IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v170y2019icp250-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low-carbon power dispatch with wind power based on carbon trading mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Jingliang
  • Zhou, Peng
  • Li, Chenyu
  • Guo, Xiaojun
  • Zhang, Mingming

Abstract

Low-carbon power dispatching with wind power has been attracting increasing attention recently, whereas it also encounters some difficulties under carbon trading mechanism, such as the resistance to carbon emission reduction, the fairness of carbon trading, and the disturbance of wind power uncertainty. For harmonizing these contradictions, this paper presents a stochastic dynamic economic dispatch model focusing on wind power uncertainty and carbon emission rights simultaneously, which tries to minimize total electrical energy costs under uncertainty, and to meet the specific requirement of carbon emission reductions. Moreover, several traditional allocation methods for initial carbon emission rights emphasizing the equality are introduced, and the uncertainty characterizations of wind power are discussed through the scenario-generation technique. The simulation results eventually demonstrate that the operating cost for non-cooperative mode cannot be optimized as the ratio of carbon emission reductions rises; carbon trading mechanism is beneficial for lower cost under the pressure of carbon emission reduction; carbon price ranges that suit both carbon trading parties could be deduced. Synthesizing wind power uncertainty and carbon emission rights, this study is helpful for allocating the load demand of wind power integrated system to each generating unit more scientifically and reasonably based on carbon trading mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Jingliang & Zhou, Peng & Li, Chenyu & Guo, Xiaojun & Zhang, Mingming, 2019. "Low-carbon power dispatch with wind power based on carbon trading mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 250-260.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:170:y:2019:i:c:p:250-260
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218324988
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 1157-1160, December.
    2. Flavio Menezes & Xuemei Zhang, 2016. "Regulatory Incentives for a Low-Carbon Electricity Sector in China," Discussion Papers Series 562, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    3. Biswas, Partha P. & Suganthan, P.N. & Qu, B.Y. & Amaratunga, Gehan A.J., 2018. "Multiobjective economic-environmental power dispatch with stochastic wind-solar-small hydro power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1039-1057.
    4. Jin, Jingliang & Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Peng & Qian, Shuqu & Zhang, Mingming, 2016. "Dispatching strategies for coordinating environmental awareness and risk perception in wind power integrated system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 453-463.
    5. Wang, J. & Botterud, A. & Bessa, R. & Keko, H. & Carvalho, L. & Issicaba, D. & Sumaili, J. & Miranda, V., 2011. "Wind power forecasting uncertainty and unit commitment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4014-4023.
    6. Alex Y. Lo, 2012. "Carbon emissions trading in China," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(11), pages 765-766, November.
    7. Rong, Aiying & Lahdelma, Risto, 2007. "An effective heuristic for combined heat-and-power production planning with power ramp constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 307-325, March.
    8. Fang, Guochang & Tian, Lixin & Liu, Menghe & Fu, Min & Sun, Mei, 2018. "How to optimize the development of carbon trading in China—Enlightenment from evolution rules of the EU carbon price," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1039-1049.
    9. Herrero, Carmen & Villar, Antonio, 2001. "The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 307-328, November.
    10. Brown, Mark T. & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "Emergy assessment of global renewable sources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 339(C), pages 148-156.
    11. Wang, Nannan & Chang, Yen-Chiang, 2014. "The evolution of low-carbon development strategies in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 61-70.
    12. Yuan, Jiahai & Kang, Junjie & Yu, Cong & Hu, Zhaoguang, 2011. "Energy conservation and emissions reduction in China—Progress and prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4334-4347.
    13. Li, Y.Z. & Li, K.C. & Wang, P. & Liu, Y. & Lin, X.N. & Gooi, H.B. & Li, G.F. & Cai, D.L. & Luo, Y., 2017. "Risk constrained economic dispatch with integration of wind power by multi-objective optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 810-820.
    14. Jin, Jingliang & Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Peng & Miao, Zhuang, 2014. "Environmental/economic power dispatch with wind power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 234-242.
    15. Ertugrul, Hasan Murat & Çetin, Murat & Şeker, Fahri & Dogan, Eyüp, 2015. "The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries," MPRA Paper 97539, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Mar 2016.
    16. ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 1025-1031, October.
    17. Zhang, Cheng & Wang, Qunwei & Shi, Dan & Li, Pengfei & Cai, Wanhuan, 2016. "Scenario-based potential effects of carbon trading in China: An integrated approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 177-190.
    18. Aghaei, J. & Shayanfar, H.A. & Amjady, N., 2009. "Joint market clearing in a stochastic framework considering power system security," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1675-1682, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Yujing & Wang, Yudong & Liu, Nian, 2022. "Low-carbon economic dispatch and energy sharing method of multiple Integrated Energy Systems from the perspective of System of Systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    2. Junpei Nan & Jieran Feng & Xu Deng & Chao Wang & Ke Sun & Hao Zhou, 2022. "Hierarchical Low-Carbon Economic Dispatch with Source-Load Bilateral Carbon-Trading Based on Aumann–Shapley Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Qian, Tong & Tang, Wenhu & Wu, Qinghua, 2020. "A fully decentralized dual consensus method for carbon trading power dispatch with wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Tan, Qinliang & Ding, Yihong & Zheng, Jin & Dai, Mei & Zhang, Yimei, 2021. "The effects of carbon emissions trading and renewable portfolio standards on the integrated wind–photovoltaic–thermal power-dispatching system: Real case studies in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Yan, Sizhe & Wang, Weiqing & Li, Xiaozhu & Zhao, Yi, 2022. "Research on a cross-regional robust trading strategy based on multiple market mechanisms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    6. Meng, Fanyi & Bai, Yang & Jin, Jingliang, 2021. "An advanced real-time dispatching strategy for a distributed energy system based on the reinforcement learning algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 13-24.
