IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i5p368-d70152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Variability of Biogas Production from Sugar Beet Silage as Affected by Movement and Loss of the Produced Alcohols and Organic Acids

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Heidarzadeh Vazifehkhoran

    (Institute of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M 5230, Denmark)

  • Jin Mi Triolo

    (Institute of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M 5230, Denmark)

  • Søren Ugilt Larsen

    (Danish Technological Institute, Agro Food Park 15, Skejby, Aarhus N 8200, Denmark)

  • Kasper Stefanek

    (HedeDanmark, Jens Juuls Vej 16, Viby 8260, Denmark)

  • Sven G. Sommer

    (Institute of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M 5230, Denmark)

Abstract

The biochemical methane potential and composition of sugar beet pulp silage were investigated using samples taken from six different depths in both open and closed silos (height 3.6 m). The biochemical methane potential (BMP) of pulp silage in open silos ranged from 337 to 420 normal litre (NL) CH 4 /kg volatile solids (VS), while the BMP of pulp silage in closed silos varied between 411 and 451 NL CH 4 /kg VS. The biochemical methane potential peaked at a depth of 1.45 m with 420 NL CH 4 /kg VS for open silos and 451 NL CH 4 /kg VS for closed silos. The ethanol concentration and biochemical methane potential showed the same trend with depth throughout the silos. The energy loss correlated to the loss of volatile solids, and the depths described a linear relationship between them for both the open and closed silos (R 2 = 0.997 for the open silo and R 2 = 0.991 for the closed silo). The energy potentials and composition of beet pulp silage were highly stratified and there was a risk that the silage samples were not representative in investigations of biomass quality for energy production.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Heidarzadeh Vazifehkhoran & Jin Mi Triolo & Søren Ugilt Larsen & Kasper Stefanek & Sven G. Sommer, 2016. "Assessment of the Variability of Biogas Production from Sugar Beet Silage as Affected by Movement and Loss of the Produced Alcohols and Organic Acids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:5:p:368-:d:70152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/5/368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/5/368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Münster, Marie & Meibom, Peter, 2011. "Optimization of use of waste in the future energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1612-1622.
    2. Mshandete, Anthony & Björnsson, Lovisa & Kivaisi, Amelia K. & Rubindamayugi, M.S.T. & Mattiasson, Bo, 2006. "Effect of particle size on biogas yield from sisal fibre waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2385-2392.
    3. Juul, Nina & Meibom, Peter, 2011. "Optimal configuration of an integrated power and transport system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3523-3530.
    4. Bruni, Emiliano & Jensen, Anders Peter & Pedersen, Erik Silkjær & Angelidaki, Irini, 2010. "Anaerobic digestion of maize focusing on variety, harvest time and pretreatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2212-2217, July.
    5. Boie, Inga & Fernandes, Camila & Frías, Pablo & Klobasa, Marian, 2014. "Efficient strategies for the integration of renewable energy into future energy infrastructures in Europe – An analysis based on transnational modeling and case studies for nine European regions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 170-185.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreas Otto Wagner & Nina Lackner & Mira Mutschlechner & Eva Maria Prem & Rudolf Markt & Paul Illmer, 2018. "Biological Pretreatment Strategies for Second-Generation Lignocellulosic Resources to Enhance Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Joanna Berlowska & Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska & Maria Balcerek & Weronika Cieciura & Sebastian Borowski & Dorota Kregiel, 2017. "Integrated Bioethanol Fermentation/Anaerobic Digestion for Valorization of Sugar Beet Pulp," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Mads Ujarak Sieborg & Brian Dahl Jønson & Søren Ugilt Larsen & Ali Heidarzadeh Vazifehkhoran & Jin Mi Triolo, 2020. "Co-Ensiling of Wheat Straw as an Alternative Pre-Treatment to Chemical, Hydrothermal and Mechanical Methods for Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Natalia Mioduszewska & Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Krzysztof Pilarski & Mariusz Adamski, 2020. "The Influence of the Process of Sugar Beet Storage on Its Biochemical Methane Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Rhee, Chaeyoung & Park, Sung-Gwan & Yu, Sung Il & Dalantai, Tergel & Shin, Juhee & Chae, Kyu-Jung & Shin, Seung Gu, 2023. "Mapping microbial dynamics in anaerobic digestion system linked with organic composition of substrates: Protein and lipid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathaniel Sawyerr & Cristina Trois & Tilahun Workneh & Vincent Okudoh, 2019. "An Overview of Biogas Production: Fundamentals, Applications and Future Research," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 105-116.
