IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v289y2024ics0360544223032024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A canonical coalitional game model incorporating motivational psychology analysis for incentivizing stable direct energy trading in smart grid

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yifeng
  • Jiang, Aihua
  • Wang, Rui
  • Tian, Junyang

Abstract

While maximizing distributed energy value, direct electricity trading introduces strong interactive features, leading to conflicting interests among users. A key challenge is balancing user benefits and interests to encourage broad and sustainable prosumer participation. Motivation plays a vital role in driving human emotions and behaviors. This study incorporates motivational psychology to design an incentive scheme based on a canonical coalition game (CCG). By analyzing prosumers' psychological changes before energy trading, we develop corresponding incentive models for different psychological stages. The trading scheme must align with these model attributes to attract prosumer participation. Building upon canonical coalition game theory, we assess the feasibility of cooperation among prosumers and propose an edge-end coalitional trading scheme to reconcile conflicting interests. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed scheme satisfies motivational psychology model attributes, motivating active and sustainable prosumer engagement. We further investigate the coalition game model properties, rigorously proving superadditivity and non-empty core, ensuring prosumers consistently receive stable and fair profits. Case analysis reveals the grand coalition effectively enhances global payoffs. Furthermore, the proposed scheme facilitates peak shaving, valley filling, and on-site integration of renewable energy, promoting grid stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yifeng & Jiang, Aihua & Wang, Rui & Tian, Junyang, 2024. "A canonical coalitional game model incorporating motivational psychology analysis for incentivizing stable direct energy trading in smart grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:289:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223032024
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223032024
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Yongli & Liu, Zhen & Wang, Jingyan & Du, Boxin & Qin, Yumeng & Liu, Xiaoli & Liu, Lin, 2023. "A Stackelberg game-based approach to transaction optimization for distributed integrated energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Tang, Hong & Wang, Shengwei & Li, Hangxin, 2021. "Flexibility categorization, sources, capabilities and technologies for energy-flexible and grid-responsive buildings: State-of-the-art and future perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Neves, Diana & Scott, Ian & Silva, Carlos A., 2020. "Peer-to-peer energy trading potential: An assessment for the residential sector under different technology and tariff availabilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Martin J. Osborne & Ariel Rubinstein, 1994. "A Course in Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262650401, April.
    5. Gao, Hongjun & Cai, Wenhui & He, Shuaijia & Liu, Chang & Liu, Junyong, 2023. "Stackelberg game based energy sharing for zero-carbon community considering reward and punishment of carbon emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    6. Wu, Qiong & Xie, Zhun & Ren, Hongbo & Li, Qifen & Yang, Yongwen, 2022. "Optimal trading strategies for multi-energy microgrid cluster considering demand response under different trading modes: A comparison study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    7. Stein, Janice Gross, 2017. "The Micro-Foundations of International Relations Theory: Psychology and Behavioral Economics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(S1), pages 249-263, April.
    8. Chen, Yujia & Pei, Wei & Ma, Tengfei & Xiao, Hao, 2023. "Asymmetric Nash bargaining model for peer-to-peer energy transactions combined with shared energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    9. Hua, Zhihao & Li, Jiayong & Zhou, Bin & Or, Siu Wing & Chan, Ka Wing & Meng, Yunfan, 2022. "Game-theoretic multi-energy trading framework for strategic biogas-solar renewable energy provider with heterogeneous consumers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    10. Jiao, Feixiang & Zou, Yuan & Zhou, Yi & Zhang, Yanyu & Zhang, Xibeng, 2023. "Energy management for regional microgrids considering energy transmission of electric vehicles between microgrids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    11. Long, Chao & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Jenkins, Nick, 2018. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing through a two-stage aggregated battery control in a community Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 261-276.
    12. Papadis, Elisa & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    13. Chen, Yongbao & Zhang, Lixin & Xu, Peng & Di Gangi, Alessandra, 2021. "Electricity demand response schemes in China: Pilot study and future outlook," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hussain, Sadam & Azim, M. Imran & Lai, Chunyan & Eicker, Ursula, 2023. "New coordination framework for smart home peer-to-peer trading to reduce impact on distribution transformer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Cai, Pengcheng & Mi, Yang & Ma, Siyuan & Li, Hongzhong & Li, Dongdong & Wang, Peng, 2023. "Hierarchical game for integrated energy system and electricity-hydrogen hybrid charging station under distributionally robust optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Liu, Jia & Yang, Hongxing & Zhou, Yuekuan, 2021. "Peer-to-peer energy trading of net-zero energy communities with renewable energy systems integrating hydrogen vehicle storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    4. Yan, Haoran & Hou, Hongjuan & Deng, Min & Si, Lengge & Wang, Xi & Hu, Eric & Zhou, Rhonin, 2024. "Stackelberg game theory based model to guide users’ energy use behavior, with the consideration of flexible resources and consumer psychology, for an integrated energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    6. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K. & Yuen, Chau & Smith, David, 2022. "Peer-to-peer kilowatt and negawatt trading: A review of challenges and recent advances in distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. He, Ye & Wu, Hongbin & Wu, Andrew Y. & Li, Peng & Ding, Ming, 2024. "Optimized shared energy storage in a peer-to-peer energy trading market: Two-stage strategic model regards bargaining and evolutionary game theory," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    8. Wang, Zhuo & Hou, Hui & Zhao, Bo & Zhang, Leiqi & Shi, Ying & Xie, Changjun, 2024. "Risk-averse stochastic capacity planning and P2P trading collaborative optimization for multi-energy microgrids considering carbon emission limitations: An asymmetric Nash bargaining approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    9. Lissy Langer, 2020. "An Optimal Peer-to-Peer Market Considering Modulating Heat Pumps and Photovoltaic Systems under the German Levy Regime," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Bidan Zhang & Yang Du & Xiaoyang Chen & Eng Gee Lim & Lin Jiang & Ke Yan, 2022. "Potential Benefits for Residential Building with Photovoltaic Battery System Participation in Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Cheng‐Kuang Wu & Yi‐Ming Chen & Dachrahn Wu & Ching‐Lin Chi, 2020. "A Game Theory Approach for Assessment of Risk and Deployment of Police Patrols in Response to Criminal Activity in San Francisco," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 534-549, March.
    13. Müller, Christoph, 2020. "Robust implementation in weakly perfect Bayesian strategies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. Al-Jabri, Hareb & Das, Probir & Khan, Shoyeb & AbdulQuadir, Mohammad & Thaher, Mehmoud Ibrahim & Hoekman, Kent & Hawari, Alaa H., 2022. "A comparison of bio-crude oil production from five marine microalgae – Using life cycle analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    15. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Robert Matusiak & Marta Paduszyńska & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Green Jobs in the EU Renewable Energy Sector: Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Hitoshi Matsushima, 2019. "Implementation without expected utility: ex-post verifiability," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(4), pages 575-585, December.
    17. Dasgupta Utteeyo, 2011. "Are Entry Threats Always Credible?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-41, December.
    18. Baran Han, 2018. "The role and welfare rationale of secondary sanctions: A theory and a case study of the US sanctions targeting Iran," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(5), pages 474-502, September.
    19. Carlos Pimienta & Jianfei Shen, 2014. "On the equivalence between (quasi-)perfect and sequential equilibria," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(2), pages 395-402, May.
    20. Asheim, Geir & Søvik, Ylva, 2003. "The semantics of preference-based belief operators," Memorandum 05/2003, Oslo University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:289:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223032024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.