IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v188y2024ics0301421524000909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of externalities of biogas and photovoltaic solar energy for energy planning

Author

Listed:
  • Gonçalves Rigueira Pinheiro Castro, Pedro Henrique
  • Filho, Delly Oliveira
  • Rosa, André Pereira
  • Navas Gracia, Luis Manuel
  • Almeida Silva, Thais Cristina

Abstract

The Brazilian electricity matrix is around 80% renewable, and it has registered continuous growth in the expansion of biogas and photovoltaic (PV) systems. The main current Brazilian incentive program for the distributed generation of renewable energy, through a single net metering tariff, that is, a generation compensation system in credits to the consumer who owns the generating unit, does not seem to be effective to promote the expected growth of the biogas. Thus, the objective of this paper was to evaluate quantitatively and qualitatively a set of significant externalities for both sources to contribute to a more realistic energy planning. The externalities quantitatively evaluated for these two renewable sources were: avoided emissions, employment and income, biofertilizers for biogas and use as a constructive element for PV systems. A significant result was that the economic value of the externalities of biogas can exceed those of PV systems for the rural producer by more than 11 times, for society by 1.7 times. It is concluded that, due to the value of biogas externalities being much higher economically than those of PV systems, Brazilian public policies for energy planning should prioritize biogas over solar photovoltaic energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonçalves Rigueira Pinheiro Castro, Pedro Henrique & Filho, Delly Oliveira & Rosa, André Pereira & Navas Gracia, Luis Manuel & Almeida Silva, Thais Cristina, 2024. "Comparison of externalities of biogas and photovoltaic solar energy for energy planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000909
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524000909
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    2. Chin-Hsien Hsu & Hsiao-Hsien Lin & Shangwun Jhang, 2020. "Sustainable Tourism Development in Protected Areas of Rivers and Water Sources: A Case Study of Jiuqu Stream in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Achinas, Spyridon & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Aquila, Giancarlo & Coelho, Eden de Oliveira Pinto & Bonatto, Benedito Donizeti & Pamplona, Edson de Oliveira & Nakamura, Wilson Toshiro, 2021. "Perspective of uncertainty and risk from the CVaR-LCOE approach: An analysis of the case of PV microgeneration in Minas Gerais, Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Sanni, Shereefdeen Oladapo & Oricha, Joseph Yakubu & Oyewole, Taoheed Oluwafemi & Bawonda, Femi Ikotoni, 2021. "Analysis of backup power supply for unreliable grid using hybrid solar PV/diesel/biogas system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Freitas, F.F. & Furtado, A.C. & Piñas, J.A.V. & Venturini, O.J. & Barros, R.M. & Lora, E.E.S., 2022. "Holistic Life Cycle Assessment of a biogas-based electricity generation plant in a pig farm considering co-digestion and an additive," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    7. Cossent, Rafael & Gómez, Tomás & Frías, Pablo, 2009. "Towards a future with large penetration of distributed generation: Is the current regulation of electricity distribution ready? Regulatory recommendations under a European perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1145-1155, March.
    8. Iglesias, Caroline & Vilaça, Phillipe, 2022. "On the regulation of solar distributed generation in Brazil: A look at both sides," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Christian Krekel & Julia Rechlitz & Johannes Rode & Alexander Zerrahn, 2020. "Quantifying the externalities of renewable energy plants using wellbeing data: The case of biogas," CEP Discussion Papers dp1738, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    10. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Rezazadeh, A. & Kabiri, S., 2020. "A feasibility study on the potential, economic, and environmental advantages of biogas production from poultry manure in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 87-106.
    11. Minnaar, U.J., 2016. "Regulatory practices and Distribution System Cost impact studies for distributed generation: Considerations for South African distribution utilities and regulators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1139-1149.
    12. Mehrjerdi, Hasan, 2019. "Simultaneous load leveling and voltage profile improvement in distribution networks by optimal battery storage planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 916-926.
    13. Kaiser, Micha & Bernauer, Manuela & Sunstein, Cass R. & Reisch, Lucia A., 2020. "The power of green defaults: the impact of regional variation of opt-out tariffs on green energy demand in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Siqi Zheng & Jianghao Wang & Cong Sun & Xiaonan Zhang & Matthew E. Kahn, 2019. "Air pollution lowers Chinese urbanites’ expressed happiness on social media," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(3), pages 237-243, March.
    15. Velásquez Piñas, Jean Agustin & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & del Olmo, Oscar Almazan & Calle Roalcaba, Orly Denisse, 2019. "An economic holistic feasibility assessment of centralized and decentralized biogas plants with mono-digestion and co-digestion systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 40-51.
    16. Li, Jidong & Chen, Shijun & Wu, Yuqiang & Wang, Qinhui & Liu, Xing & Qi, Lijian & Lu, Xiuyuan & Gao, Lu, 2021. "How to make better use of intermittent and variable energy? A review of wind and photovoltaic power consumption in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Lamnatou, Chr. & Chemisana, D., 2017. "Photovoltaic/thermal (PVT) systems: A review with emphasis on environmental issues," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 270-287.
    18. Hdom, Hélde A.D., 2019. "Examining carbon dioxide emissions, fossil & renewable electricity generation and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of South American countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 186-197.
