IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v275y2023ics0360544223008058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping microbial dynamics in anaerobic digestion system linked with organic composition of substrates: Protein and lipid

Author

Listed:
  • Rhee, Chaeyoung
  • Park, Sung-Gwan
  • Yu, Sung Il
  • Dalantai, Tergel
  • Shin, Juhee
  • Chae, Kyu-Jung
  • Shin, Seung Gu

Abstract

Considering the energy potential and anaerobic biodegradability, protein and lipid are among the most significant organic components of many biogas feedstocks. Although the two core organics have typical structures, each category has compositional variations according to the source, and thus has different biogas potential and catabolic microbes. Therefore, this study analyzed the characteristics and biogas potential of ten model substrates: casein, gelatin, gluten, whey and pork liver as protein-rich (60.1 ± 42.6%) substrates and glycerol, fish oil, soybean oil, butter and pork fat as lipid-rich (72.1 ± 40.5%) substrates. During the digestion process, the maximum methane production and its production rate were 2 and 1.6 times higher in the lipid-rich group, while the lag phase was >2 times longer in the same group. The microbial community structure, determined by high-throughput sequencing, was clustered depending on the organic majority (either protein or lipid), with minor differences within the cluster. The protein-rich and lipid-rich substrates were estimated to generate energy up to 19910 and 7781.8 kJ/kg, respectively, based on the energy analysis. Overall, the complex biochemical process of anaerobic digestion will be better understood based on the proposed microbial dynamics concerning different organic substrate compositions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rhee, Chaeyoung & Park, Sung-Gwan & Yu, Sung Il & Dalantai, Tergel & Shin, Juhee & Chae, Kyu-Jung & Shin, Seung Gu, 2023. "Mapping microbial dynamics in anaerobic digestion system linked with organic composition of substrates: Protein and lipid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:275:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223008058
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223008058
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Heidarzadeh Vazifehkhoran & Jin Mi Triolo & Søren Ugilt Larsen & Kasper Stefanek & Sven G. Sommer, 2016. "Assessment of the Variability of Biogas Production from Sugar Beet Silage as Affected by Movement and Loss of the Produced Alcohols and Organic Acids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Rillo, E. & Gandiglio, M. & Lanzini, A. & Bobba, S. & Santarelli, M. & Blengini, G., 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of biogas-fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 585-602.
    3. Morten Poulsen & Clarissa Schwab & Bent Borg Jensen & Ricarda M. Engberg & Anja Spang & Nuria Canibe & Ole Højberg & Gabriel Milinovich & Lena Fragner & Christa Schleper & Wolfram Weckwerth & Peter Lu, 2013. "Erratum: Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-2, October.
    4. Vinod K. Gupta & Minsuk Kim & Utpal Bakshi & Kevin Y. Cunningham & John M. Davis & Konstantinos N. Lazaridis & Heidi Nelson & Nicholas Chia & Jaeyun Sung, 2020. "A predictive index for health status using species-level gut microbiome profiling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Diamantis, Vasileios & Eftaxias, Alexandros & Stamatelatou, Katerina & Noutsopoulos, Constantinos & Vlachokostas, Christos & Aivasidis, Alexandros, 2021. "Bioenergy in the era of circular economy: Anaerobic digestion technological solutions to produce biogas from lipid-rich wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 438-447.
    6. Gandiglio, Marta, 2022. "Design and operation of an industrial size adsorption-based cleaning system for biogas use in fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Morten Poulsen & Clarissa Schwab & Bent Borg Jensen & Ricarda M. Engberg & Anja Spang & Nuria Canibe & Ole Højberg & Gabriel Milinovich & Lena Fragner & Christa Schleper & Wolfram Weckwerth & Peter Lu, 2013. "Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Courtney M. Thomas & Elie Desmond-Le Quéméner & Simonetta Gribaldo & Guillaume Borrel, 2022. "Factors shaping the abundance and diversity of the gut archaeome across the animal kingdom," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Xu, Xiaodong & Sielicki, Krzysztof & Min, Jiakang & Li, Jiaxin & Hao, Chuncheng & Wen, Xin & Chen, Xuecheng & Mijowska, Ewa, 2022. "One-step converting biowaste wolfberry fruits into hierarchical porous carbon and its application for high-performance supercapacitors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 187-195.
    3. González-Arias, Judith & González-Castaño, Miriam & Sánchez, Marta Elena & Cara-Jiménez, Jorge & Arellano-García, Harvey, 2022. "Valorization of biomass-derived CO2 residues with Cu-MnOx catalysts for RWGS reaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 443-451.
