IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v246y2022ics0360544222000846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning for low-carbon energy-transportation system at metropolitan scale: A case study of Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yanxia
  • Gan, Shaojun
  • Li, Kang
  • Chen, Yanyan

Abstract

The urbanization and expansion of megalopolises have led to concerns on traffic, energy crisis and deteriorated green-house gas emissions, and thus the electric vehicles (EVs) are expected to be an essential role in alleviating these problems. In this study, a flexible-possibilist chanced constraints programming (FCCP) model is developed to plan low-carbon energy-transportation systems at the metropolitan scale (METS), which can incorporate multiple uncertainties in both the soft constraints and objective function. By integrating the possibilist programming with fuzzy sets and chanced constraint, the FCCP could tackle multiple complexities such as the combination of vague possibilities, flexibilities and probabilities, hence is superior to conventional approaches. The FCCP model is then applied for the planning METS in Beijing, and solutions are obtained under different satisfactory degrees and confidence levels. The results reveal that: 1) the power demand will be increasingly dependent on the imported power and renewable energy in Beijing; 2) the mass roll-out of EVs will reduce 6.7 million tonnes of CH, 44.7 million tonnes of CO and 1.08 × 105 million tonnes of CO2 respectively, while the need of battery supply facilities will cost approximately 4 × 109 dollars; 3) the carbon emissions will decrease with the growing number of EVs, the upgraded power supply pattern and the stringent policies. These findings could support decision-makers to plan the METS system when faced with multiple uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yanxia & Gan, Shaojun & Li, Kang & Chen, Yanyan, 2022. "Planning for low-carbon energy-transportation system at metropolitan scale: A case study of Beijing, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:246:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222000846
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222000846
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce L. Miller & Harvey M. Wagner, 1965. "Chance Constrained Programming with Joint Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 930-945, December.
    2. He, Hongwen & Wang, Yunlong & Han, Ruoyan & Han, Mo & Bai, Yunfei & Liu, Qingwu, 2021. "An improved MPC-based energy management strategy for hybrid vehicles using V2V and V2I communications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    3. Kropiwnicki, Jacek, 2019. "A unified approach to the analysis of electric energy and fuel consumption of cars in city traffic," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1045-1057.
    4. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    5. Ferro, G. & Minciardi, R. & Robba, M., 2020. "A user equilibrium model for electric vehicles: Joint traffic and energy demand assignment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Zhou, Bo & Chen, Guo & Song, Qiankun & Dong, Zhao Yang, 2020. "Robust chance-constrained programming approach for the planning of fast-charging stations in electrified transportation networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Li, Pengshun & Zhang, Yi & Zhang, Yi & Zhang, Kai & Jiang, Mengyan, 2021. "The effects of dynamic traffic conditions, route characteristics and environmental conditions on trip-based electricity consumption prediction of electric bus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    8. San Martín, Idoia & Berrueta, Alberto & Sanchis, Pablo & Ursúa, Alfredo, 2018. "Methodology for sizing stand-alone hybrid systems: A case study of a traffic control system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 870-881.
    9. Sheng, Mingyue Selena & Sreenivasan, Ajith Viswanath & Sharp, Basil & Du, Bo, 2021. "Well-to-wheel analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption for electric vehicles: A comparative study in Oceania," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Kall, P., 1982. "Stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 125-130, June.
    11. Chen, Chien-fei & Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo & Noel, Lance & Kester, Johannes & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2020. "Assessing the socio-demographic, technical, economic and behavioral factors of Nordic electric vehicle adoption and the influence of vehicle-to-grid preferences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dong, Kangyin & Ni, Guohua & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Zhao, Congyu, 2023. "Does smart transportation matter in inhibiting carbon inequality?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Ma, Kai & Zhao, Lei, 2024. "The impact of new energy transportation means on China's food import," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilsel, R. Ufuk & Ravindran, A., 2011. "A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1284-1300, September.
    2. Ümit Sakallı & Ömer Baykoç & Burak Birgören, 2011. "Stochastic optimization for blending problem in brass casting industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 141-157, June.
    3. Yanikoglu, I. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Safe Approximations of Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," Other publications TiSEM ab77f6f2-248a-42f1-bde1-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    5. Chen, Zhen & Archibald, Thomas W., 2024. "Maximizing the survival probability in a cash flow inventory problem with a joint service level constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    6. Maji, Chandi Charan, 1975. "Intertemporal allocation of irrigation water in the Mayurakshi Project (India): an application of deterministic and chance-constrained linear programming," ISU General Staff Papers 197501010800006381, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Xiaodi Bai & Jie Sun & Xiaojin Zheng, 2021. "An Augmented Lagrangian Decomposition Method for Chance-Constrained Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1056-1069, July.
    8. Bruni, M.E. & Conforti, D. & Beraldi, P. & Tundis, E., 2009. "Probabilistically constrained models for efficiency and dominance in DEA," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 219-228, January.
    9. SakallI, Ümit Sami & Baykoç, Ömer Faruk, 2011. "An optimization approach for brass casting blending problem under aletory and epistemic uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 708-718, October.
    10. Xide Zhu & Peijun Guo, 2020. "Bilevel programming approaches to production planning for multiple products with short life cycles," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 151-175, June.
    11. Jiang, C. & Zhang, Z.G. & Zhang, Q.F. & Han, X. & Xie, H.C. & Liu, J., 2014. "A new nonlinear interval programming method for uncertain problems with dependent interval variables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 245-253.
    12. Dawen Yan & Xiaohui Zhang & Mingzheng Wang, 2021. "A robust bank asset allocation model integrating credit-rating migration risk and capital adequacy ratio regulations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 659-710, April.
    13. Sengupta, Atanu & Pal, Tapan Kumar, 2000. "On comparing interval numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 28-43, November.
    14. Qiushi Chen & Lei Zhao & Jan C. Fransoo & Zhe Li, 2019. "Dual-mode inventory management under a chance credit constraint," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 147-178, March.
    15. Growe, Nicole, 1997. "Estimated stochastic programs with chance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 285-305, September.
    16. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    17. Rocchetta, Roberto & Crespo, Luis G., 2021. "A scenario optimization approach to reliability-based and risk-based design: Soft-constrained modulation of failure probability bounds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Jiang, C. & Han, X. & Liu, G.R. & Liu, G.P., 2008. "A nonlinear interval number programming method for uncertain optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Yanikoglu, I. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Safe Approximations of Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," Discussion Paper 2011-137, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. Michel Minoux & Riadh Zorgati, 2019. "Sharp upper and lower bounds for maximum likelihood solutions to random Gaussian bilateral inequality systems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 735-766, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:246:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222000846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.