    19. Bartczak, Anna & Chilton, Susan & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Meyerhoff, Jürgen, 2017. "Gain and loss of money in a choice experiment. The impact of financial loss aversion and risk preferences on willingness to pay to avoid renewable energy externalities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 326-334.
    20. O'Connor, S. & Ehimen, E. & Pillai, S.C. & Black, A. & Tormey, D. & Bartlett, J., 2021. "Biogas production from small-scale anaerobic digestion plants on European farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    21. Jensen, Ida Græsted & Skovsgaard, Lise, 2017. "The impact of CO2-costs on biogas usage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 289-300.
    22. Wang, Changbo & Zhang, Yaoqi & Zhang, Lixiao & Pang, Mingyue, 2016. "Alternative policies to subsidize rural household biogas digesters," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 187-195.
    23. Ferreira, Miguel & Marques, Isabel Paula & Malico, Isabel, 2012. "Biogas in Portugal: Status and public policies in a European context," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 267-274.
    24. Neshat, Soheil A. & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Najafpour, Ghasem D. & Lahijani, Pooya, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 308-322.
    25. Martins, F.R. & Abreu, S.L. & Pereira, E.B., 2012. "Scenarios for solar thermal energy applications in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 640-649.
    26. Nogueira, Carlos Eduardo Camargo & de Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari & Micuanski, Viviane Cavaler & Azevedo, Ricardo Lessa, 2015. "Exploring possibilities of energy insertion from vinasse biogas in the energy matrix of Paraná State, Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 300-305.
    27. Minh Quan Duong & Thai Dinh Pham & Thang Trung Nguyen & Anh Tuan Doan & Hai Van Tran, 2019. "Determination of Optimal Location and Sizing of Solar Photovoltaic Distribution Generation Units in Radial Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 2: Mainstream and downstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1392-1407.
    2. Pal, Ankit & Ilango, G. Saravana, 2024. "Design and techno-economic analysis of an off-grid integrated PV-biogas system with a constant temperature digester for a cost-effective rural application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    3. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Ming, Yaxin & Deng, Huixin & Wu, Xiaoyue, 2022. "The negative effect of air pollution on people's pro-environmental behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 72-87.
    5. Ismail, M.S. & Moghavvemi, M. & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2013. "Current utilization of microturbines as a part of a hybrid system in distributed generation technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 142-152.
    6. L. Mundaca & H. Moncreiff, 2021. "New Perspectives on Green Energy Defaults," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 357-383, September.
    7. Alves, Luís & Pereira, Vítor & Lagarteira, Tiago & Mendes, Adélio, 2021. "Catalytic methane decomposition to boost the energy transition: Scientific and technological advancements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Christina Gravert, 2024. "From Intent to Inertia: Experimental Evidence from the Retail Electricity Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 11139, CESifo.
    9. de Almeida, Claudinei & Bariccatti, Reinaldo Aparecido & Frare, Laercio Mantovani & Camargo Nogueira, Carlos Eduardo & Mondardo, Andrei Antônio & Contini, Leonardo & Gomes, Gláucio José & Rovaris, Sol, 2017. "Analysis of the socio-economic feasibility of the implementation of an agro-energy condominium in western Paraná – Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 601-608.
    10. D’Alfonso, Tiziana & Jiang, Changmin & Bracaglia, Valentina, 2016. "Air transport and high-speed rail competition: Environmental implications and mitigation strategies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 261-276.
    11. Younessi, Hiva Seyed & Bahramara, Salah & Adabi, Farid & Golpîra, Hêmin, 2023. "Modeling the optimal sizing problem of the biogas-based electrical generator in a livestock farm considering a gas storage tank and the anaerobic digester process under the uncertainty of cow dung," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    12. Abdul K Hamid & Nsilulu T Mbungu & A. Elnady & Ramesh C Bansal & Ali A Ismail & Mohammad A AlShabi, 2023. "A systematic review of grid-connected photovoltaic and photovoltaic/thermal systems: Benefits, challenges and mitigation," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(7), pages 2775-2814, November.
    13. Moreno, Álex & Chemisana, Daniel & Lamnatou, Chrysovalantou & Maestro, Santiago, 2023. "Energy and photosynthetic performance investigation of a semitransparent photovoltaic rooftop greenhouse for building integration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    14. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    16. Rajput, Usman Jamil & Yang, Jun, 2018. "Comparison of heat sink and water type PV/T collector for polycrystalline photovoltaic panel cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 479-491.
    17. Gao, Yuchen & Jiang, Jianguo & Meng, Yuan & Aihemaiti, Aikelaimu & Ju, Tongyao & Chen, Xuejing & Yan, Feng, 2020. "A novel nickel catalyst supported on activated coal fly ash for syngas production via biogas dry reforming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 786-793.
    18. Calvillo, C.F. & Sánchez-Miralles, A. & Villar, J. & Martín, F., 2016. "Optimal planning and operation of aggregated distributed energy resources with market participation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 340-357.
    19. Jiang, Hou & Yao, Ling & Lu, Ning & Qin, Jun & Zhang, Xiaotong & Liu, Tang & Zhang, Xingxing & Zhou, Chenghu, 2024. "Exploring the optimization of rooftop photovoltaic scale and spatial layout under curtailment constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    20. Elena Tamburini & Mattias Gaglio & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano, 2020. "Is Bioenergy Truly Sustainable When Land-Use-Change (LUC) Emissions Are Accounted for? The Case-Study of Biogas from Agricultural Biomass in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.