IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v399y2019icp66-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial heterogeneity promotes antagonistic evolutionary scenarios in microbial community explained by ecological stratification: a simulation study

Author

Listed:
  • Klimenko, Alexandra I.
  • Matushkin, Yury G.
  • Kolchanov, Nikolay A.
  • Lashin, Sergey A.

Abstract

There are two evolutionary trends in genome organization among microbes: towards either amplification or reduction. Which evolutionary scenario overcomes depends on environmental conditions and the complexity of gene networks determining phenotypic traits such as metabolic features of cells. In this simulation study, we have shown that the habitats characterized by nutrient gradients allow spatial subdivision of evolutionary trends depending on the distance to the nutrient source. We have considered interrelations between cell motility, metabolic complexity of dominant populations and ecological features of developing communities and have shown that the distribution of local dominant ecogroups follows clear patterns in chemotaxis-on and -off cases. Chemotaxis was shown to be a factor impeding introduction of new forms and decreasing total biomass of the community. Our simulations have shown that ecological patterns of self-organization of microbial communities cause sustainable different strategies underlying antagonistic evolutionary scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Klimenko, Alexandra I. & Matushkin, Yury G. & Kolchanov, Nikolay A. & Lashin, Sergey A., 2019. "Spatial heterogeneity promotes antagonistic evolutionary scenarios in microbial community explained by ecological stratification: a simulation study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 399(C), pages 66-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:399:y:2019:i:c:p:66-76
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.02.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380019300687
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.02.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lashin, Sergey A. & Matushkin, Yury G. & Suslov, Valentin V. & Kolchanov, Nikolay A., 2012. "Computer modeling of genome complexity variation trends in prokaryotic communities under varying habitat conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 124-129.
    2. Rene Niehus & Sara Mitri & Alexander G. Fletcher & Kevin R. Foster, 2015. "Migration and horizontal gene transfer divide microbial genomes into multiple niches," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: Synthesis from a special issue," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 177-187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jingjing & Dennis, Todd E. & Landers, Todd J. & Bell, Elizabeth & Perry, George L.W., 2017. "Linking individual-based and statistical inferential models in movement ecology: A case study with black petrels (Procellaria parkinsoni)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 425-436.
    2. Meier, Laura & Brauns, Mario & Grimm, Volker & Weitere, Markus & Frank, Karin, 2022. "MASTIFF: A mechanistic model for cross-scale analyses of the functioning of multiple stressed riverine ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    3. Akshit Goyal, 2018. "Metabolic adaptations underlying genome flexibility in prokaryotes," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Suzanne Humphrey & Alfred Fillol-Salom & Nuria Quiles-Puchalt & Rodrigo Ibarra-Chávez & Andreas F. Haag & John Chen & José R. Penadés, 2021. "Bacterial chromosomal mobility via lateral transduction exceeds that of classical mobile genetic elements," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Lu, Yuanming & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Xia, Junfei & Jiang, Jiang, 2022. "Modeling the impact of invasive species litter on conditions affecting its spread and potential regime shift," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    6. Salecker, Jan & Dislich, Claudia & Wiegand, Kerstin & Meyer, Katrin M. & Pe'er, Guy, 2019. "EFForTS-LGraf: A landscape generator for creating smallholder-driven land-use mosaics," EFForTS Discussion Paper Series 29, University of Goettingen, Collaborative Research Centre 990 "EFForTS, Ecological and Socioeconomic Functions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest Transformation Systems (Sumatra, Indonesia)".
    7. Schouten, Rafael & Vesk, Peter A. & Kearney, Michael R., 2020. "Integrating dynamic plant growth models and microclimates for species distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    8. Drechsler, Martin & Wätzold, Frank & Grimm, Volker, 2022. "The hitchhiker's guide to generic ecological-economic modelling of land-use-based biodiversity conservation policies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    9. Pekka Marttinen & William P Hanage, 2017. "Speciation trajectories in recombining bacterial species," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Liukkonen, Lauri & Ayllón, Daniel & Kunnasranta, Mervi & Niemi, Marja & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & Grimm, Volker & Nyman, Anna-Maija, 2018. "Modelling movements of Saimaa ringed seals using an individual-based approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 321-335.
    11. Shiben Zhu & Juken Hong & Teng Wang, 2024. "Horizontal gene transfer is predicted to overcome the diversity limit of competing microbial species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Vit Piskovsky & Nuno M. Oliveira, 2023. "Bacterial motility can govern the dynamics of antibiotic resistance evolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Ceia-Hasse, Ana & Navarro, Laetitia M. & Borda-de-Água, Luís & Pereira, Henrique M., 2018. "Population persistence in landscapes fragmented by roads: Disentangling isolation, mortality, and the effect of dispersal," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 375(C), pages 45-53.
    14. Cameron J. Reid & Max L. Cummins & Stefan Börjesson & Michael S. M. Brouwer & Henrik Hasman & Anette M. Hammerum & Louise Roer & Stefanie Hess & Thomas Berendonk & Kristina Nešporová & Marisa Haenni &, 2022. "A role for ColV plasmids in the evolution of pathogenic Escherichia coli ST58," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Bathmann, Jasper & Peters, Ronny & Naumov, Dmitri & Fischer, Thomas & Berger, Uta & Walther, Marc, 2020. "The MANgrove–GroundwAter feedback model (MANGA) – Describing belowground competition based on first principles," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    16. Juan Manuel Morales & Agustina Virgilio & María Delgado & Otso Ovaskainen, 2017. "A General Approach to Model Movement in (Highly) Fragmented Patch Networks," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 393-412, September.
    17. Ma, Ping & Han, Xiao-Hui & Lin, Yue & Moore, John & Guo, Yao-Xin & Yue, Ming, 2019. "Exploring the relative importance of biotic and abiotic factors that alter the self-thinning rule: Insights from individual-based modelling and machine-learning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 16-24.
    18. Zakharova, L. & Meyer, K.M. & Seifan, M., 2019. "Trait-based modelling in ecology: A review of two decades of research," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:399:y:2019:i:c:p:66-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.