IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v104y2016icp1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aerodynamic performance of a circulating airfoil section for Magnus systems via numerical simulation and flow visualization

Author

Listed:
  • Kazemi, Seyed Ali
  • Nili-Ahmadabadi, Mahdi
  • Sedaghat, Ahmad
  • Saghafian, Mohsen

Abstract

The lift to drag ratio is the most determining factor in power efficiency of wind conversion systems such as wind turbines. The lift to drag ratio can be enhanced considerably using circulating airfoil shapes. In this research, the NACA0021 airfoil is modified and manufactured to form a treadmill like circulating shape. Aerodynamic performance of the treadmill shape is computationally and experimentally investigated. In the experiment, the smoke flow visualization is conducted in a small wind tunnel to study flow features such as separation and stagnation points. Computational method is based on the finite volume discretization of RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes) equations and the shear stress transport (k–ω SST (shear-stress transport)) turbulence modeling. Magnus effects are investigated under various speed ratios (speed of circulating surface to the wind speed) and several angles of attack. The numerical and flow visualization results reveal some main changes to flow features including full removal of separation zone above moving surfaces. At the speed ratio of 3, zero angle of attack and flow Reynolds number of 94,000, an impressive lift to drag ratio of 130 is obtained for the circulating airfoil whilst the maximum attainable value is merely 45 for the original NACA0021 airfoil.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazemi, Seyed Ali & Nili-Ahmadabadi, Mahdi & Sedaghat, Ahmad & Saghafian, Mohsen, 2016. "Aerodynamic performance of a circulating airfoil section for Magnus systems via numerical simulation and flow visualization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:104:y:2016:i:c:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216303620
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sedaghat, Ahmad, 2014. "Magnus type wind turbines: Prospectus and challenges in design and modelling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 619-628.
    2. Cherubini, Antonello & Papini, Andrea & Vertechy, Rocco & Fontana, Marco, 2015. "Airborne Wind Energy Systems: A review of the technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1461-1476.
    3. Perković, Luka & Silva, Pedro & Ban, Marko & Kranjčević, Nenad & Duić, Neven, 2013. "Harvesting high altitude wind energy for power production: The concept based on Magnus’ effect," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 151-160.
    4. Ban, Marko & Perković, Luka & Duić, Neven & Penedo, Ricardo, 2013. "Estimating the spatial distribution of high altitude wind energy potential in Southeast Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 24-29.
    5. Archer, Cristina L. & Delle Monache, Luca & Rife, Daran L., 2014. "Airborne wind energy: Optimal locations and variability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 180-186.
    6. Goldstein, Leo, 2013. "Theoretical analysis of an airborne wind energy conversion system with a ground generator and fast motion transfer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 987-995.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Haipeng & Zhang, Bo & Qiu, Qinggang & Xu, Xiang, 2017. "Flow control on the NREL S809 wind turbine airfoil using vortex generators," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1210-1221.
    2. Toni Pujol & Albert Massaguer & Eduard Massaguer & Lino Montoro & Martí Comamala, 2018. "Net Power Coefficient of Vertical and Horizontal Wind Turbines with Crossflow Runners," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Hcini, Cherif & Abidi, Essia & Kamoun, Badreddine & Afungchui, David, 2017. "A Turbosail profile analysis code based on the panel method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 147-155.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali, Qazi Shahzad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2022. "Power conversion performance of airborne wind turbine under unsteady loads," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Lunney, E. & Ban, M. & Duic, N. & Foley, A., 2017. "A state-of-the-art review and feasibility analysis of high altitude wind power in Northern Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 899-911.
    3. Jochem De Schutter & Rachel Leuthold & Thilo Bronnenmeyer & Elena Malz & Sebastien Gros & Moritz Diehl, 2023. "AWEbox : An Optimal Control Framework for Single- and Multi-Aircraft Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, February.
    4. Pavković, D. & Hoić, M. & Deur, J. & Petrić, J., 2014. "Energy storage systems sizing study for a high-altitude wind energy application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 91-103.
    5. Mahdi Ebrahimi Salari & Joseph Coleman & Daniel Toal, 2018. "Power Control of Direct Interconnection Technique for Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. André F. C. Pereira & João M. M. Sousa, 2022. "A Review on Crosswind Airborne Wind Energy Systems: Key Factors for a Design Choice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-40, December.
    7. Malz, E.C. & Hedenus, F. & Göransson, L. & Verendel, V. & Gros, S., 2020. "Drag-mode airborne wind energy vs. wind turbines: An analysis of power production, variability and geography," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Saleem, Arslan & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2019. "Performance of buoyant shell horizontal axis wind turbine under fluctuating yaw angles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 79-91.
    9. Dominković, D.F. & Bačeković, I. & Ćosić, B. & Krajačić, G. & Pukšec, T. & Duić, N. & Markovska, N., 2016. "Zero carbon energy system of South East Europe in 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1517-1528.
    10. De Lellis, M. & Mendonça, A.K. & Saraiva, R. & Trofino, A. & Lezana, Á., 2016. "Electric power generation in wind farms with pumping kites: An economical analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 163-172.
    11. Helena Schmidt & Gerdien de Vries & Reint Jan Renes & Roland Schmehl, 2022. "The Social Acceptance of Airborne Wind Energy: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Govind, Bala, 2017. "Increasing the operational capability of a horizontal axis wind turbine by its integration with a vertical axis wind turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 479-494.
    13. Bechtle, Philip & Schelbergen, Mark & Schmehl, Roland & Zillmann, Udo & Watson, Simon, 2019. "Airborne wind energy resource analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1103-1116.
    14. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    15. Johannes Alexander Müller & Mostafa Yasser Mostafa Khalil Elhashash & Volker Gollnick, 2022. "Electrical Launch Catapult and Landing Decelerator for Fixed-Wing Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Saleem, Arslan & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2020. "Aerodynamic performance optimization of an airfoil-based airborne wind turbine using genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Adhikari, Jeevan & Sapkota, Rajesh & Panda, S.K., 2018. "Impact of altitude and power rating on power-to-weight and power-to-cost ratios of the high altitude wind power generating system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 16-27.
    18. Sedaghat, Ahmad & Samani, Iman & Ahmadi-Baloutaki, Mojtaba & El Haj Assad, M. & Gaith, Mohamed, 2015. "Computational study on novel circulating aerofoils for use in Magnus wind turbine blades," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 393-403.
    19. Ali Arshad Uppal & Manuel C. R. M. Fernandes & Sérgio Vinha & Fernando A. C. C. Fontes, 2021. "Cascade Control of the Ground Station Module of an Airborne Wind Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Trevisi, Filippo & McWilliam, Michael & Gaunaa, Mac, 2021. "Configuration optimization and global sensitivity analysis of Ground-Gen and Fly-Gen Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 385-402.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:104:y:2016:i:c:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.