Author

Listed:
  • Tolga Balta, M.
  • Dincer, Ibrahim
  • Hepbasli, Arif

Abstract

In this paper, energy and exergy analyses of the geothermal-based hydrogen production via thermochemical water decomposition using a new, four-step copper–chlorine (Cu–Cl) cycle are conducted, and the respective cycle energy and exergy efficiencies are examined. Also, a parametric study is performed to investigate how each step of the cycle and its overall cycle performance are affected by reference environment temperatures, reaction temperatures, as well as energy efficiency of the geothermal power plant itself. As a result, overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the cycle are found to be 21.67% and 19.35%, respectively, for a reference case.

Suggested Citation

  • Tolga Balta, M. & Dincer, Ibrahim & Hepbasli, Arif, 2010. "Energy and exergy analyses of a new four-step copper–chlorine cycle for geothermal-based hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3263-3272.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:8:p:3263-3272
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210002033
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kothari, Richa & Buddhi, D. & Sawhney, R.L., 2008. "Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 553-563, February.
    2. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Bolatturk, Ali, 2008. "Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2366-2374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    2. Zheng, Guozhong & Li, Feng & Tian, Zhe & Zhu, Neng & Li, Qianru & Zhu, Han, 2012. "Operation strategy analysis of a geothermal step utilization heating system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 458-468.
    3. Yilmaz, Ceyhun & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2014. "Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 592-602.
    4. Fan, Guangli & Ahmadi, A. & Ehyaei, M.A. & Das, Biplab, 2021. "Energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental analyses of polygeneration system integrated gas cycle, absorption chiller, and Copper-Chlorine thermochemical cycle to produce power, cooling, and hyd," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Sun, Xue & Li, Xiaofei & Zeng, Jingxin & Song, Qiang & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2023. "Energy and exergy analysis of a novel solar-hydrogen production system with S–I thermochemical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    6. Temiz, Mert & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2021. "Concentrated solar driven thermochemical hydrogen production plant with thermal energy storage and geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    7. Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi & Seyed Ali Banihashem & Mahyar Ghazvini & Milad Sadeghzadeh, 2018. "Thermo-economic and exergy assessment and optimization of performance of a hydrogen production system by using geothermal energy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(8), pages 1373-1392, December.
    8. Yilmaz, Fatih & Selbaş, Reşat, 2017. "Thermodynamic performance assessment of solar based Sulfur-Iodine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 520-529.
    9. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Younesi, Habibollah & Najafpour, Ghasem, 2016. "On the exergetic optimization of continuous photobiological hydrogen production using hybrid ANFIS–NSGA-II (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system–non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 507-520.
    10. Darabadi Zare, Ali Akbar & Yari, Mortaza, 2024. "Techno economic analysis of efficient and environmentally friendly methods for hydrogen, power, and heat production using chemical looping combustion integrating plastic waste gasification and thermoc," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    11. Michalsky, Ronald & Parman, Bryon J. & Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Pfromm, Peter H., 2012. "Solar thermochemical production of ammonia from water, air and sunlight: Thermodynamic and economic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 251-260.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    2. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    3. Kothari, Richa & Singh, D.P. & Tyagi, V.V. & Tyagi, S.K., 2012. "Fermentative hydrogen production – An alternative clean energy source," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2337-2346.
    4. Balcombe, Paul & Speirs, Jamie & Johnson, Erin & Martin, Jeanne & Brandon, Nigel & Hawkes, Adam, 2018. "The carbon credentials of hydrogen gas networks and supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1077-1088.
    5. Freida Ozavize Ayodele & Siti Indati Mustapa & Bamidele Victor Ayodele & Norsyahida Mohammad, 2020. "An Overview of Economic Analysis and Environmental Impacts of Natural Gas Conversion Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Adrian Neacsa & Cristian Nicolae Eparu & Cașen Panaitescu & Doru Bogdan Stoica & Bogdan Ionete & Alina Prundurel & Sorin Gal, 2023. "Hydrogen–Natural Gas Mix—A Viable Perspective for Environment and Society," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-38, August.
    7. Kharseh, Mohamad & Al-Khawaja, Mohammed & Hassani, Ferri, 2015. "Utilization of oil wells for electricity generation: Performance and economics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 910-916.
    8. Gholizadeh, Towhid & Vajdi, Mohammad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2020. "A new trigeneration system for power, cooling, and freshwater production driven by a flash-binary geothermal heat source," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 31-43.
    9. Hafizi, A. & Rahimpour, M.R. & Hassanajili, Sh., 2016. "Hydrogen production via chemical looping steam methane reforming process: Effect of cerium and calcium promoters on the performance of Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 685-694.
    10. Hai, Tao & Asadollahzadeh, Muhammad & Chauhan, Bhupendra Singh & AlQemlas, Turki & Elbadawy, Ibrahim & Salah, Bashir & Feyzbaxsh, Mahrad, 2023. "3E investigation and artificial neural network optimization of a new triple-flash geothermally-powered configuration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    11. Lucian-Ioan Dulău, 2023. "CO 2 Emissions of Battery Electric Vehicles and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Coskun, C. & Oktay, Z. & Dincer, I., 2011. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling of geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6358-6366.
    13. Siavashi, Majid & Hosseini, Farzad & Talesh Bahrami, Hamid Reza, 2021. "A new design with preheating and layered porous ceramic for hydrogen production through methane steam reforming process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Aissa Dehane & Slimane Merouani, 2022. "Microscopic Analysis of Hydrogen Production from Methane Sono-Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi & Seyed Ali Banihashem & Mahyar Ghazvini & Milad Sadeghzadeh, 2018. "Thermo-economic and exergy assessment and optimization of performance of a hydrogen production system by using geothermal energy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(8), pages 1373-1392, December.
    16. Fabrizio Ganci & Tracy Baguet & Giuseppe Aiello & Valentino Cusumano & Philippe Mandin & Carmelo Sunseri & Rosalinda Inguanta, 2019. "Nanostructured Ni Based Anode and Cathode for Alkaline Water Electrolyzers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Bhandari, Ramchandra & Subedi, Subodh, 2023. "Evaluation of surplus hydroelectricity potential in Nepal until 2040 and its use for hydrogen production via electrolysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 403-414.
    18. Obara, Shin'ya & Hamanaka, Ryo & El-Sayed, Abeer Galal, 2019. "Design methods for microgrids to address seasonal energy availability – A case study of proposed Showa Antarctic Station retrofits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 711-727.
    19. Bicer, Yusuf & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2016. "Analysis and performance evaluation of a renewable energy based multigeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 623-632.
    20. Matzen, Michael & Alhajji, Mahdi & Demirel, Yaşar, 2015. "Chemical storage of wind energy by renewable methanol production: Feasibility analysis using a multi-criteria decision matrix," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 343-353.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:8:p:3263-3272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.