IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v244y2022ipas0360544221029273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analyses of a geothermal power plant with NCGs reinjection

Author

Listed:
  • Shamoushaki, Moein
  • Fiaschi, Daniele
  • Manfrida, Giampaolo
  • Talluri, Lorenzo

Abstract

In this study, a conceptual geothermal power plant with Non-Condensable Gases (NCGs) reinjection is analyzed from energy, exergy, exergo-economic, and environmental perspectives. The cycle is evaluated in considering both subcritical and supercritical working conditions. A sensitivity analysis comprising the variation of condensing temperature, turbine inlet pressure, and amount of NCGs within the geofluid is performed to assess the system performance from the thermodynamic, economic, and environmental points of view. The exergy efficiency results for the supercritical and the subcritical cycles are 52% and 50.5%, respectively. Results showed increasing the condensing temperature decreases exergy efficiency, net power, and exergetic performance parameters and increases total exergy destruction, exergo-destruction impact, and specific power cost in both working cases. According to the obtained results, an increase in the inlet pressure of the turbine in the supercritical case study reduces exergy efficiency and exergetic performance and increases the exergo-destruction impact factor. However, it increases the cycle exergy efficiency and exergetic performance criteria first and then decreases in a subcritical case. The LCOE for the supercritical cycle is 6.96 (c€/kWh) and for the subcritical is 5.52 (c€/kWh). The highest exergy destruction rates are related to the main heat exchanger, condenser, and turbine, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Shamoushaki, Moein & Fiaschi, Daniele & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Talluri, Lorenzo, 2022. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analyses of a geothermal power plant with NCGs reinjection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:244:y:2022:i:pa:s0360544221029273
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221029273
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    2. Leveni, Martina & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Cozzolino, Raffaello & Mendecka, Barbara, 2019. "Energy and exergy analysis of cold and power production from the geothermal reservoir of Torre Alfina," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 807-818.
    3. Samadi, Fereshteh & Kazemi, Neda, 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis of zeotropic mixture on the new proposed organic Rankine cycle for energy production from geothermal resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1250-1265.
    4. Moein Shamoushaki & Pouriya H. Niknam & Lorenzo Talluri & Giampaolo Manfrida & Daniele Fiaschi, 2021. "Development of Cost Correlations for the Economic Assessment of Power Plant Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Sun, Qingxuan & Wang, Yaxiong & Cheng, Ziyang & Wang, Jiangfeng & Zhao, Pan & Dai, Yiping, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic optimization of a double-pressure organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature heat source," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2822-2832.
    6. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    7. Coskun, C. & Oktay, Z. & Dincer, I., 2011. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling of geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6358-6366.
    8. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    9. Shamoushaki, Moein & Ehyaei, M.A. & Ghanatir, Farrokh, 2017. "Exergy, economic and environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a SOFC-GT power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 515-531.
    10. Moein Shamoushaki & Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Tempesti, Duccio & Fiaschi, Daniele, 2013. "Thermo-economic assessment of a micro CHP system fuelled by geothermal and solar energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 45-51.
    12. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    13. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    14. Moein Shamoushaki & Giampaolo Manfrida & Lorenzo Talluri & Pouriya H. Niknam & Daniele Fiaschi, 2021. "Different Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations Cost Estimation Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tailu Li & Ruizhao Gao & Xiang Gao & Qinghua Liu, 2022. "Synergetic Effect of Non-Condensable Gas and Steam Quality on the Production Capacity of Geothermal Wells and Geothermal Power Generation for Hot Dry Rock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Alicja Lenarczyk & Marcin Jaskólski & Paweł Bućko, 2022. "The Application of a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Indication of Directions of the Development of Renewable Energy Sources in the Context of Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moein Shamoushaki & Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    3. Shuozhuo Hu & Zhen Yang & Jian Li & Yuanyuan Duan, 2021. "A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.
    4. Moein Shamoushaki & Giampaolo Manfrida & Lorenzo Talluri & Pouriya H. Niknam & Daniele Fiaschi, 2021. "Different Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations Cost Estimation Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Abdolalipouradl, Mehran & Mohammadkhani, Farzad & Khalilarya, Shahram, 2020. "A comparative analysis of novel combined flash-binary cycles for Sabalan geothermal wells: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic viewpoints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng & Cao, Liyan & Wang, Yu, 2016. "Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 470-487.
    7. Yu, Haoshui & Eason, John & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous heat integration and techno-economic optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for multiple waste heat stream recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 322-333.
    8. M. Ehyaei & M. Kasaeian & Stéphane Abanades & Armin Razmjoo & Hamed Afshari & Marc Rosen & Biplab Das, 2023. "Natural gas‐fueled multigeneration for reducing environmental effects of brine and increasing product diversity: Thermodynamic and economic analyses," Post-Print hal-04113893, HAL.
    9. Zhou, Xiao & Cai, Yangchao & Li, Xuetao, 2024. "Process arrangement and multi-aspect study of a novel environmentally-friendly multigeneration plant relying on a geothermal-based plant combined with the goswami cycle booted by kalina and desalinati," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    10. Hashemian, Nasim & Noorpoor, Alireza, 2022. "A geothermal-biomass powered multi-generation plant with freshwater and hydrogen generation options: Thermo-economic-environmental appraisals and multi-criteria optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 254-266.
    11. Agudelo, Andrés & Valero, Antonio & Torres, César, 2012. "Allocation of waste cost in thermoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 634-643.
    12. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    13. Kazemi, Shabnam & Nor, Mohamad Iskandr Mohamad & Teoh, Wen Hui, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an ionic liquid as a new proposed geothermal fluid in different organic Rankine cycles for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Fan, Guangli & Ahmadi, A. & Ehyaei, M.A. & Das, Biplab, 2021. "Energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental analyses of polygeneration system integrated gas cycle, absorption chiller, and Copper-Chlorine thermochemical cycle to produce power, cooling, and hyd," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Shiyang Teng & Yong-Qiang Feng & Tzu-Chen Hung & Huan Xi, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimization and Fluid Selection of Different Cogeneration of Heat and Power Systems Based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Gerber, Léda & Maréchal, François, 2012. "Environomic optimal configurations of geothermal energy conversion systems: Application to the future construction of Enhanced Geothermal Systems in Switzerland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 908-923.
    17. Behzadi, Amirmohammad & Gholamian, Ehsan & Houshfar, Ehsan & Habibollahzade, Ali, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of waste heat recovery from Tehran's waste-to-energy plant integrated with an ORC unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1055-1068.
    18. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Fierro, José J. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Potential savings in the cement industry using waste heat recovery technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    19. Zhang, Feng & Lei, Fang & Liao, Gaoliang & Jiaqiang, E., 2022. "Performance assessment and optimization on a novel geothermal combined cooling and power system integrating an absorption power cycle with an absorption-compression hybrid refrigeration cycle in paral," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 1061-1075.
    20. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycle alternatives for the cement industry using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology and energy-economic-environmental (3E) analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:244:y:2022:i:pa:s0360544221029273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.