IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v115y2016ip1p626-636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the effects of ultrasound power and reactor dimension on the biodiesel production yield: Comparison of prediction abilities between response surface methodology (RSM) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)

Author

Listed:
  • Mostafaei, Mostafa
  • Javadikia, Hossein
  • Naderloo, Leila

Abstract

Biodiesel is as an alternative petro-diesel fuel produced from the renewable resources. The use of novel technologies such as ultrasound technology for biodiesel production intensifies the reaction and reduces the process cost. The present study is aimed to evaluate and compare the prediction and simulating efficiency of the response surface methodology (RSM) and adaptive Neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approaches for modeling the transesterification yield achieved in ultrasonic reactor. The influence of independent variables (reactor diameter, liquid height and ultrasound intensity) on the conversion of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) was investigated by Box-Behnken design of RSM and two ANFIS approaches (hybrid and back-propagation optimization methods). All models were compared statistically based on the training and validation data set by the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean squares error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean relative percent deviation (MRPD). The calculated R2 for RSM and two ANFIS models were 0.9669, 0.9812 and 0.9808, respectively. All models indicated good predictions, however, the ANFIS models were more precise compared to the RSM model, which proves that the ANFIS is a powerful tool for modeling and optimizing FAME production in ultrasound reactor.

Suggested Citation

  • Mostafaei, Mostafa & Javadikia, Hossein & Naderloo, Leila, 2016. "Modeling the effects of ultrasound power and reactor dimension on the biodiesel production yield: Comparison of prediction abilities between response surface methodology (RSM) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 626-636.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:115:y:2016:i:p1:p:626-636
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216312695
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Response Surface Methodology," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael C Fu (ed.), Handbook of Simulation Optimization, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 81-104, Springer.
    2. Wong, Ka In & Wong, Pak Kin & Cheung, Chun Shun & Vong, Chi Man, 2013. "Modeling and optimization of biodiesel engine performance using advanced machine learning methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 519-528.
    3. Yaakob, Zahira & Mohammad, Masita & Alherbawi, Mohammad & Alam, Zahangir & Sopian, Kamaruzaman, 2013. "Overview of the production of biodiesel from Waste cooking oil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 184-193.
    4. Singh, S.P. & Singh, Dipti, 2010. "Biodiesel production through the use of different sources and characterization of oils and their esters as the substitute of diesel: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 200-216, January.
    5. Yin, Xiulian & Ma, Haile & You, Qinghong & Wang, Zhenbin & Chang, Jinke, 2012. "Comparison of four different enhancing methods for preparing biodiesel through transesterification of sunflower oil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 320-325.
    6. Oh, Pin Pin & Lau, Harrison Lik Nang & Chen, Junghui & Chong, Mei Fong & Choo, Yuen May, 2012. "A review on conventional technologies and emerging process intensification (PI) methods for biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5131-5145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iftikhar Ahmad & Ahsan Ayub & Uzair Ibrahim & Mansoor Khan Khattak & Manabu Kano, 2018. "Data-Based Sensing and Stochastic Analysis of Biodiesel Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Iftikhar Ahmad & Adil Sana & Manabu Kano & Izzat Iqbal Cheema & Brenno C. Menezes & Junaid Shahzad & Zahid Ullah & Muzammil Khan & Asad Habib, 2021. "Machine Learning Applications in Biofuels’ Life Cycle: Soil, Feedstock, Production, Consumption, and Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Pirmoradi, Neda & Ghaneian, Mohammad Taghi & Ehrampoush, Mohammad Hassan & Salmani, Mohammad Hossein & Hatami, Behnam, 2021. "The conversion of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater sludge into biodiesel: Process modeling and optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1236-1249.
