IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v46y2016i6p503-521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decision Support System for Fuel Supply Chain Design at Tampa Electric Company

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Danandeh

    (Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620)

  • Bo Zeng

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260)

  • Brent Caldwell

    (Tampa Electric Company, Tampa, Florida 33601)

  • Brian Buckley

    (Tampa Electric Company, Tampa, Florida 33601)

Abstract

Tampa Electric Company (TECO), which serves 687,000 customers in Florida, generates 60 percent of its electricity using coal-fired generators. To meet environmental regulations on the emission of coal combustion, it must carefully mix several fuels of different qualities to make safe, environmentally friendly, and affordable blends that are generator specific. We worked with the management and engineering teams at TECO to develop a decision support platform, which centers around a mixed-integer programming (MIP) model to comprehensively capture system specifications, requirements, and operations in all key aspects of TECO’s fuel supply chain. This platform enables TECO to make optimal procurement, transportation, blending, and burn decisions and satisfy all environmental regulations. We estimate that the implementation of this model can provide TECO with annual fuel-cost savings of 2–3 percent, which translate to millions of dollars of savings in total fuel costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Danandeh & Bo Zeng & Brent Caldwell & Brian Buckley, 2016. "A Decision Support System for Fuel Supply Chain Design at Tampa Electric Company," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 503-521, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:46:y:2016:i:6:p:503-521
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2016.0870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2016.0870
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2016.0870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Chiun-Ming & Sherali, Hanif D., 2000. "A coal shipping and blending problem for an electric utility company," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 433-444, August.
    2. Shih, Jhih-Shyang & Frey, H. Christopher, 1995. "Coal blending optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 452-465, June.
    3. Sarker, Ruhul A. & Gunn, Eldon A., 1997. "A simple SLP algorithm for solving a class of nonlinear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 140-154, August.
    4. Sherali, HD & Puri, R, 1993. "Models for a coal blending and distribution problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 235-243, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prasad, Sanjeev K. & Mangaraj, B.K., 2022. "A multi-objective competitive-design framework for fuel procurement planning in coal-fired power plants for sustainable operations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akgün, İbrahim & Özkil, Altan & Gören, Selçuk, 2020. "A multimodal, multicommodity, and multiperiod planning problem for coal distribution to poor families," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Qifeng Cheng & Shiwei Ning & Xiaohua Xia & Fan Yang, 2016. "Modelling of coal trade process for the logistics enterprise and its optimisation with stochastic predictive control," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2241-2259, April.
    3. Djeumou Fomeni, Franklin, 2018. "A multi-objective optimization approach for the blending problem in the tea industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 179-192.
    4. Liu, Chiun-Ming & Sherali, Hanif D., 2000. "A coal shipping and blending problem for an electric utility company," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 433-444, August.
    5. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    6. DE WOLF, Daniel, 2003. "Using column generation to solve an industrial mixing problem," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2003042, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Cheng, Xianliang & Feng, Suzhen & Zheng, Hao & Wang, Jinwen & Liu, Shuangquan, 2022. "A hierarchical model in short-term hydro scheduling with unit commitment and head-dependency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    8. Ümit Sakallı & Ömer Baykoç & Burak Birgören, 2011. "Stochastic optimization for blending problem in brass casting industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 141-157, June.
    9. Daniel de Wolf & Stéphane Auray & Yves Smeers, 2015. "Using Column Generation To Solve A Coal Blending Problem," Post-Print halshs-02396784, HAL.
    10. Qing Feng & Qian Huang & Qingyan Zheng & Li Lu, 2018. "New Carbon Emissions Allowance Allocation Method Based on Equilibrium Strategy for Carbon Emission Mitigation in the Coal-Fired Power Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Caner TaskIn, Z. & Tamer Ünal, A., 2009. "Tactical level planning in float glass manufacturing with co-production, random yields and substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 252-261, November.
    12. Lv, Chengwei & Xu, Jiuping & Xie, Heping & Zeng, Ziqiang & Wu, Yimin, 2016. "Equilibrium strategy based coal blending method for combined carbon and PM10 emissions reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1035-1052.
    13. Baskoro, Firly Rachmaditya & Takahashi, Katsuhiko & Morikawa, Katsumi & Nagasawa, Keisuke, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization on total cost and carbon dioxide emission of coal supply for coal-fired power plants in Indonesia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Michel Minoux & Riadh Zorgati, 2019. "Sharp upper and lower bounds for maximum likelihood solutions to random Gaussian bilateral inequality systems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 735-766, November.
    15. Michelle L. Blom & Christina N. Burt & Adrian R. Pearce & Peter J. Stuckey, 2014. "A Decomposition-Based Heuristic for Collaborative Scheduling in a Network of Open-Pit Mines," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 658-676, November.
    16. Zhang, Ruijun & Lu, Jie & Zhang, Guangquan, 2011. "A knowledge-based multi-role decision support system for ore blending cost optimization of blast furnaces," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 194-203, November.
    17. Mohammed Alfaki & Dag Haugland, 2013. "Strong formulations for the pooling problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 897-916, July.
    18. Guerras, Lidia S. & Martín, Mariano, 2019. "Optimal gas treatment and coal blending for reduced emissions in power plants: A case study in Northwest Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 739-749.
    19. Mohammed Alfaki & Dag Haugland, 2014. "A cost minimization heuristic for the pooling problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 73-87, November.
    20. Liu, Y. & Huang, G.H. & Cai, Y.P. & Cheng, G.H. & Niu, Y.T. & An, K., 2009. "Development of an inexact optimization model for coupled coal and power management in North China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4345-4363, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:46:y:2016:i:6:p:503-521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.