IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v108y2022ics0140988322000949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-objective competitive-design framework for fuel procurement planning in coal-fired power plants for sustainable operations

Author

Listed:
  • Prasad, Sanjeev K.
  • Mangaraj, B.K.

Abstract

Coal is the backbone of the world's power generation, delivering about 38% of our electricity needs. Its use is expected to remain stable in the short term, with developing countries responsible for most of the increase in coal demand. However, coal-fired power plants contribute significantly to carbon dioxide emissions, with global climate change implications leading the United Nations (UN) to formulate a sustainable development goal (SDG-7) to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all. As this goal is dependent on the quality of fuel used in these plants, this paper considers a multi-objective fuel procurement planning model based on sustainability criteria comprising of economic, social, and environmental aspects. Unlike the conventional multi-objective optimization techniques for handling equally weighed non-substitutable criteria, the paper proposes a control criterion (CC) based interactive max-min approach that reshapes the feasible solution space, bypassing trade-offs to generate competitive solutions (CSs) for the model. The methodology takes into account a compensatory parameter lying in the range of 0 to 1 for possible improvement of the CSs in terms of non-dominance. Thus, the model provides flexibility to the decision-maker (DM) by offering multiple CSs from which the most suitable for the anticipated business scenario may be selected. We demonstrate the model by using a case study in the Indian context considering cash-flow generation from the plant as the CC.

