IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v71y2017is1ps249-s263_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Micro-Foundations of International Relations Theory: Psychology and Behavioral Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Stein, Janice Gross

Abstract

Almost forty years ago, a small group of scholars drew on cognitive psychology to explain anomalous patterns of behavior by leaders on issues of international security. Although it made significant contributions to theory and research, that scholarship did not diffuse broadly into the field. Drawing on concepts in psychology and behavioral economics, research that uses new methods is now producing a wave of scholarship in international relations exemplified by the work in this special issue. Analysis of the use of prospect theory over the last three decades identifies the scope conditions that enable the predictions of rational choice and psychological theories. These scope conditions motivate the focus on the heterogeneity of decision makers that is at the core of current contributions. Future research will move beyond the now-sterile debate between rational choice and psychology.

Suggested Citation

  • Stein, Janice Gross, 2017. "The Micro-Foundations of International Relations Theory: Psychology and Behavioral Economics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(S1), pages 249-263, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:71:y:2017:i:s1:p:s249-s263_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818316000436/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan Kumar & Yuen, Chau & Morstyn, Thomas & McCulloch, Malcolm D. & Poor, H. Vincent & Wood, Kristin L., 2019. "A motivational game-theoretic approach for peer-to-peer energy trading in the smart grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 10-20.
    2. Matthew Gould & Matthew D. Rablen, 2024. "Are World Leaders Loss Averse?," Working Papers 2024011, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
    3. Pieter Balcaen & Cind Du Bois & Caroline Buts, 2021. "The Hybridisation of Conflict: A Prospect Theoretic Analysis," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Fues, Thomas, 2018. "Investing in the behavioural dimensions of transnational cooperation: a personal assessment of the Managing Global Governance (MGG) Programme," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Marandici, Ion, 2022. "Loss Aversion, Neo-imperial Frames and Territorial Expansion: Using Prospect Theory to Examine the Annexation of Crimea," MPRA Paper 117208, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Miles Kellerman, 2019. "The proliferation of multilateral development banks," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 107-145, March.
    7. Wang, Yifeng & Jiang, Aihua & Wang, Rui & Tian, Junyang, 2024. "A canonical coalitional game model incorporating motivational psychology analysis for incentivizing stable direct energy trading in smart grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    8. Matthew Gould & Matthew D. Rablen, 2019. "Are World Leaders Loss Averse?," CESifo Working Paper Series 7763, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:71:y:2017:i:s1:p:s249-s263_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.