IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v107y2016icp580-594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic modelling for coal bed methane production and electricity generation from deep virgin coal seams

Author

Listed:
  • Sarhosis, V.
  • Jaya, A.A.
  • Thomas, H.R.

Abstract

An investigation of the economic potential for recovering methane from virgin coal seams for electricity production at a study area in South Wales, UK, is presented. Utilizing the coal bed methane gas to fuel a CCGT (combined cycle gas turbine) will offer a low carbon option compared to fossil fuel fired power generation for the study area. Cost effectiveness is analysed using both technical and economic data allowing for integration connecting the various sub-processes to the surface processes up to the production of electricity. The model considers both reservoir conditions and engineering factors to calculate the EUR (enhanced ultimate recovery), the CAPEX (capital expenditure) and the OPEX (operational expenditure) of the coupled CBM-CCGT process. The projected UK Navigant gas prices and the DECC electricity prices are then used to estimate the LCOE (levelised costs of electricity) and obtain the financial performance of the coupled CBM-CCGT process. Calculation results showed that the probable cost of electricity (LCOE) amounts to 37 £/MWh and the return on investment could be in the excess of 77%. For the selected study area, the coupled CBM-CCGT process could potentially be an economic option for power generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarhosis, V. & Jaya, A.A. & Thomas, H.R., 2016. "Economic modelling for coal bed methane production and electricity generation from deep virgin coal seams," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 580-594.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:107:y:2016:i:c:p:580-594
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216304625
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hammond, G.P. & Akwe, S.S. Ondo & Williams, S., 2011. "Techno-economic appraisal of fossil-fuelled power generation systems with carbon dioxide capture and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 975-984.
    2. McGlade, Christophe & Speirs, Jamie & Sorrell, Steve, 2013. "Unconventional gas – A review of regional and global resource estimates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 571-584.
    3. Khalilpour, Rajab & Karimi, I.A., 2012. "Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 317-328.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evans, Neil & Jones, Calvin & Munday, Max & Song, Meng, 2019. "Economic effects in the UK periphery from unconventional gas development: Evidence from Wales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1037-1046.
    2. Zhao, Jingyu & Wang, Tao & Deng, Jun & Shu, Chi-Min & Zeng, Qiang & Guo, Tao & Zhang, Yuxuan, 2020. "Microcharacteristic analysis of CH4 emissions under different conditions during coal spontaneous combustion with high-temperature oxidation and in situ FTIR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Tim A. Moore & Mike C. Friederich, 2021. "Defining Uncertainty: Comparing Resource/Reserve Classification Systems for Coal and Coal Seam Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-35, September.
    4. Xi, Xian & Jiang, Shuguang & Shi, Quanlin, 2023. "Study on the flow and bonding-reinforcement characteristics of composite foam slurry material used to block mine leakage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    5. Kang Yanfei & Fan Jinyang & Liu Peng & Du Junsheng & Jiang Deyi, 2021. "Permeability evolution in tectonic coal: The roles of moisture and pressurized water‐injection," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(4), pages 633-646, August.
    6. Dai, Shijie & Xu, Jiang & Jia, Li & Chen, Jieren & Yan, Fazhi & Chen, Yuexia & Peng, Shoujian, 2023. "On the 3D fluid behavior during CBM coproduction in a multi pressure system: Insights from experimental analysis and mathematical models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    7. Wang, Yiwei & Deng, Ye & Guo, Xuqiang & Sun, Qiang & Liu, Aixian & Zhang, Guangqing & Yue, Gang & Yang, Lanying, 2018. "Experimental and modeling investigation on separation of methane from coal seam gas (CSG) using hydrate formation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 377-395.
    8. Fan, Lurong & Wang, Binyu & Song, Xiaoling, 2023. "An authority-enterprise equilibrium differentiated subsidy mechanism for promoting coalbed methane extraction in multiple coal seams," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khalilpour, Rajab, 2014. "Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: Retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 172-186.
    2. Yin, Hong & Zhou, Junping & Xian, Xuefu & Jiang, Yongdong & Lu, Zhaohui & Tan, Jingqiang & Liu, Guojun, 2017. "Experimental study of the effects of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation on the mechanical characteristics of organic-rich shales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 84-95.
    3. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    4. Peng, Benhong & Zhao, Yinyin & Elahi, Ehsan & Wan, Anxia, 2023. "Can third-party market cooperation solve the dilemma of emissions reduction? A case study of energy investment project conflict analysis in the context of carbon neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    5. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.
    6. Tunstall, Thomas, 2015. "Iterative Bass Model forecasts for unconventional oil production in the Eagle Ford Shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 580-588.
    7. Lund, Henrik & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2012. "The role of Carbon Capture and Storage in a future sustainable energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 469-476.
    8. Ikonnikova, Svetlana & Gülen, Gürcan & Browning, John & Tinker, Scott W., 2015. "Profitability of shale gas drilling: A case study of the Fayetteville shale play," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 382-393.
    9. Lin, Chih-Wei & Nazeri, Mahmoud & Bhattacharji, Ayan & Spicer, George & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2016. "Apparatus and method for calibrating a Coriolis mass flow meter for carbon dioxide at pressure and temperature conditions represented to CCS pipeline operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 759-764.
    10. Xi Liang & Hengwei Liu & David Reiner, 2014. "Strategies for Financing Large-scale Carbon Capture and Storage Power Plants in China," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1430, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Adams, T. & Mac Dowell, N., 2016. "Off-design point modelling of a 420MW CCGT power plant integrated with an amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture and compression process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 681-702.
    12. Zhou, Mengmeng & Wang, Shuai & Luo, Kun & Fan, Jianren, 2022. "Three-dimensional modeling study of the oxy-fuel co-firing of coal and biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    13. Lowe, Robert, 2011. "Combined heat and power considered as a virtual steam cycle heat pump," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5528-5534, September.
    14. Gülen, Gürcan & Browning, John & Ikonnikova, Svetlana & Tinker, Scott W., 2013. "Well economics across ten tiers in low and high Btu (British thermal unit) areas, Barnett Shale, Texas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 302-315.
    15. Wang, Jianliang & Mohr, Steve & Feng, Lianyong & Liu, Huihui & Tverberg, Gail E., 2016. "Analysis of resource potential for China’s unconventional gas and forecast for its long-term production growth," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 389-401.
    16. Zou, Youqin & Yang, Changbing & Wu, Daishe & Yan, Chun & Zeng, Masun & Lan, Yingying & Dai, Zhenxue, 2016. "Probabilistic assessment of shale gas production and water demand at Xiuwu Basin in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 185-195.
    17. Zhang, Jianyun & Zhou, Zhe & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2013. "Efficiency of wet feed IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) systems with coal–water slurry preheating vaporization technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 137-145.
    18. Mayr, Bernhard & Prieler, Rene & Demuth, Martin & Hochenauer, Christoph, 2015. "The usability and limits of the steady flamelet approach in oxy-fuel combustions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1478-1489.
    19. Qin, Chao & Jiang, Yongdong & Luo, Yahuang & Zhou, Junping & Liu, Hao & Song, Xiao & Li, Dong & Zhou, Feng & Xie, Yingliang, 2020. "Effect of supercritical CO2 saturation pressures and temperatures on the methane adsorption behaviours of Longmaxi shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    20. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:107:y:2016:i:c:p:580-594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.