IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v133y2011i2p708-718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimization approach for brass casting blending problem under aletory and epistemic uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • SakallI, Ümit Sami
  • Baykoç, Ömer Faruk

Abstract

A critical process in brass casting is the determination of the materials and their quantities to be added into the blend. The reason of being critical is the uncertainty about metal percentages in scrap raw materials. In this paper, the aleatory and epistemic uncertainties, which are modeled by using probability and possibility theory, respectively, have been handled simultaneously in a blending optimization problem for brass casting and a solution approach that transforms the possibilistic uncertainties into probabilistic ones is proposed. A numerical example is performed by the data supplied from MKE brass factory in Turkey. The results of the example have showed that the proposed approach can be effectively used for solving blending problem including aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in brass casting and other scrap based production process.

Suggested Citation

  • SakallI, Ümit Sami & Baykoç, Ömer Faruk, 2011. "An optimization approach for brass casting blending problem under aletory and epistemic uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 708-718, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:133:y:2011:i:2:p:708-718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527311002398
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dubois, Didier, 2006. "Possibility theory and statistical reasoning," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 47-69, November.
    2. Bruce L. Miller & Harvey M. Wagner, 1965. "Chance Constrained Programming with Joint Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 930-945, December.
    3. Dubois, Didier & Prade, Henri, 1986. "Fuzzy sets and statistical data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 345-356.
    4. Ashayeri, J. & van Eijs, A. G. M. & Nederstigt, P., 1994. "Blending modelling in a process manufacturing: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 460-468, February.
    5. Wang, Reay-Chen & Liang, Tien-Fu, 2005. "Applying possibilistic linear programming to aggregate production planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 328-341, December.
    6. Huang, Beiqing & Du, Xiaoping, 2008. "Probabilistic uncertainty analysis by mean-value first order Saddlepoint Approximation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 325-336.
    7. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    8. Rong, Aiying & Lahdelma, Risto, 2008. "Fuzzy chance constrained linear programming model for optimizing the scrap charge in steel production," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(3), pages 953-964, May.
    9. Mula, J. & Poler, R. & Garcia-Sabater, J.P. & Lario, F.C., 2006. "Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 271-285, September.
    10. Inuiguchi, Masahiro & Sakawa, Masatoshi & Kume, Yasufumi, 1994. "The usefulness of possibilistic programming in production planning problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1-3), pages 45-52, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bariş Keçeci & Yusuf Tansel Iç & Ergün Eraslan, 2019. "Development of a Spreadsheet DSS for Multi-Response Taguchi Parameter Optimization Problems Using the TOPSIS, VIKOR, and GRA Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1501-1531, September.
    2. Siemon, Michel & Schiffer, Maximilian & Walther, Grit, 2021. "Integrated purchasing and production planning for a non-Ferrous metal production network," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Reinol Josef Compañero & Andreas Feldmann & Peter Samuelsson & Anders Tilliander & Pär Göran Jönsson & Rutger Gyllenram, 2023. "Appraising the value of compositional information and its implications to scrap-based production of steel," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(3), pages 463-480, September.
    4. Djeumou Fomeni, Franklin, 2018. "A multi-objective optimization approach for the blending problem in the tea industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 179-192.
    5. Aydoğan Baş & Burak Birgören & Ümit Sami Sakalli, 2024. "Obtaining a Multi-Factor Optimum Blend Using Scrap within the Scope of Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Steel Production: Application in a Steel-Casting Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ümit Sakallı & Ömer Baykoç & Burak Birgören, 2011. "Stochastic optimization for blending problem in brass casting industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 141-157, June.
    2. Xide Zhu & Peijun Guo, 2020. "Bilevel programming approaches to production planning for multiple products with short life cycles," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 151-175, June.
    3. Mula, Josefa & Peidro, David & Poler, Raul, 2010. "The effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supply chain production planning with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 136-143, November.
    4. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    5. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    6. Borodin, Valeria & Dolgui, Alexandre & Hnaien, Faicel & Labadie, Nacima, 2016. "Component replenishment planning for a single-level assembly system under random lead times: A chance constrained programming approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 79-86.
    7. Rocchetta, Roberto & Crespo, Luis G., 2021. "A scenario optimization approach to reliability-based and risk-based design: Soft-constrained modulation of failure probability bounds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Bilsel, R. Ufuk & Ravindran, A., 2011. "A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1284-1300, September.
    9. Yong Zeng & Yanpeng Cai & Guohe Huang & Jing Dai, 2011. "A Review on Optimization Modeling of Energy Systems Planning and GHG Emission Mitigation under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(10), pages 1-33, October.
    10. Yanikoglu, I. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Safe Approximations of Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," Other publications TiSEM ab77f6f2-248a-42f1-bde1-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    12. Chen, Zhen & Archibald, Thomas W., 2024. "Maximizing the survival probability in a cash flow inventory problem with a joint service level constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    13. Yanikoglu, I. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Safe Approximations of Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," Discussion Paper 2011-137, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    14. Michel Minoux & Riadh Zorgati, 2019. "Sharp upper and lower bounds for maximum likelihood solutions to random Gaussian bilateral inequality systems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 735-766, November.
    15. Maji, Chandi Charan, 1975. "Intertemporal allocation of irrigation water in the Mayurakshi Project (India): an application of deterministic and chance-constrained linear programming," ISU General Staff Papers 197501010800006381, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    16. İhsan Yanıkoğlu & Dick den Hertog, 2013. "Safe Approximations of Ambiguous Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 666-681, November.
    17. Yasser A. Davizón & César Martínez-Olvera & Rogelio Soto & Carlos Hinojosa & Piero Espino-Román, 2015. "Optimal Control Approaches to the Aggregate Production Planning Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Shih-Pin Chen & Wen-Lung Huang, 2014. "Solving Fuzzy Multiproduct Aggregate Production Planning Problems Based on Extension Principle," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-18, August.
    19. Panda, D. & Kar, S. & Maity, K. & Maiti, M., 2008. "A single period inventory model with imperfect production and stochastic demand under chance and imprecise constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 121-139, July.
    20. Xiaodi Bai & Jie Sun & Xiaojin Zheng, 2021. "An Augmented Lagrangian Decomposition Method for Chance-Constrained Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1056-1069, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:133:y:2011:i:2:p:708-718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.