    4. Ding, Xiaoyi & Lv, Xiaojing & Weng, Yiwu, 2019. "Coupling effect of operating parameters on performance of a biogas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine hybrid system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    5. Ingrao, Carlo & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Adamczyk, Janusz & Ferrante, Valentina & Messineo, Antonio & Huisingh, Donald, 2019. "Investigating energy and environmental issues of agro-biogas derived energy systems: A comprehensive review of Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 296-307.
    6. Marcin Dębowski & Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Anna Nowicka & Magda Dudek, 2024. "Optimisation of Biogas Production in the Co-Digestion of Pre-Hydrodynamically Cavitated Aerobic Granular Sludge with Waste Fats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Joanna Berlowska & Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska & Maria Balcerek & Weronika Cieciura & Sebastian Borowski & Dorota Kregiel, 2017. "Integrated Bioethanol Fermentation/Anaerobic Digestion for Valorization of Sugar Beet Pulp," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Marta Gandiglio & Fabrizio De Sario & Andrea Lanzini & Silvia Bobba & Massimo Santarelli & Gian Andrea Blengini, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Biogas-Fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Integrated in a Wastewater Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, April.
    9. Joana Silva & Rita Fragoso, 2023. "Enhanced Biomethanation: The Impact of Incorporating Fish Waste on the Co-Digestion of Pig Slurry and Orange Pomace," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Alexandros Eftaxias & Evangelia Anna Passa & Christos Michailidis & Christodoulos Daoutis & Apostolos Kantartzis & Vasileios Diamantis, 2022. "Residual Forest Biomass in Pinus Stands: Accumulation and Biogas Production Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    11. Khaled M. A. Salim & Ruhanita Maelah & Hawa Hishamuddin & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, 2022. "Two Decades of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs): A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Logan, Mohanakrishnan & Tan, Lea Chua & Nzeteu, Corine Orline & Lens, Piet N.L., 2023. "Effect of selenate on treatment of glycerol containing wastewater in UASB reactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 97-110.
    13. Al-Khori, Khalid & Bicer, Yusuf & Koç, Muammer, 2021. "Comparative techno-economic assessment of integrated PV-SOFC and PV-Battery hybrid system for natural gas processing plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. Çalışır, Duran & Ekici, Selcuk & Midilli, Adnan & Karakoc, T. Hikmet, 2023. "Benchmarking environmental impacts of power groups used in a designed UAV: Hybrid hydrogen fuel cell system versus lithium-polymer battery drive system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    15. Xu, Fuqing & Okopi, Solomon Inalegwu & Jiang, Yongmei & Chen, Zhou & Meng, Liyun & Li, Yebo & Sun, Weimin & Li, Chaokun, 2022. "Multi-criteria assessment of food waste and waste paper anaerobic co-digestion: Effects of inoculation ratio, total solids content, and feedstock composition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 40-50.
    16. Mads Ujarak Sieborg & Brian Dahl Jønson & Søren Ugilt Larsen & Ali Heidarzadeh Vazifehkhoran & Jin Mi Triolo, 2020. "Co-Ensiling of Wheat Straw as an Alternative Pre-Treatment to Chemical, Hydrothermal and Mechanical Methods for Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Sica, Daniela & Esposito, Benedetta & Supino, Stefania & Malandrino, Ornella & Sessa, Maria Rosaria, 2023. "Biogas-based systems: An opportunity towards a post-fossil and circular economy perspective in Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Qi Su & Qin Liu & Raphaela Iris Lau & Jingwan Zhang & Zhilu Xu & Yun Kit Yeoh & Thomas W. H. Leung & Whitney Tang & Lin Zhang & Jessie Q. Y. Liang & Yuk Kam Yau & Jiaying Zheng & Chengyu Liu & Mengjin, 2022. "Faecal microbiome-based machine learning for multi-class disease diagnosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    19. Yilin Shen & Yantao Yang & Lei Song & Tingzhou Lei, 2024. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Power Generation System Based on Life Cycle Assessment—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Yang, JiaJun & Yan, Dong & Huang, Wei & Li, Jun & Pu, Jian & Chi, Bo & Jian, Li, 2018. "Improvement on durability and thermal cycle performance for solid oxide fuel cell stack with external manifold structure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 903-913.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:275:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223008058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.