IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v246y2022ics0360544222002134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic and economic sensitivity analyses of a geothermal-based trigeneration system; performance enhancement through determining the best zeotropic working fluid

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Fei
  • Yang, Changjin
  • Li, Biao
  • Silang, Yangji
  • Zhu, Yuhui
  • Farkoush, Saeid Gholami

Abstract

In this paper, a novel geothermal-based trigeneration system producing electricity, cooling, and freshwater is devised. The whole setup comprises a flash-binary geothermal cycle, an ejector refrigeration cycle, a dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle, and a reverse osmosis unit. In the dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle, the utilization of the zeotropic mixture is examined for performance improvement. The overall system is analyzed from energy, exergy, and economic viewpoints. Likewise, the system is inspected by the thermodynamic and economic sensitivity analyses based on the best working fluid. By specifying the Butene/Isopentane zeotropic mixture as the best working fluid, it is revealed that from 10932kW of the input exergy to the system, 5561.74kW is destructed within different components. In this way, the recovered exergy rate by net output electricity is equal to 3633.33kW, by cooling load is 1663.44kW, and by freshwater is 104kW. Also, the optimum net output power and total energy and exergy efficiencies were obtained to be 3.65 MW, 25.06%, and 35.06%, correspondingly. In this situation, the sum unit cost of products and payback period of the system were 14.50 $.GJ−1 and 3.66 years, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Fei & Yang, Changjin & Li, Biao & Silang, Yangji & Zhu, Yuhui & Farkoush, Saeid Gholami, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic sensitivity analyses of a geothermal-based trigeneration system; performance enhancement through determining the best zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:246:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222002134
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222002134
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    2. Gholizadeh, Towhid & Vajdi, Mohammad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2020. "A new trigeneration system for power, cooling, and freshwater production driven by a flash-binary geothermal heat source," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 31-43.
    3. Farzad Hamrang & Afshar Shokri & S. M. Seyed Mahmoudi & Biuk Ehghaghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2020. "Performance Analysis of a New Electricity and Freshwater Production System Based on an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and Multi-Effect Desalination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, September.
    4. Haghghi, Maghsoud Abdollahi & Mohammadi, Zahra & Pesteei, Seyed Mehdi & Chitsaz, Ata & Parham, Kiyan, 2020. "Exergoeconomic evaluation of a system driven by parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power generation; a case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    6. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Effects of heat source temperature and mixture composition on the combined superiority of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle and zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 436-449.
    7. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Eshaghi, Soroush & Hamrang, Farzad, 2021. "An innovative techno-economic analysis for the selection of an integrated ejector system in the flare gas recovery of a refinery plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. Ahmadi, Samareh & Ghaebi, Hadi & Shokri, Afshar, 2019. "A comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of a novel CHP system based on SOFC and APC cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Gao, Mengyao & Shah, Kinjal J. & Zheng, Jianming & Pei, Si-Lu & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2019. "Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 19-32.
    11. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Bolatturk, Ali, 2008. "Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2366-2374.
    12. Zhou, Yuhong & Li, Shanshan & Sun, Lei & Zhao, Shupeng & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2020. "Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    13. Mokarram, N. Hassani & Mosaffa, A.H., 2018. "A comparative study and optimization of enhanced integrated geothermal flash and Kalina cycles: A thermoeconomic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 111-125.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ranjbar Hasani, Mohammad & Nedaei, Navid & Assareh, Ehsanolah & Alirahmi, Seyed Mojtaba, 2023. "Thermo-economic appraisal and operating fluid selection of geothermal-driven ORC configurations integrated with PEM electrolyzer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    2. Kelem, Ummu Rumeysa & Yilmaz, Fatih, 2024. "An innovative geothermal based multigeneration plant: Thermodynamic and economic assessment for sustainable outputs with compressed hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    3. Bai, Hao & Luo, ShiHao & Zhao, Xijie & Zhao, Gen & Gao, Yang, 2022. "Comprehensive assessment of a green cogeneration system based on compressed air energy storage (CAES) and zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    4. Feng, Yong-qiang & Wang, Yu & Yao, Lin & Xu, Jing-wei & Zhang, Fei-yang & He, Zhi-xia & Wang, Qian & Ma, Jian-long, 2023. "Parametric analysis and thermal-economical optimization of a parallel dual pressure evaporation and two stage regenerative organic Rankine cycle using mixture working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    5. R.V., Rohit & R., Vipin Raj & Kiplangat, Dennis C. & R., Veena & Jose, Rajan & Pradeepkumar, A.P. & Kumar, K. Satheesh, 2023. "Tracing the evolution and charting the future of geothermal energy research and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Ying & Liu, Yuxuan & Nam, Eun-Young & Zhang, Yang & Dahlak, Aida, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of an integrated double-flash-binary geothermal system and dual-pressure ORC using zeotropic mixtures; multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Zhang, Mingming & Timoshin, Anton & Al-Ammar, Essam A. & Sillanpaa, Mika & Zhang, Guiju, 2023. "Power, cooling, freshwater, and hydrogen production system from a new integrated system working with the zeotropic mixture, using a flash-binary geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    3. Zhou, Xiao & Cai, Yangchao & Li, Xuetao, 2024. "Process arrangement and multi-aspect study of a novel environmentally-friendly multigeneration plant relying on a geothermal-based plant combined with the goswami cycle booted by kalina and desalinati," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    4. Zhou, Yuhong & Li, Shanshan & Sun, Lei & Zhao, Shupeng & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2020. "Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    5. Bai, Hao & Luo, ShiHao & Zhao, Xijie & Zhao, Gen & Gao, Yang, 2022. "Comprehensive assessment of a green cogeneration system based on compressed air energy storage (CAES) and zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    6. Lv, Xuefei & Lv, Ying & Zhu, Yiping, 2023. "Multi-variable study and MOPSO-based multi-objective optimization of a novel cogeneration plant using biomass fuel and geothermal energy: A complementary hybrid design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    7. Teng, Su & Hamrang, Farzad & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2021. "Economic performance assessment of a novel combined power generation cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Dou, Zhenhai & Zou, Yunhe & Mohebbi, Amir, 2024. "Design and multi-aspect analysis of a geothermal and biomass dual-source power, cooling, heating, and hybrid freshwater production system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    9. Gholizadeh, Towhid & Vajdi, Mohammad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2020. "A new trigeneration system for power, cooling, and freshwater production driven by a flash-binary geothermal heat source," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 31-43.
    10. Su, Dawei, 2022. "Comprehensive thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses and multi-objective optimization of a compressed air energy storage hybridized with a parabolic trough solar collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    11. Cao, Yan & Mihardjo, Leonardus WW. & Dahari, Mahidzal & Ghaebi, Hadi & Parikhani, Towhid & Mohamed, Abdeliazim Mustafa, 2021. "An innovative double-flash binary cogeneration cooling and power (CCP) system: Thermodynamic evaluation and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    12. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    13. Liu, Xiaoliang & Ma, Lianghua & Liu, Haoyang & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2024. "Assessment of a sustainable power generation system utilizing supercritical carbon dioxide working fluid: Thermodynamic, economic, and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    14. Liu, Xianglong & Hu, Guang & Zeng, Zhi, 2023. "Performance characterization and multi-objective optimization of integrating a biomass-fueled brayton cycle, a kalina cycle, and an organic rankine cycle with a claude hydrogen liquefaction cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    15. Chen, Heng & Alzahrani, Huda A. & Amin, Mohammed A. & Sun, Minghui, 2023. "Towards sustainable development through the design, multi-aspect analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a novel solar-based multi-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    16. Mohammadi, Zahra & Fallah, Mohsen, 2023. "Conventional and advanced exergy investigation of a double flash cycle integrated by absorption cooling, ORC, and TEG power system driven by geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    17. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    18. Qian, Xiaoyan & Dai, Jie & Jiang, Weimin & Cai, Helen & Ye, Xixi & Shahab Vafadaran, Mohammad, 2024. "Economic viability and investment returns of innovative geothermal tri-generation systems: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Liang, Zheng & Liang, Yingzong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Yang, Zhi & Wang, Chao & Chen, Ying, 2022. "Superstructure-based mixed-integer nonlinear programming framework for hybrid heat sources driven organic Rankine cycle optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    20. Meng, Yue & Wu, Haoyue & Zheng, Yuhang & Wang, Kunpeng & Duan, Yinying, 2022. "Comparative analysis and multi-objective optimization of hydrogen liquefaction process using either organic Rankine or absorption power cycles driven by dual-source biomass fuel and geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:246:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222002134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.