IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v183y2019icp756-765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergoeconomic analysis applied to supercritical CO2 power systems

Author

Listed:
  • Noaman, Mohamed
  • Saade, George
  • Morosuk, Tatiana
  • Tsatsaronis, George

Abstract

Different sCO2 cycle concepts together with a newly proposed cycle configuration were simulated and a comparison was conducted to show the advantages and disadvantages of each cycle considered here. The cycles were compared using a wide range of the turbine inlet temperature, while alternating the used cooling system (air vs. wet cooling systems). The thermodynamic and cost inefficiencies within the simulated cycles were identified using exergoeconomic evaluation methods. The high exergy destruction costs in coolers indicate that the investment cost should be reduced by using different material than titanium due to its high cost. Also, the calculated product cost demonstrates a potential advantage of the proposed cycle. The analysis showed, in general, that sCO2-based cycles are promising for various applications, resulting in system efficiencies and costs that could compete with conventional power generation technologies soon. The sCO2 recompression concept and the novel sCO2 cycle showed the best results among all investigated sCO2 cycles.

Suggested Citation

  • Noaman, Mohamed & Saade, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2019. "Exergoeconomic analysis applied to supercritical CO2 power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 756-765.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:756-765
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219312939
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iverson, Brian D. & Conboy, Thomas M. & Pasch, James J. & Kruizenga, Alan M., 2013. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 957-970.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad & Rosen, Marc A., 2022. "Thermoeconomic analysis of two solid oxide fuel cell based cogeneration plants integrated with simple or modified supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Min Xie & Jian Cheng & Xiaohan Ren & Shuo Wang & Pengcheng Che & Chunwei Zhang, 2022. "System Performance Analyses of Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle for Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Guelpa, Elisa & Verda, Vittorio, 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis for the design improvement of supercritical CO2 cycle in concentrated solar plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Design analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide recuperator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 21-27.
    2. Brian T. White & Michael J. Wagner & Ty Neises & Cory Stansbury & Ben Lindley, 2021. "Modeling of Combined Lead Fast Reactor and Concentrating Solar Power Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycles to Demonstrate Feasibility, Efficiency Gains, and Cost Reductions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    4. Kim, Min Seok & Ahn, Yoonhan & Kim, Beomjoo & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2016. "Study on the supercritical CO2 power cycles for landfill gas firing gas turbine bottoming cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 893-909.
    5. Wang, Shengpeng & Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Yao, Mingyu & Peng, Botao & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Thermohydrodynamic analysis of the vertical gas wall and reheat gas wall in a 300 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    7. Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Festus Victor Bekun & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Manoj Kumar Panjwani, 2021. "Effect of Two Different Heat Transfer Fluids on the Performance of Solar Tower CSP by Comparing Recompression Supercritical CO 2 and Rankine Power Cycles, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Zhao, Yongming & Zhao, Lifeng & Wang, Bo & Zhang, Shijie & Chi, Jinling & Xiao, Yunhan, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel dual expansion coal-fueled direct-fired supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 480-495.
    9. Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Yifan & Yao, Mingyu & Yang, Yu & Han, Wanlong & Bai, Wengang, 2019. "Design assessment of a 5 MW fossil-fired supercritical CO2 power cycle pilot loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 792-804.
    10. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    11. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    12. Ma, Yuan & Xie, Gongnan & Hooman, Kamel, 2022. "Review of printed circuit heat exchangers and its applications in solar thermal energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Cheng, Kunlin & Li, Jiahui & Yu, Jianchi & Fu, Chuanjie & Qin, Jiang & Jing, Wuxing, 2023. "Novel thermoelectric generator enhanced supercritical carbon dioxide closed-Brayton-cycle power generation systems: Performance comparison and configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    14. Qin, Lei & Xie, Gongnan & Ma, Yuan & Li, Shulei, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a waste heat recovery system with a combined supercritical/transcritical CO2 cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    15. Long, Huan & Zhang, Zijun & Su, Yan, 2014. "Analysis of daily solar power prediction with data-driven approaches," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 29-37.
    16. Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2016. "Calcium looping with supercritical CO2 cycle for decarbonisation of coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 343-353.
    17. Zahedi, Rahim & Ahmadi, Abolfazl & Dashti, Reza, 2021. "Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of quadruple combined solar, biogas, SRC and ORC cycles with methane system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    18. Santini, Lorenzo & Accornero, Carlo & Cioncolini, Andrea, 2016. "On the adoption of carbon dioxide thermodynamic cycles for nuclear power conversion: A case study applied to Mochovce 3 Nuclear Power Plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 446-463.
    19. Fallah, M. & Mohammadi, Z. & Mahmoudi, S.M. Seyed, 2022. "Advanced exergy analysis of the combined S–CO2/ORC system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    20. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Too, Yen Chean Soo & Benito, Regano & McNaughton, Robbie & Stein, Wes, 2016. "Thermodynamic feasibility of alternative supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with an ejector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 49-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:756-765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.