IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v151y2018icp826-838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO2 mitigation costs of catalytic methane decomposition

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xiang
  • Kätelhön, Arne
  • Sorda, Giovanni
  • Helmin, Marta
  • Rose, Marcus
  • Bardow, André
  • Madlener, Reinhard
  • Palkovits, Regina
  • Mitsos, Alexander

Abstract

Catalytic methane decomposition (CMD) is promising for producing hydrogen without direct CO2 emissions. We estimate the CO2 mitigation costs associated with CMD for hydrogen production and subsequent power generation in a fuel cell. The overall CO2 emissions and economic viability are evaluated based on four scenarios: whether the by-product carbon can be sold or must be discarded into landfill; whether the catalyst can be recycled or not. CO2 emission savings and the associated costs of CMD concept are compared to the combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant with and without carbon capture and storage (CCS). The results illustrate that the profitability of the concept as well as the ensuing CO2 abatement costs strongly depend on the ability to separate the catalysts from the carbon generated during the CMD. The life-cycle CO2 emissions per unit of electricity output of a CCGT plant with CCS are marginally higher than those generated in the CMD with perfect separation and regeneration of the catalysts. The levelized costs of electricity generation (LCOE) of CMD without selling the by-product are also higher than for CCGT with CCS. In contrast, the CMD can be highly profitable assuming selling the by-product carbon at current prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xiang & Kätelhön, Arne & Sorda, Giovanni & Helmin, Marta & Rose, Marcus & Bardow, André & Madlener, Reinhard & Palkovits, Regina & Mitsos, Alexander, 2018. "CO2 mitigation costs of catalytic methane decomposition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 826-838.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:151:y:2018:i:c:p:826-838
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218305413
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul L. Joskow, 2011. "Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generating Technologies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 238-241, May.
    2. Abánades, A. & Rubbia, C. & Salmieri, D., 2012. "Technological challenges for industrial development of hydrogen production based on methane cracking," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 359-363.
    3. Ashik, U.P.M. & Wan Daud, W.M.A. & Abbas, Hazzim F., 2015. "Production of greenhouse gas free hydrogen by thermocatalytic decomposition of methane – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 221-256.
    4. Viebahn, Peter & Daniel, Vallentin & Samuel, Höller, 2012. "Integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the German power sector and comparison with the deployment of renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 238-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ray, Debjyoti & Nepak, Devadutta & Vinodkumar, T. & Subrahmanyam, Ch., 2019. "g-C3N4 promoted DBD plasma assisted dry reforming of methane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 630-638.
    2. Konrad, Kai A. & Lommerud, Kjell Erik, 2021. "Effective climate policy needs non-combustion uses for hydrocarbons," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Wang, Zhaohua & Zhang, Hongzhi & Li, Hao & Wang, Bo & Cui, Qi & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "Economic impact and energy transformation of different effort-sharing schemes to pursue 2 ℃ warming limit in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    4. Alves, Luís & Pereira, Vítor & Lagarteira, Tiago & Mendes, Adélio, 2021. "Catalytic methane decomposition to boost the energy transition: Scientific and technological advancements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Seunghyun Cheon & Manhee Byun & Dongjun Lim & Hyunjun Lee & Hankwon Lim, 2021. "Parametric Study for Thermal and Catalytic Methane Pyrolysis for Hydrogen Production: Techno-Economic and Scenario Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Chen, Zong & Zhang, Rongjun & Xia, Guofu & Wu, Yu & Li, Hongwei & Sun, Zhao & Sun, Zhiqiang, 2021. "Vacuum promoted methane decomposition for hydrogen production with carbon separation: Parameter optimization and economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neupane, Deependra & Kafle, Sagar & Karki, Kaji Ram & Kim, Dae Hyun & Pradhan, Prajal, 2022. "Solar and wind energy potential assessment at provincial level in Nepal: Geospatial and economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 278-291.
    2. Durmaz, Tunç, 2016. "Precautionary Storage in Electricity Markets," Discussion Papers 2016/5, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    3. Carsten Helm & Mathias Mier, 2020. "Steering the Energy Transition in a World of Intermittent Electricity Supply: Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Renewables Storage," ifo Working Paper Series 330, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    4. Behrang Shirizadeh, Quentin Perrier, and Philippe Quirion, 2022. "How Sensitive are Optimal Fully Renewable Power Systems to Technology Cost Uncertainty?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    5. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Simshauser, P., 2019. "On the impact of government-initiated CfD’s in Australia’s National Electricity Market," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1901, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Karsten Neuhoff & Nils May & Jörn C. Richstein, 2018. "Renewable Energy Policy in the Age of Falling Technology Costs," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1746, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Jeffrey C. Peters & Thomas W. Hertel, 2017. "Achieving the Clean Power Plan 2030 CO2 Target with the New Normal in Natural Gas Prices," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 5).
    10. Alexis Tantet & Philippe Drobinski, 2021. "A Minimal System Cost Minimization Model for Variable Renewable Energy Integration: Application to France and Comparison to Mean-Variance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.
    11. Gawel, Erik & Lehmann, Paul & Purkus, Alexandra & Söderholm, Patrik & Witte, Katherina, 2017. "Rationales for technology-specific RES support and their relevance for German policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 16-26.
    12. Pejman Bahramian, 2021. "Integration of wind power into an electricity system using pumped-storage: Economic challenges and stakeholder impacts," Working Paper 1480, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    13. Severin Borenstein & James Bushnell, 2015. "The US Electricity Industry After 20 Years of Restructuring," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 437-463, August.
    14. Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2013. "Designing learning curves for carbon capture based on chemical absorption according to the minimum work of separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 383-391.
    15. Rubio-Domingo, G. & Linares, P., 2021. "The future investment costs of offshore wind: An estimation based on auction results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. René Aïd & Matteo Basei & Huyên Pham, 2020. "A McKean–Vlasov approach to distributed electricity generation development," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(2), pages 269-310, April.
    17. Montrone, Lorenzo & Steckel, Jan Christoph & Kalkuhl, Matthias, 2022. "The type of power capacity matters for economic development – Evidence from a global panel," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    18. La Monaca, Sarah & Ryan, Lisa, 2017. "Solar PV where the sun doesn’t shine: Estimating the economic impacts of support schemes for residential PV with detailed net demand profiling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 731-741.
    19. Paul Simshauser & Farhad Billimoria & Craig Rogers, 2021. "Optimising VRE plant capacity in Renewable Energy Zones," Working Papers EPRG2121, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    20. Chen, Hao & Gao, Xin-Ya & Liu, Jian-Yu & Zhang, Qian & Yu, Shiwei & Kang, Jia-Ning & Yan, Rui & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2020. "The grid parity analysis of onshore wind power in China: A system cost perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-30.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:151:y:2018:i:c:p:826-838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.