    7. Amigo, Pía & Cea-Echenique, Sebastián & Feijoo, Felipe, 2021. "A two stage cap-and-trade model with allowance re-trading and capacity investment: The case of the Chilean NDC targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    8. Huazhen Cao & Chong Gao & Xuan He & Yang Li & Tao Yu, 2020. "Multi-Agent Cooperation Based Reduced-Dimension Q(λ) Learning for Optimal Carbon-Energy Combined-Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Kiss, Tibor & Popovics, Steve, 2021. "Evaluation on the effectiveness of energy policies – Evidence from the carbon reductions in 25 countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Yan, Sizhe & Wang, Weiqing & Li, Xiaozhu & Lv, Haipeng & Fan, Tianyuan & Aikepaer, Sumaiya, 2023. "Stochastic optimal scheduling strategy of cross-regional carbon emissions trading and green certificate trading market based on Stackelberg game," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    11. Jin, Jingliang & Wen, Qinglan & Cheng, Siqi & Qiu, Yaru & Zhang, Xianyue & Guo, Xiaojun, 2022. "Optimization of carbon emission reduction paths in the low-carbon power dispatching process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 425-436.
    12. Jiaojiao Sun & Feng Dong, 2023. "Optimal reduction and equilibrium carbon allowance price for the thermal power industry under China’s peak carbon emissions target," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Zhou, Xu & Ma, Zhongjing & Zou, Suli & Zhang, Jinhui, 2022. "Consensus-based distributed economic dispatch for Multi Micro Energy Grid systems under coupled carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Jingliang & Zhou, Peng & Li, Chenyu & Bai, Yang & Wen, Qinglan, 2020. "Optimization of power dispatching strategies integrating management attitudes with low carbon factors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 555-568.
    2. Jin, Jingliang & Zhou, Peng & Zhang, Mingming & Yu, Xianyu & Din, Hao, 2018. "Balancing low-carbon power dispatching strategy for wind power integrated system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 914-924.
    3. Jingyi Xue, 2018. "Fair division with uncertain needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 105-136, June.
    4. Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2020. "On the difficulty of budget allocation in claims problems with indivisible items of different prices," ThE Papers 20/09, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    5. Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "On the Difficulty of Budget Allocation in Claims Problems with Indivisible Items and Prices," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1133-1159, October.
    6. José Alcalde & María Marco & José Silva, 2008. "The minimal overlap rule revisited," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 109-128, June.
    7. Martijn Ketelaars & Peter Borm & Marieke Quant, 2020. "Decentralization and mutual liability rules," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 92(3), pages 577-599, December.
    8. Lorenzo-Freire, S. & Casas-Mendez, B. & Hendrickx, R.L.P., 2005. "The Two-stage Constrained Equal Awards and Losses Rules for Multi-Issue Allocation Situation," Other publications TiSEM a94f2306-7d29-4ad6-8e81-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Cori Vilella, 2016. "The global carbon budget: a conflicting claims problem," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 693-703, June.
    10. Brânzei, R. & Dimitrov, D.A. & Pickl, S. & Tijs, S.H., 2002. "How to Cope with Division Problems under Interval Uncertainty of Claims?," Other publications TiSEM 80f71e66-45c0-41a4-9077-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Laurent-Lucchetti, Jérémy, 2009. "Rights on what is left," MPRA Paper 27285, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Emin Karagözoğlu, 2014. "A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 299-318, June.
    13. Martínez, Ricardo & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D., 2022. "Compensation and sacrifice in the probabilistic rationing of indivisible units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 740-751.
    14. William Thomson, 2012. "Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(3), pages 547-569, August.
    15. Timoner, Pere & Izquierdo, Josep M., 2016. "Rationing problems with ex-ante conditions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 46-52.
    16. Ricardo Martínez, 2007. "Strong Composition Down. Characterizations Of New And Classical Bankruptcy Rules," Working Papers. Serie AD 2007-20, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    17. Ershad Oftadeh & Mojtaba Shourian & Bahram Saghafian, 2016. "Evaluation of the Bankruptcy Approach for Water Resources Allocation Conflict Resolution at Basin Scale, Iran’s Lake Urmia Experience," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3519-3533, August.
    18. Balbina Casas-Mendez & Vito Fragnelli & Ignacio Garcìa-Jurado, 2014. "A survey of allocation rules for the museum pass problem," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(2), pages 191-205, May.
    19. LUTTENS, Roland Iwan, 2010. "Lower bounds rule!," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2010069, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    20. Biung-Ghi Ju & Juan Moreno-Ternero, 2011. "Progressive and merging-proof taxation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(1), pages 43-62, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:170:y:2019:i:c:p:250-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.