Suggested Citation

  • Prasad, Sanjeev K. & Mangaraj, B.K., 2022. "A multi-objective competitive-design framework for fuel procurement planning in coal-fired power plants for sustainable operations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:108:y:2022:i:c:s0140988322000949
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988322000949
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    2. Dai, C. & Cai, X.H. & Cai, Y.P. & Huang, G.H., 2014. "A simulation-based fuzzy possibilistic programming model for coal blending management with consideration of human health risk under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Tajbakhsh, Alireza & Hassini, Elkafi, 2018. "Evaluating sustainability performance in fossil-fuel power plants using a two-stage data envelopment analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 154-178.
    4. Liu, Chiun-Ming & Sherali, Hanif D., 2000. "A coal shipping and blending problem for an electric utility company," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 433-444, August.
    5. Wang, Ni & Heijnen, Petra W. & Imhof, Pieter J., 2020. "A multi-actor perspective on multi-objective regional energy system planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    6. Mangaraj, B.K. & Aparajita, Upali, 2020. "Constructing a generalized model of the human development index," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Lv, Chengwei & Xu, Jiuping & Xie, Heping & Zeng, Ziqiang & Wu, Yimin, 2016. "Equilibrium strategy based coal blending method for combined carbon and PM10 emissions reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1035-1052.
    8. Anna Danandeh & Bo Zeng & Brent Caldwell & Brian Buckley, 2016. "A Decision Support System for Fuel Supply Chain Design at Tampa Electric Company," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 503-521, December.
    9. Shafiee, Shahriar & Topal, Erkan, 2009. "When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 181-189, January.
    10. Martin, D.M. & Mazzotta, M., 2018. "Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Sensitivity of additive aggregation methods to scaling and compensation assumptions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 13-22.
    11. Cropper, Maureen & Gamkhar, Shama & Malik, Kabir & Limonov, Alex & Partridge, Ian, 2012. "The Health Effects of Coal Electricity Generation in India," RFF Working Paper Series dp-12-25, Resources for the Future.
    12. Chen, C. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H., 2013. "An inexact robust optimization method for supporting carbon dioxide emissions management in regional electric-power systems," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 441-456.
    13. Arigoni, Ashley & Newman, Alexandra & Turner, Cameron & Kaptur, Casey, 2017. "Optimizing global thermal coal shipments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 118-127.
    14. Wei, Yi-Ming & Chen, Hao & Chyong, Chi Kong & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liao, Hua & Tang, Bao-Jun, 2018. "Economic dispatch savings in the coal-fired power sector: An empirical study of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 330-342.
    15. Hocine, Amine, 2018. "Meta goal programing approach for solving multi-criteria de Novo programing problemAuthor-Name: Zhuang, Zheng-Yun," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 228-238.
    16. Prasad, Sanjeev K., 2018. "Business model for transforming a coal mining asset into a rent generating resource: A study under multiple strategic frameworks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 163-170.
    17. Yang, Jian-Bo & Sen, Pratyush, 1996. "Preference modelling by estimating local utility functions for multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 115-138, November.
    18. Hampf, Benjamin & Rødseth, Kenneth Løvold, 2019. "Environmental efficiency measurement with heterogeneous input quality: A nonparametric analysis of U.S. power plants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 610-625.
    19. Liu, Y. & Huang, G.H. & Cai, Y.P. & Cheng, G.H. & Niu, Y.T. & An, K., 2009. "Development of an inexact optimization model for coupled coal and power management in North China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4345-4363, November.
    20. Qian Huang & Qing Feng & Yuan Tian & Li Lu, 2018. "Equilibrium Strategy-Based Optimization Method for Carbon Emission Quota Allocation in Conventional Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    21. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2020. "How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    22. Mekaroonreung, Maethee & Johnson, Andrew L., 2012. "Estimating the shadow prices of SO2 and NOx for U.S. coal power plants: A convex nonparametric least squares approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 723-732.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pablo Benalcazar & Jacek Kamiński & Karol Stós, 2022. "An Integrated Approach to Long-Term Fuel Supply Planning in Combined Heat and Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    2. Martínez, Ricardo & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquín & Llorca, Natividad, 2022. "Assessments in public procurement procedures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Qing Feng & Qian Huang & Qingyan Zheng & Li Lu, 2018. "New Carbon Emissions Allowance Allocation Method Based on Equilibrium Strategy for Carbon Emission Mitigation in the Coal-Fired Power Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    5. Baskoro, Firly Rachmaditya & Takahashi, Katsuhiko & Morikawa, Katsumi & Nagasawa, Keisuke, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization on total cost and carbon dioxide emission of coal supply for coal-fired power plants in Indonesia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese, 2023. "A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 967-994, June.
    7. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Miebs, Grzegorz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2022. "Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 633-651.
    8. Dai, C. & Cai, X.H. & Cai, Y.P. & Huang, G.H., 2014. "A simulation-based fuzzy possibilistic programming model for coal blending management with consideration of human health risk under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Mimica R. Milošević & Dušan M. Milošević & Ana D. Stanojević & Dragan M. Stević & Dušan J. Simjanović, 2021. "Fuzzy and Interval AHP Approaches in Sustainable Management for the Architectural Heritage in Smart Cities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Qian Huang & Qing Feng & Yuan Tian & Li Lu, 2018. "Equilibrium Strategy-Based Optimization Method for Carbon Emission Quota Allocation in Conventional Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Xu, Jiuping & Huang, Qian & Lv, Chengwei & Feng, Qing & Wang, Fengjuan, 2018. "Carbon emissions reductions oriented dynamic equilibrium strategy using biomass-coal co-firing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 184-197.
    12. Panos Xidonas & Ilias Lekkos & Charis Giannakidis & Christos Staikouras, 2023. "Multicriteria security evaluation: does it cost to be traditional?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 323(1), pages 301-330, April.
    13. Yan, Shiyu & Lv, Chengwei & Yao, Liming & Hu, Zhineng & Wang, Fengjuan, 2022. "Hybrid dynamic coal blending method to address multiple environmental objectives under a carbon emissions allocation mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    14. Aye, Goodness & Gupta, Rangan & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Kim, Won Joong, 2015. "Forecasting the price of gold using dynamic model averaging," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 257-266.
    15. Michael Greenstone & Rema Hanna, 2014. "Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3038-3072, October.
    16. Ali Mubarak Al-Qahtani, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review in Microwave Pyrolysis of Biomass, Syngas Production and Utilisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Jen-Yu Lee & Tien-Thinh Nguyen & Hong-Giang Nguyen & Jen-Yao Lee, 2022. "Towards Predictive Crude Oil Purchase: A Case Study in the USA and Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Khannoussi, Arwa & Meyer, Patrick & Chaubet, Aurore, 2023. "A multi-criteria decision aiding approach for upgrading public sewerage systems and its application to the city of Brest," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    19. Steve Newbold & Charles Griffiths & Christopher C. Moore & Ann Wolverton & Elizabeth Kopits, 2010. "The "Social Cost of Carbon" Made Simple," NCEE Working Paper Series 201007, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Aug 2010.
    20. Ritter, Hendrik & Zimmermann, Karl, 2019. "Cap-and-Trade Policy vs. Carbon Taxation: Of Leakage and Linkage," EconStor Preprints 197796, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:108:y:2022:i:c:s0140988322000949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.