    2. Hedegaard, Karsten & Ravn, Hans & Juul, Nina & Meibom, Peter, 2012. "Effects of electric vehicles on power systems in Northern Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 356-368.
    3. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Maria Taljegard & Lisa Göransson & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson, 2021. "To Represent Electric Vehicles in Electricity Systems Modelling—Aggregated Vehicle Representation vs. Individual Driving Profiles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Zhang, Qi & Mclellan, Benjamin C. & Tezuka, Tetsuo & Ishihara, Keiichi N., 2013. "A methodology for economic and environmental analysis of electric vehicles with different operational conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 118-127.
    6. Karlsson, Kenneth B. & Petrović, Stefan N. & Næraa, Rikke, 2016. "Heat supply planning for the ecological housing community Munksøgård," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1733-1747.
    7. Juul, Nina, 2012. "Battery prices and capacity sensitivity: Electric drive vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 403-410.
    8. Wang, Yongli & Li, Jiapu & Wang, Shuo & Yang, Jiale & Qi, Chengyuan & Guo, Hongzhen & Liu, Ximei & Zhang, Hongqing, 2020. "Operational optimization of wastewater reuse integrated energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Fernandez, Helen Coarita & Buffiere, Pierre & Bayard, Rémy, 2022. "Understanding the role of mechanical pretreatment before anaerobic digestion: Lab-scale investigations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 193-203.
    10. Sadi, M. & Arabkoohsar, A., 2019. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a combined solar-waste driven power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 883-893.
    11. Batidzirai, B. & Mignot, A.P.R. & Schakel, W.B. & Junginger, H.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2013. "Biomass torrefaction technology: Techno-economic status and future prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-214.
    12. Korberg, Andrei David & Skov, Iva Ridjan & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2020. "The role of biogas and biogas-derived fuels in a 100% renewable energy system in Denmark," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Mika Fabricius & Daniel Øland Tarp & Thomas Wehl Rasmussen & Ahmad Arabkoohsar, 2020. "Utilization of Excess Production of Waste-Fired CHP Plants for District Cooling Supply, an Effective Solution for a Serious Challenge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Costa, J.C. & Oliveira, J.V. & Alves, M.M., 2016. "Response surface design to study the influence of inoculum, particle size and inoculum to substrate ratio on the methane production from Ulex sp," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB), pages 1071-1077.
    15. Marques, António Cardoso & Fuinhas, José Alberto & Menegaki, Angeliki N., 2014. "Interactions between electricity generation sources and economic activity in Greece: A VECM approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 34-46.
    16. Akroum-Amrouche, Dahbia & Abdi, Nadia & Lounici, Hakim & Mameri, Nabil, 2011. "Effect of physico-chemical parameters on biohydrogen production and growth characteristics by batch culture of Rhodobacter sphaeroides CIP 60.6," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2130-2135, June.
    17. Bellekom, Sandra & Benders, René & Pelgröm, Steef & Moll, Henk, 2012. "Electric cars and wind energy: Two problems, one solution? A study to combine wind energy and electric cars in 2020 in The Netherlands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 859-866.
    18. Antonio Colmenar-Santos & Elisabet Palomo-Torrejón & Enrique Rosales-Asensio & David Borge-Diez, 2018. "Measures to Remove Geothermal Energy Barriers in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-29, November.
    19. Hossein Nami & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam & Ahmad Arabkoohsar & Amir Reza Razmi, 2020. "4E Analyses of a Hybrid Waste-Driven CHP–ORC Plant with Flue Gas Condensation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Mathiesen, B.V. & Lund, H. & Connolly, D. & Wenzel, H. & Østergaard, P.A. & Möller, B. & Nielsen, S. & Ridjan, I. & Karnøe, P. & Sperling, K. & Hvelplund, F.K., 2015. "Smart Energy Systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and transport solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 139-154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:5:p:368-:d:70152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.