IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v236y2019icp850-866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic and environmental analyses of a novel, sustainable process for production of liquid fuels using helium heat transfer

Author

Listed:
  • Hoseinzade, Leila
  • Adams, Thomas A.

Abstract

In this paper, several new processes are proposed which co-generate electricity and liquid fuels (such as diesel, gasoline, or dimethyl ether) from biomass, natural gas and heat from a high temperature gas-cooled reactor. This carbonless heat provides the required energy to drive an endothermic steam methane reforming process, which yields H2-rich syngas (H2/CO > 6) with lower greenhouse gas emissions than traditional steam methane reforming processes. Since downstream Fischer-Tropsch, methanol, or dimethyl ether synthesis processes require an H2/CO ratio of around 2, biomass gasification is integrated into the process. Biomass-derived syngas is sufficiently H2-lean such that blending it with the steam methane reforming derived syngas yields a syngas of the appropriate H2/CO ratio of around 2. In a prior work, we also demonstrated that integrating carbonless heat with combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane is a promising option to produce a syngas with proper H2/CO ratio for Fischer-Tropsch and methanol/dimethyl ether applications. In this study, we presented another novel design called gas-nuclear-to-liquids process which can be applied for liquid fuel production without needing H2/CO adjustment. Chemical process simulations of several candidate processes were developed, which used the rigorous multi-scale, two-dimensional, heterogeneous models for the carbonless-heat-powered steam methane reforming and mixed reforming of methane processes developed in prior works in gPROMS. In addition, 1D process models within Aspen Plus were also used (Aspen Plus simulation and gPROMS models are provided to the reader). The performance of the presented systems was compared with a biomass-gas-to-liquids plant where heat from gasification drives the steam methane reforming instead of the high temperature gas-cooled reactor. Techno-economic analyses and greenhouse gas life cycle analyses of each case were completed to investigate the economic and environmental impacts of the proposed processes. Optional carbon capture and sequestration technology is also considered. The analysis demonstrates that carbonless heat integration leads to thermal efficiencies of up to 55% (high heating value based) as well as suitable profits in the right market conditions. It is also found that net negative life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of the final products can be achieved owing to use of biomass, carbonless heat, and carbon capture and sequestration. Even without carbon capture and sequestration, the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of the proposed process are 25–57% lower than traditional natural gas-to-dimethyl ether and coal-to- dimethyl ether processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoseinzade, Leila & Adams, Thomas A., 2019. "Techno-economic and environmental analyses of a novel, sustainable process for production of liquid fuels using helium heat transfer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 850-866.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:236:y:2019:i:c:p:850-866
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918318245
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jana, Kuntal & Ray, Avishek & Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri & Assadi, Mohsen & De, Sudipta, 2017. "Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution – A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 88-111.
    2. Liu, Guangrui & Yan, Beibei & Chen, Guanyi, 2013. "Technical review on jet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 59-70.
    3. Liu, Sen & Gao, Hongxia & He, Chuan & Liang, Zhiwu, 2019. "Experimental evaluation of highly efficient primary and secondary amines with lower energy by a novel method for post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 443-452.
    4. Serra, Luis M. & Lozano, Miguel-Angel & Ramos, Jose & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A., 2009. "Polygeneration and efficient use of natural resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 575-586.
    5. Kieffer, Matthew & Brown, Tristan & Brown, Robert C., 2016. "Flex fuel polygeneration: Integrating renewable natural gas into Fischer–Tropsch synthesis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 208-218.
    6. Jang, Won-Jun & Jeong, Dae-Woon & Shim, Jae-Oh & Kim, Hak-Min & Roh, Hyun-Seog & Son, In Hyuk & Lee, Seung Jae, 2016. "Combined steam and carbon dioxide reforming of methane and side reactions: Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis and experimental application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 80-91.
    7. Xiaosong Zhang & Sheng Li & Hongguang Jin, 2014. "A Polygeneration System Based on Multi-Input Chemical Looping Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-12, November.
    8. Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2016. "Process modeling of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1616-1632.
