IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v236y2021ics0360544221016893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An improved system for evaluating the adaptability of natural gas flooding in enhancing oil recovery considering the miscible ability

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Yong
  • Chen, Yulin
  • He, Youwei
  • Yu, Guangming
  • Guo, Xifeng
  • Yang, Qing
  • Wang, Yong

Abstract

Adaptability evaluation of reservoirs needs to be performed before natural gas flooding. However, the current evaluation methods consider the reservoir pressure and minimum miscible pressure (MMP) as separate parameters to evaluate the miscibility, which ignores the correlation between reservoir pressure and MMP. Also, the effect of reservoir pressure on injectivity is also neglected, while higher pressure than MMP may not improve the miscibility but increase the difficulty of gas injection. Furthermore, evaluation range of each index is inconsistent. Therefore, this paper proposes an improved evaluation system by introducing the miscible ability and optimizing the evaluation criteria to better evaluate the adaptability of natural gas flooding in enhancing oil recovery. The miscible ability is newly defined to evaluate the impact of reservoir pressure on miscibility, and multi-level evaluation model is further developed which includes 12 indexes based on reservoir/fluid/rock properties. The evaluation criteria are established by optimizing parameter intervals. The adaptability of BQ Oil field is assessed using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy evaluation. Field application validates the reliability of the proposed evaluation system. It can be used to quickly evaluate the adaptability of natural gas flooding, which could improve success rate of natural gas flooding and reduce the costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Yong & Chen, Yulin & He, Youwei & Yu, Guangming & Guo, Xifeng & Yang, Qing & Wang, Yong, 2021. "An improved system for evaluating the adaptability of natural gas flooding in enhancing oil recovery considering the miscible ability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:236:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221016893
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221016893
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren, Bo & Duncan, Ian J., 2019. "Reservoir simulation of carbon storage associated with CO2 EOR in residual oil zones, San Andres formation of West Texas, Permian Basin, USA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 391-401.
    2. Ren, Bo & Ren, Shaoran & Zhang, Liang & Chen, Guoli & Zhang, Hua, 2016. "Monitoring on CO2 migration in a tight oil reservoir during CCS-EOR in Jilin Oilfield China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-121.
    3. Kamaruzzaman, Syahrul Nizam & Lou, Eric Choen Weng & Wong, Phui Fung & Edwards, Rodger & Hamzah, Noraini & Ghani, Mohd Khairolden, 2019. "Development of a non-domestic building refurbishment scheme for Malaysia: A Delphi approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 804-818.
    4. Holloway, S., 2005. "Underground sequestration of carbon dioxide—a viable greenhouse gas mitigation option," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 2318-2333.
    5. Toscano, G. & Duca, D. & Rossini, G. & Mengarelli, C. & Pizzi, A., 2015. "Identification of different woody biomass for energy purpose by means of Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogy applied to thermogravimetric analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 351-357.
    6. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    7. Huang, Jingwei & Jin, Tianying & Barrufet, Maria & Killough, John, 2020. "Evaluation of CO2 injection into shale gas reservoirs considering dispersed distribution of kerogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    8. Kraidi, Layth & Shah, Raj & Matipa, Wilfred & Borthwick, Fiona, 2020. "Using stakeholders’ judgement and fuzzy logic theory to analyze the risk influencing factors in oil and gas pipeline projects: Case study in Iraq, Stage II," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Long, Keji & Tang, Yong & He, Youwei & Luo, Yulong & Hong, Yinghe & Sun, Yu & Rui, Zhenhua, 2024. "Full-cycle enhancing condensate recovery-underground gas storage by integrating cyclic gas flooding and storage from gas condensate reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Yan, Zechen & Li, Xiaofang & Zhu, Xu & Wang, Ping & Yu, Shifan & Li, Haonan & Wei, Kangxing & Li, Yan & Xue, Qingzhong, 2023. "MD-CFD simulation on the miscible displacement process of hydrocarbon gas flooding under deep reservoir conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    3. Popkova, Elena G. & Sergi, Bruno S., 2024. "Energy infrastructure: Investment, sustainability and AI," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Zemin Ji & Qun Zhang & Yang Gao & Jing Wang & Chang He & Lu Han & Wenjing Zhao, 2022. "Experimental Study on Conformance Control Using Acidic Nanoparticles in a Heterogeneous Reservoir by Flue Gas Flooding," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Mingyu & Su, Yuliang & Elsworth, Derek & Li, Lei & Fan, Liyao, 2021. "Hydro-mechanical-chemical modeling of sub-nanopore capillary-confinement on CO2-CCUS-EOR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Zhang, Lisong & Zhang, Shiyan & Jiang, Weizhai & Wang, Zhiyuan & Li, Jing & Bian, Yinghui, 2018. "A mechanism of fluid exchange associated to CO2 leakage along activated fault during geologic storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1178-1190.