    4. Jisieike, Chiazor Faustina & Ishola, Niyi Babatunde & Latinwo, Lekan M. & Betiku, Eriola, 2023. "Crude rubber seed oil esterification using a solid catalyst: Optimization by hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    5. Muhammad, Gul & Potchamyou Ngatcha, Ange Douglas & Lv, Yongkun & Xiong, Wenlong & El-Badry, Yaser A. & Asmatulu, Eylem & Xu, Jingliang & Alam, Md Asraful, 2022. "Enhanced biodiesel production from wet microalgae biomass optimized via response surface methodology and artificial neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 753-764.
    6. Bahman Najafi & Sina Faizollahzadeh Ardabili & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Timon Rabczuk, 2018. "An Intelligent Artificial Neural Network-Response Surface Methodology Method for Accessing the Optimum Biodiesel and Diesel Fuel Blending Conditions in a Diesel Engine from the Viewpoint of Exergy and," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Luqman Razzaq & Muhammad Farooq & M. A. Mujtaba & Farooq Sher & Muhammad Farhan & Muhammad Tahir Hassan & Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar & A. E. Atabani & M. A. Kalam & Muhammad Imran, 2020. "Modeling Viscosity and Density of Ethanol-Diesel-Biodiesel Ternary Blends for Sustainable Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Jiang, Yuliang & Wang, Xinli & Zhao, Hongxia & Wang, Lei & Yin, Xiaohong & Jia, Lei, 2020. "Dynamic modeling and economic model predictive control of a liquid desiccant air conditioning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Morshedizadeh, Majid & Kordestani, Mojtaba & Carriveau, Rupp & Ting, David S.-K. & Saif, Mehrdad, 2017. "Application of imputation techniques and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System to predict wind turbine power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 394-404.
    10. Naderloo, Leila & Javadikia, Hossein & Mostafaei, Mostafa, 2017. "Modeling the energy ratio and productivity of biodiesel with different reactor dimensions and ultrasonic power using ANFIS," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 56-64.
    11. Sina Faizollahzadeh Ardabili & Bahman Najafi & Meysam Alizamir & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Timon Rabczuk, 2018. "Using SVM-RSM and ELM-RSM Approaches for Optimizing the Production Process of Methyl and Ethyl Esters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Mohadesi, Majid & Aghel, Babak & Maleki, Mahmoud & Ansari, Ahmadreza, 2019. "Production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil using a homogeneous catalyst: Study of semi-industrial pilot of microreactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 677-682.
    13. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Dadak, Ali, 2017. "Fuzzy modeling and optimization of the synthesis of biodiesel from waste cooking oil (WCO) by a low power, high frequency piezo-ultrasonic reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 65-78.
    14. Gergo Pinter & Imre Felde & Amir Mosavi & Pedram Ghamisi & Richard Gloaguen, 2020. "COVID-19 Pandemic Prediction for Hungary; A Hybrid Machine Learning Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Işık, Erdem & Inallı, Mustafa, 2018. "Artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems approaches to forecast the meteorological data for HVAC: The case of cities for Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 7-16.
    16. Luqman Razzaq & Shahid Imran & Zahid Anwar & Muhammad Farooq & Muhammad Mujtaba Abbas & Haris Mehmood Khan & Tahir Asif & Muhammad Amjad & Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar & Nabeel Shaukat & I. M. Rizwanul , 2020. "Maximising Yield and Engine Efficiency Using Optimised Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takase, Mohammed & Zhao, Ting & Zhang, Min & Chen, Yao & Liu, Hongyang & Yang, Liuqing & Wu, Xiangyang, 2015. "An expatiate review of neem, jatropha, rubber and karanja as multipurpose non-edible biodiesel resources and comparison of their fuel, engine and emission properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 495-520.
    2. Chakraborty, Rajat & Gupta, Abhishek.K. & Chowdhury, Ratul, 2014. "Conversion of slaughterhouse and poultry farm animal fats and wastes to biodiesel: Parametric sensitivity and fuel quality assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 120-134.
    3. Yang, Liuqing & Takase, Mohammed & Zhang, Min & Zhao, Ting & Wu, Xiangyang, 2014. "Potential non-edible oil feedstock for biodiesel production in Africa: A survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 461-477.