    9. Yaser Khojasteh Salkuyeh & Thomas A. Adams II, 2015. "Co-Production of Olefins, Fuels, and Electricity from Conventional Pipeline Gas and Shale Gas with Near-Zero CO 2 Emissions. Part I: Process Development and Technical Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Clausen, Lasse R. & Elmegaard, Brian & Houbak, Niels, 2010. "Technoeconomic analysis of a low CO2 emission dimethyl ether (DME) plant based on gasification of torrefied biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4831-4842.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salas, D.A. & Boero, A.J. & Ramirez, A.D., 2024. "Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I. & Adams, Thomas A., 2022. "Global optimization of a hybrid waste tire and natural gas feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Greeff, Isabella L., 2022. "Using synthesis gas heat to produce work via an externally fired gas power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    4. Regis, Francesco & Monteverde, Alessandro Hugo Antonio & Fino, Debora, 2023. "A techno-economic assessment of bioethanol production from switchgrass through biomass gasification and syngas fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Calise, Francesco & de Notaristefani di Vastogirardi, Giulio & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2018. "Simulation of polygeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 290-337.
    2. Hosan, Shahadat & Rahman, Md Matiar & Karmaker, Shamal Chandra & Saha, Bidyut Baran, 2023. "Energy subsidies and energy technology innovation: Policies for polygeneration systems diffusion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    3. Francesca Ceglia & Adriano Macaluso & Elisa Marrasso & Carlo Roselli & Laura Vanoli, 2020. "Energy, Environmental, and Economic Analyses of Geothermal Polygeneration System Using Dynamic Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-34, September.
    4. Salkuyeh, Yaser Khojasteh & Elkamel, Ali & Thé, Jesse & Fowler, Michael, 2016. "Development and techno-economic analysis of an integrated petroleum coke, biomass, and natural gas polygeneration process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 861-874.
    5. Mevawala, Chirag & Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2019. "Techno-economic optimization of shale gas to dimethyl ether production processes via direct and indirect synthesis routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 119-134.
    6. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I. & Adams, Thomas A., 2022. "Global optimization of a hybrid waste tire and natural gas feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    7. Luis Gabriel Gesteira & Javier Uche, 2022. "A Novel Polygeneration System Based on a Solar-Assisted Desiccant Cooling System for Residential Buildings: An Energy and Environmental Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Jana, Kuntal & Ray, Avishek & Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri & Assadi, Mohsen & De, Sudipta, 2017. "Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution – A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 88-111.
    9. Jiang, Yuan & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of direct coal-biomass to liquids (CBTL) plants with shale gas utilization and CO2 capture and storage (CCS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 433-448.
    10. Pina, Eduardo A. & Lozano, Miguel A. & Ramos, José C. & Serra, Luis M., 2020. "Tackling thermal integration in the synthesis of polygeneration systems for buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    11. Segurado, R. & Pereira, S. & Correia, D. & Costa, M., 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of a trigeneration system based on biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 501-514.
    12. Pina, Eduardo A. & Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis M., 2021. "Assessing the influence of legal constraints on the integration of renewable energy technologies in polygeneration systems for buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Murugan, S. & Horák, Bohumil, 2016. "Tri and polygeneration systems - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1032-1051.
    14. Zhang, Chi & Hui, Xin & Lin, Yuzhen & Sung, Chih-Jen, 2016. "Recent development in studies of alternative jet fuel combustion: Progress, challenges, and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 120-138.
    15. Oyekale, Joseph & Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio, 2020. "Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    16. Vega, F. & Baena-Moreno, F.M. & Gallego Fernández, Luz M. & Portillo, E. & Navarrete, B. & Zhang, Zhien, 2020. "Current status of CO2 chemical absorption research applied to CCS: Towards full deployment at industrial scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    17. Xiang, Dong & Xiang, Junjie & Sun, Zhe & Cao, Yan, 2017. "The integrated coke-oven gas and pulverized coke gasification for methanol production with highly efficient hydrogen utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 78-91.
    18. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.
    19. Kerme, Esa Dube & Orfi, Jamel & Fung, Alan S. & Salilih, Elias M. & Khan, Salah Ud-Din & Alshehri, Hassan & Ali, Emad & Alrasheed, Mohammed, 2020. "Energetic and exergetic performance analysis of a solar driven power, desalination and cooling poly-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    20. Henrik Von Storch & Sonja Becker-Hardt & Christian Sattler, 2018. "(Solar) Mixed Reforming of Methane: Potential and Limits in Utilizing CO 2 as Feedstock for Syngas Production—A Thermodynamic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:236:y:2019:i:c:p:850-866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.