    3. Qin, Jiazheng & Song, Junjie & Tang, Yong & Rui, Zhenhua & Wang, Yong & He, Youwei, 2023. "Well applicability assessment based on fuzzy theory for CO2 sequestration in depleted gas reservoirs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 239-250.
    4. Yang, Renfeng & Zhang, Jinqing & Chen, Han & Jiang, Ruizhong & Sun, Zhe & Rui, Zhenhua, 2019. "The injectivity variation prediction model for water flooding oilfields sustainable development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Wang, H.D. & Chen, Y. & Ma, G.W., 2020. "Effects of capillary pressures on two-phase flow of immiscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery in fractured media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Emad A. Al‐Khdheeawi & Stephanie Vialle & Ahmed Barifcani & Mohammad Sarmadivaleh & Stefan Iglauer, 2017. "Influence of CO 2 ‐wettability on CO 2 migration and trapping capacity in deep saline aquifers," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 328-338, April.
    7. Kun Qian & Shenglai Yang & Hongen Dou & Qian Wang & Lu Wang & Yu Huang, 2018. "Experimental Investigation on Microscopic Residual Oil Distribution During CO 2 Huff-and-Puff Process in Tight Oil Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Jelena Lukić & Mirjana Misita & Dragan D. Milanović & Ankica Borota-Tišma & Aleksandra Janković, 2022. "Determining the Risk Level in Client Analysis by Applying Fuzzy Logic in Insurance Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Thanh Quang Nguyen & Sonia Longo & Maurizio Cellura & Le Quyen Luu & Alessandra Bertoli & Letizia Bua, 2024. "Evaluating and Prioritizing Circular Supply Chain Alternatives in the Energy Context with a Holistic Multi-Indicator Decision Support System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-32, October.
    10. Valentina Bosetti & Laurent Gilotte, 2005. "Carbon Capture and Sequestration: How Much Does this Uncertain Option Affect Near-Term Policy Choices?," Working Papers 2005.86, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    11. Xiao, Caiyun & Ni, Hongjian & Shi, Xian, 2022. "Unsteady model for wellbore pressure transmission of carbon dioxide fracturing considering limited-flow outlet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    12. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2017. "Demonstrating sustainable energy: A review based model of sustainable energy demonstration projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1349-1362.
    13. Rahmad Syah & Seyed Mehdi Alizadeh & Karina Shamilyevna Nurgalieva & John William Grimaldo Guerrero & Mahyuddin K. M. Nasution & Afshin Davarpanah & Dadan Ramdan & Ahmed Sayed M. Metwally, 2021. "A Laboratory Approach to Measure Enhanced Gas Recovery from a Tight Gas Reservoir during Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Injection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Luo, Xu & Ge, Zhexue & Zhang, ShiGang & Yang, Yongmin, 2021. "A method for the maintainability evaluation at design stage using maintainability design attributes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    15. Anita Punia, 2021. "Carbon dioxide sequestration by mines: implications for climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Parham Fami Tafreshi & Mohammad Hasan Aghdaie & Majid Behzadian & Mahdieh Ghani Abadi, 2016. "Developing a Group Decision Support System for Advertising Media Evaluation: A Case in the Middle East," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1021-1048, September.
    17. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Hu, Haixiang & Li, Xiaochun & Fang, Zhiming & Wei, Ning & Li, Qianshu, 2010. "Small-molecule gas sorption and diffusion in coal: Molecular simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2939-2944.
    19. Olga Porro & Francesc Pardo-Bosch & Núria Agell & Mónica Sánchez, 2020. "Understanding Location Decisions of Energy Multinational Enterprises within the European Smart Cities’ Context: An Integrated AHP and Extended Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, May.
    20. Yuan-Wei Du & Yi-Pin Fan, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: A Study across 30 Chinese Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:236:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221016893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.