    4. Singh, Paramvir & Varun, & Chauhan, S.R., 2016. "Carbonyl and aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from diesel engine exhaust using different feedstock: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 269-291.
    5. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, Amin & Amin, Nor Aishah Saidina & Mazaheri, Hossein, 2013. "A review on novel processes of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 683-710.
    6. Iftikhar Ahmad & Adil Sana & Manabu Kano & Izzat Iqbal Cheema & Brenno C. Menezes & Junaid Shahzad & Zahid Ullah & Muzammil Khan & Asad Habib, 2021. "Machine Learning Applications in Biofuels’ Life Cycle: Soil, Feedstock, Production, Consumption, and Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Mohammad Anwar & Mohammad G. Rasul & Nanjappa Ashwath & Md Mofijur Rahman, 2018. "Optimisation of Second-Generation Biodiesel Production from Australian Native Stone Fruit Oil Using Response Surface Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Verma, Puneet & Sharma, M.P. & Dwivedi, Gaurav, 2016. "Impact of alcohol on biodiesel production and properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 319-333.
    9. Bhuiya, M.M.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Ashwath, N. & Azad, A.K., 2016. "Prospects of 2nd generation biodiesel as a sustainable fuel—Part: 1 selection of feedstocks, oil extraction techniques and conversion technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1109-1128.
    10. Mujtaba, M.A. & Masjuki, H.H. & Kalam, M.A. & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Gul, M. & Farooq, M. & Soudagar, Manzoore Elahi M. & Ahmed, Waqar & Harith, M.H. & Yusoff, M.N.A.M., 2020. "Ultrasound-assisted process optimization and tribological characteristics of biodiesel from palm-sesame oil via response surface methodology and extreme learning machine - Cuckoo search," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 202-214.
    11. Behdad Shadidi & Gholamhassan Najafi & Mohammad Ali Zolfigol, 2022. "A Review of the Existing Potentials in Biodiesel Production in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Borugadda, Venu Babu & Goud, Vaibhav V., 2012. "Biodiesel production from renewable feedstocks: Status and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4763-4784.
    13. Pourzolfaghar, Hamed & Abnisa, Faisal & Daud, Wan Mohd Ashri Wan & Aroua, Mohamed Kheireddine, 2016. "A review of the enzymatic hydroesterification process for biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 245-257.
    14. Sanjid, A. & Masjuki, H.H. & Kalam, M.A. & Rahman, S.M. Ashrafur & Abedin, M.J. & Palash, S.M., 2013. "Impact of palm, mustard, waste cooking oil and Calophyllum inophyllum biofuels on performance and emission of CI engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 664-682.
    15. Praveena, V. & Martin, Leenus Jesu & Matijošius, Jonas & Aloui, Fethi & Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan & Varuvel, Edwin Geo, 2024. "A systematic review on biofuel production and utilization from algae and waste feedstocks– a circular economy approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Yaakob, Zahira & Narayanan, Binitha N. & Padikkaparambil, Silija & Unni K., Surya & Akbar P., Mohammed, 2014. "A review on the oxidation stability of biodiesel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 136-153.
    17. Yu, Xunzhao & Zhu, Ling & Wang, Yan & Filev, Dimitar & Yao, Xin, 2022. "Internal combustion engine calibration using optimization algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    18. Mendonça, Iasmin M. & Paes, Orlando A.R.L. & Maia, Paulo J.S. & Souza, Mayane P. & Almeida, Richardson A. & Silva, Cláudia C. & Duvoisin, Sérgio & de Freitas, Flávio A., 2019. "New heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production from waste tucumã peels (Astrocaryum aculeatum Meyer): Parameters optimization study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 103-110.
    19. Hoseini, S.S. & Najafi, G. & Ghobadian, B. & Rahimi, A. & Yusaf, Talal & Mamat, Rizalman & Sidik, N.A.C. & Azmi, W.H., 2017. "Effects of biodiesel fuel obtained from Salvia macrosiphon oil (ultrasonic-assisted) on performance and emissions of diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 289-296.
    20. Marina Corral Bobadilla & Roberto Fernández Martínez & Rubén Lostado Lorza & Fátima Somovilla Gómez & Eliseo P. Vergara González, 2018. "Optimizing Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil Using Genetic Algorithm-Based Support Vector Machines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:115:y:2016:i:p1:p:626-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.