IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v239y2022ipds0360544221025743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas as an alternative source of decentralized bioelectricity for large waste producers: An assessment framework at the University of São Paulo

Author

Listed:
  • D'Aquino, Camila A.
  • Santos, Samantha C.
  • Sauer, Ildo L.

Abstract

Decentralized power plants fueled with biogas from organic waste are a keystone for large waste producers responsible for their waste management to reduce the impact of waste generation and poor management, especially in the urban centers, alongside bioenergy and other value-added products generation. This work presents an assessment framework for the characterization quantification and assessment of the biogas potential using theoretical and lab-scale methodologies to evaluate the technical and economic bioelectricity potential from biogas using the organic residues and effluents produced in the main USP campus. The yearly costs to transport and dispose of these residues are around US$ 3,253,716.25, and the electricity consumption is about 8.6 million US$/y. As a large generator, USP is responsible for its residue management, and reduce its generation by the local use to produce bioelectricity is a feasible option. The results show a biogas potential up to 2,363,405.15 m3, allowing for a bioelectricity generation of up to 4454 MWh/y. A potential to produce 3081.131 tones of dry biofertilizer was also estimated. The wasted resource could currently supply up to 5.6% of the Campus's electricity demand, with an investment of around US$ 1.5 million and a payback range between 3.64 and 7.5 years.

Suggested Citation

  • D'Aquino, Camila A. & Santos, Samantha C. & Sauer, Ildo L., 2022. "Biogas as an alternative source of decentralized bioelectricity for large waste producers: An assessment framework at the University of São Paulo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pd:s0360544221025743
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221025743
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chowdhury, Hemal & Chowdhury, Tamal & Miskat, Monirul Islam & Hossain, Nazia & Chowdhury, Piyal & Sait, Sadiq M., 2021. "Potential of biogas and bioelectricity production from Rohingya camp in Bangladesh: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Anyaoku, Chukwunonso Chinedu & Baroutian, Saeid, 2018. "Decentralized anaerobic digestion systems for increased utilization of biogas from municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 982-991.
    3. Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Qing & Gul, Eid & Shi, Mengmeng & Li, Jiashuo & Yang, Minjiao & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Bin & Zhao, Haibo & Yan, Yunjun & Erdoğan, Güneş & Bartocci, Pietro & Fantozzi, Francesco, 2021. "Decarbonizing university campuses through the production of biogas from food waste: An LCA analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 565-578.
    4. Khayum, Naseem & Anbarasu, S. & Murugan, S., 2018. "Biogas potential from spent tea waste: A laboratory scale investigation of co-digestion with cow manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 760-768.
    5. O'Connor, S. & Ehimen, E. & Pillai, S.C. & Black, A. & Tormey, D. & Bartlett, J., 2021. "Biogas production from small-scale anaerobic digestion plants on European farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Dittmer, Celina & Krümpel, Johannes & Lemmer, Andreas, 2021. "Power demand forecasting for demand-driven energy production with biogas plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1871-1877.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Camila Agner D’Aquino & Bruno Alves Pereira & Tulio Ferreira Sawatani & Samantha Coelho de Moura & Alice Tagima & Júlia Carolina Bevervanso Borba Ferrarese & Samantha Christine Santos & Ildo Luis Saue, 2022. "Biogas Potential from Slums as a Sustainable and Resilient Route for Renewable Energy Diffusion in Urban Areas and Organic Waste Management in Vulnerable Communities in São Paulo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-10, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amit Kumar Jaglan & Venkata Ravi Sankar Cheela & Mansi Vinaik & Brajesh Dubey, 2022. "Environmental Impact Evaluation of University Integrated Waste Management System in India Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Ewa Chodakowska & Joanicjusz Nazarko & Łukasz Nazarko, 2021. "ARIMA Models in Electrical Load Forecasting and Their Robustness to Noise," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Gonçalves Rigueira Pinheiro Castro, Pedro Henrique & Filho, Delly Oliveira & Rosa, André Pereira & Navas Gracia, Luis Manuel & Almeida Silva, Thais Cristina, 2024. "Comparison of externalities of biogas and photovoltaic solar energy for energy planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Hollas, C.E. & Bolsan, A.C. & Chini, A. & Venturin, B. & Bonassa, G. & Cândido, D. & Antes, F.G. & Steinmetz, R.L.R. & Prado, N.V. & Kunz, A., 2021. "Effects of swine manure storage time on solid-liquid separation and biogas production: A life-cycle assessment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Jindong Yang & Xiran Zhang & Wenhao Chen & Fei Rong, 2024. "Prophet–CEEMDAN–ARBiLSTM-Based Model for Short-Term Load Forecasting," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Nobuki Morita & Yo Toma & Hideto Ueno, 2024. "Acceleration of Composting by Addition of Clinker to Tea Leaf Compost," Waste, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Liu, Gang & Wang, Kun & Hao, Xiaochen & Zhang, Zhipeng & Zhao, Yantao & Xu, Qingquan, 2022. "SA-LSTMs: A new advance prediction method of energy consumption in cement raw materials grinding system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Piso, Giuseppe Cristian & Bareschino, Piero & Brachi, Paola & Tregambi, Claudio & Ruoppolo, Giovanna & Pepe, Francesco & Mancusi, Erasmo, 2023. "Numerical simulation of biogas chemical looping reforming in a dual fluidized bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 350-358.
    9. Wu, Di & Li, Lei & Peng, Yun & Yang, Pingjin & Peng, Xuya & Sun, Yongming & Wang, Xiaoming, 2021. "State indicators of anaerobic digestion: A critical review on process monitoring and diagnosis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Kiyotaka Tsunemi & Tohru Kawamoto & Hideyuki Matsumoto, 2023. "Estimation of the Potential Global Nitrogen Flow in a Nitrogen Recycling System with Industrial Countermeasures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, March.
    11. Paul Thomas & Nirmala Soren, 2020. "An overview of municipal solid waste-to-energy application in Indian scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 575-592, February.
    12. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Wantz, Eliot & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2022. "Rate-based modeling approach for High Pressure Water Scrubbing with unsteady gas flowrate and multicomponent absorption applied to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    14. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Khayum, Naseem & Anbarasu, S. & Murugan, S., 2021. "Optimization of fuel injection parameters and compression ratio of a biogas fueled diesel engine using methyl esters of waste cooking oil as a pilot fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    16. Dahunsi, S.O., 2019. "Liquefaction of pineapple peel: Pretreatment and process optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1017-1031.
    17. Walter Leal Filho & Priscilla Cristina Cabral Ribeiro & Andréia Faraoni Freitas Setti & Fardous Mohammad Safiul Azam & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Julen Castillo-Apraiz & Unai Tamayo & Pinar Gokcin Özuyar, 2024. "Toward food waste reduction at universities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 16585-16606, July.
    18. Wantz, Eliot & Lemonnier, Mathis & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2023. "Innovative high-pressure water scrubber for biogas upgrading at farm-scale using vacuum for water regeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    19. Moustakas, K. & Parmaxidou, P. & Vakalis, S., 2020. "Anaerobic digestion for energy production from agricultural biomass waste in Greece: Capacity assessment for the region of Thessaly," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Muhamed Rasit Atelge & Halil Senol & Mohammed Djaafri & Tulin Avci Hansu & David Krisa & Abdulaziz Atabani & Cigdem Eskicioglu & Hamdi Muratçobanoğlu & Sebahattin Unalan & Slimane Kalloum & Nuri Azbar, 2021. "A Critical Overview of the State-of-the-Art Methods for Biogas Purification and Utilization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-39, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pd:s0360544221025743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.