IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v164y2018icp602-614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermo-economic analysis of a novel power generation system integrating a natural gas expansion plant with a geothermal ORC in Tianjin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Sheng
  • Zhang, Yufeng
  • Yu, Xiaohui

Abstract

In this paper, a novel power generation system integrating a natural gas expansion plant with a geothermal organic Rankine cycle (ORC) was proposed. The paper begins with an introduction to the thermodynamic and economic models of the system. Secondly, contrastive analyses of three candidate working fluids were made, leading to the selection of R600 as the best fluid for the system, and the effects of gas pipeline parameters fluctuation on the system performance were originally investigated and analyzed based on the actual operating data of a natural gas PRS, located in Xiqing district, Tianjin, China. Finally, a multi-objective optimization for the system using R600 as working fluid was done to find the optimal evaporation temperature based on the TOPSIS decision-making method, and exergy loss analysis was accomplished at the optimal condition. The results indicated that the proposed system had a net profit of 3.97 M$ in the life time and a small payback period around 2.0 years at the optimal evaporation temperature of 45.5 °C where the system had a high thermal efficiency of 89.8% and exergy efficiency of 84.13%. Additionally, the condenser has the greatest potential to reduce the total exergy loss of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Sheng & Zhang, Yufeng & Yu, Xiaohui, 2018. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel power generation system integrating a natural gas expansion plant with a geothermal ORC in Tianjin, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 602-614.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:164:y:2018:i:c:p:602-614
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218318024
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kostowski, Wojciech J. & Usón, Sergio, 2013. "Thermoeconomic assessment of a natural gas expansion system integrated with a co-generation unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-66.
    2. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    3. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.
    4. He, T.B. & Ju, Y.L., 2014. "A novel process for small-scale pipeline natural gas liquefaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 17-24.
    5. Madhawa Hettiarachchi, H.D. & Golubovic, Mihajlo & Worek, William M. & Ikegami, Yasuyuki, 2007. "Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1698-1706.
    6. Bisio, G., 1995. "Thermodynamic analysis of the use of pressure exergy of natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 161-167.
    7. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    8. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    9. Freeman, James & Hellgardt, Klaus & Markides, Christos N., 2017. "Working fluid selection and electrical performance optimisation of a domestic solar-ORC combined heat and power system for year-round operation in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 291-303.
    10. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    11. Sayyaadi, Hoseyn & Mehrabipour, Reza, 2012. "Efficiency enhancement of a gas turbine cycle using an optimized tubular recuperative heat exchanger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 362-375.
    12. Aljundi, Isam H., 2011. "Effect of dry hydrocarbons and critical point temperature on the efficiencies of organic Rankine cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1196-1202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhen Zhao & Guangxiong Qin & Huijuan Chen & Linchao Yang & Songhe Geng & Ronghua Wen & Liang Zhang, 2022. "Numerical Simulation and Economic Evaluation of Wellbore Self-Circulation for Heat Extraction Using Cluster Horizontal Wells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Baydar, Ceyhun & Koç, Yıldız & Yağlı, Hüseyin & Koç, Ali & Depci̇, Tolga & Aygün, Mustafa Kemal, 2023. "Experimental detection of inadequacies and improvements for a geothermal power plant using single shaft double turbine binary Organic Rankine cycle as power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. DeLovato, Nicolas & Sundarnath, Kavin & Cvijovic, Lazar & Kota, Krishna & Kuravi, Sarada, 2019. "A review of heat recovery applications for solar and geothermal power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Wang, Yi & Zhang, Liang & Cui, Guodong & Kang, Jun & Ren, Shaoran, 2019. "Geothermal development and power generation by circulating water and isobutane via a closed-loop horizontal well from hot dry rocks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 909-922.
    5. Lee, Sehyeok & Kim, Dohoon & Ha, Honggeun & Kim, Min Soo, 2023. "Pressure energy recovery of LNG integrated with multi-stage feedwater fuel preheaters in a combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Jankowski, Marcin & Borsukiewicz, Aleksandra & Wiśniewski, Sławomir & Hooman, Kamel, 2020. "Multi-objective analysis of an influence of a geothermal water salinity on optimal operating parameters in low-temperature ORC power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Hsieh, Jui-Ching & Lai, Chun-Chieh & Chen, Yen-Hsun, 2022. "Thermoeconomic analysis of a waste heat recovery system with fluctuating flue gas scenario," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    8. Zinsalo, Joël M. & Lamarche, Louis & Raymond, Jasmin, 2022. "Performance analysis and working fluid selection of an Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant coupled to an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    9. Wu, Zhangxiang & Wang, Xiaoyan & Sha, Li & Li, Xiaoqiong & Yang, Xiaochen & Ma, Xuelian & Zhang, Yufeng, 2021. "Performance analysis and multi-objective optimization of the high-temperature cascade heat pump system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    10. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Javier Cárdenas Gutierrez & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Exergy, Economic, and Life-Cycle Assessment of ORC System for Waste Heat Recovery in a Natural Gas Internal Combustion Engine," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Shuozhuo Hu & Zhen Yang & Jian Li & Yuanyuan Duan, 2021. "A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.
    12. Choi, Hong Wone & Na, Sun-Ik & Hong, Sung Bin & Chung, Yoong & Kim, Dong Kyu & Kim, Min Soo, 2021. "Optimal design of organic Rankine cycle recovering LNG cold energy with finite heat exchanger size," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Cui, Guodong & Pei, Shufeng & Rui, Zhenhua & Dou, Bin & Ning, Fulong & Wang, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Whole process analysis of geothermal exploitation and power generation from a depleted high-temperature gas reservoir by recycling CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    14. Piero Danieli & Gianluca Carraro & Andrea Lazzaretto, 2020. "Thermodynamic and Economic Feasibility of Energy Recovery from Pressure Reduction Stations in Natural Gas Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    2. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    3. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Mikelis, Angelos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic performance of CO2 and ultra-low GWP refrigerant mixtures as working fluids in ORC for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Chatzopoulou, Maria Anna & Markides, Christos N., 2018. "Thermodynamic optimisation of a high-electrical efficiency integrated internal combustion engine – Organic Rankine cycle combined heat and power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1229-1251.
    5. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    6. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    7. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    8. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    9. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    10. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    11. Song, Chongzhi & Gu, Mingyan & Miao, Zheng & Liu, Chao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Effect of fluid dryness and critical temperature on trans-critical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 97-109.
    12. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    13. Rech, Sergio & Zandarin, Simone & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2017. "Design and off-design models of single and two-stage ORC systems on board a LNG carrier for the search of the optimal performance and control strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 221-241.
    14. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    15. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng & Cao, Liyan & Wang, Yu, 2016. "Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 470-487.
    16. Feng, Yongqiang & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis and thermoeconomic comparison of ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 664-677.
    17. Samadi, Fereshteh & Kazemi, Neda, 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis of zeotropic mixture on the new proposed organic Rankine cycle for energy production from geothermal resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1250-1265.
    18. White, M.T. & Oyewunmi, O.A. & Chatzopoulou, M.A. & Pantaleo, A.M. & Haslam, A.J. & Markides, C.N., 2018. "Computer-aided working-fluid design, thermodynamic optimisation and thermoeconomic assessment of ORC systems for waste-heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1181-1198.
    19. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Grispos, Victoras & Karellas, Sotirios, 2021. "Exergetic efficiency potential of double-stage ORCs with zeotropic mixtures of natural hydrocarbons and CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    20. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1400-1414.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:164:y:2018:i:c:p:602-614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.