IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v222y2011i3p762-775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring and estimating the flow conditions and fish presence probability under various flow conditions at reach scale using genetic algorithms and kriging methods

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Yu-Pin
  • Wang, Cheng-Long
  • Yu, Hsiao-Hsuan
  • Huang, Chung-Wei
  • Wang, Yung-Chieh
  • Chen, Yu-Wen
  • Wu, Wei-Yao

Abstract

The combination of current velocity and water depth influences stream flow conditions, and fish activities prefer particular flow conditions. This study develops a novel optimal flow classification method for identifying types of stream flow based on the current velocity and the water depth using a genetic algorithm. It is applied to the Datuan stream in northern Taiwan. Fish were sampled and their habitat investigated at the study site during the spring, summer, fall and winter of 2008–2009. The current velocity, water depth and maps of the presence probability of fish were estimated by ordinary and indicator kriging. The optimal classification results were compared with the classification results obtained using the Froude number and empirical methods. The flow classification results demonstrate that the proposed optimal flow classification method that considers depth–velocity and optimally identified criteria for classifying flow types, yields a current velocity and water depth of 0.32 (m/s) and 0.29 (m), respectively, and classifies the flow conditions in the study area as pool, run, riffle and slack. The variography results of the current velocity and the water depth data reveal that seasonal flows are not spatially stationary among seasons in the study area. Kriging methods and a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model (River 2D) with empirical and optimal flow classification methods are more effective than the Froude number method in classifying flow conditions in the study area. The flow condition classifications and probability maps were generated by River 2D, ordinary kriging and indicator kriging, to quantify the flow conditions preferred by Sicyopterus japonicus in the study area. However, the proposed optimal classification method with kriging and River 2D is an effective alternative method for mapping flow conditions and determining the relationship between flow and the presence probability of target fish in support of stream restoration.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Yu-Pin & Wang, Cheng-Long & Yu, Hsiao-Hsuan & Huang, Chung-Wei & Wang, Yung-Chieh & Chen, Yu-Wen & Wu, Wei-Yao, 2011. "Monitoring and estimating the flow conditions and fish presence probability under various flow conditions at reach scale using genetic algorithms and kriging methods," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 762-775.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:3:p:762-775
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.11.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380010006241
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.11.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stockwell, David R.B. & Noble, Ian R., 1992. "Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: A robust and informative method of data analysis," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 385-390.
    2. Peterson, A. Townsend & Papeş, Monica & Soberón, Jorge, 2008. "Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 63-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rong-Song Chen & Chan-Ming Tsai, 2017. "Development of an Evaluation System for Sustaining Reservoir Functions—A Case Study of Shiwen Reservoir in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    2. Ramos, Rodrigo Soares & Kumar, Lalit & Shabani, Farzin & Picanço, Marcelo Coutinho, 2019. "Risk of spread of tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) in tomato crops under various climate change scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 524-535.
    3. Austin, Mike, 2007. "Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-19.
    4. Martín, Gerardo & Yáñez-Arenas, Carlos & Chiappa-Carrara, Xavier, 2022. "Discrepancies between point process models and environmental envelopes identify the niche centroid – geography configuration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    5. Soria-Auza, Rodrigo W. & Kessler, Michael & Bach, Kerstin & Barajas-Barbosa, Paola M. & Lehnert, Marcus & Herzog, Sebastian K. & Böhner, Jürgen, 2010. "Impact of the quality of climate models for modelling species occurrences in countries with poor climatic documentation: a case study from Bolivia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1221-1229.
    6. Yinglian Qi & Xiaoyan Pu & Yaxiong Li & Dingai Li & Mingrui Huang & Xuan Zheng & Jiaxin Guo & Zhi Chen, 2022. "Prediction of Suitable Distribution Area of Plateau pika ( Ochotona curzoniae ) in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A. Townsend Peterson & Karla Rodríguez-Medina & Narayani Barve, 2016. "Mapping current and future potential snakebite risk in the new world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 697-711, February.
    8. Daniela Remolina-Figueroa & David A. Prieto-Torres & Wesley Dáttilo & Ernesto Salgado Díaz & Laura E. Nuñez Rosas & Claudia Rodríguez-Flores & Adolfo G. Navarro-Sigüenza & María del Coro Arizmendi, 2022. "Together forever? Hummingbird-plant relationships in the face of climate warming," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Herkt, K. Matthias B. & Barnikel, Günter & Skidmore, Andrew K. & Fahr, Jakob, 2016. "A high-resolution model of bat diversity and endemism for continental Africa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 9-28.
    10. Huihui Zhang & Xiao Sun & Guoshuai Zhang & Xinke Zhang & Yujing Miao & Min Zhang & Zhan Feng & Rui Zeng & Jin Pei & Linfang Huang, 2022. "Potential Global Distribution of the Habitat of Endangered Gentiana rhodantha Franch : Predictions Based on MaxEnt Ecological Niche Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Goodbody, Tristan R.H. & Coops, Nicholas C. & Srivastava, Vivek & Parsons, Bethany & Kearney, Sean P. & Rickbeil, Gregory J.M. & Stenhouse, Gordon B., 2021. "Mapping recreation and tourism use across grizzly bear recovery areas using social network data and maximum entropy modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    12. Zhenan Jin & Wentao Yu & Haoxiang Zhao & Xiaoqing Xian & Kaiting Jing & Nianwan Yang & Xinmin Lu & Wanxue Liu, 2022. "Potential Global Distribution of Invasive Alien Species, Anthonomus grandis Boheman, under Current and Future Climate Using Optimal MaxEnt Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Sutton, G.F. & Martin, G.D., 2022. "Testing MaxEnt model performance in a novel geographic region using an intentionally introduced insect," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    14. Remm, Kalle & Linder, Madli & Remm, Liina, 2009. "Relative density of finds for assessing similarity-based maps of orchid occurrence," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 294-309.
    15. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A Townsend Peterson & Pierre Mokondoko & Octavio Rojas-Soto & Enrique Martínez-Meyer, 2014. "The Use of Ecological Niche Modeling to Infer Potential Risk Areas of Snakebite in the Mexican State of Veracruz," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.
    16. Marianna V. P. Simões & Hanieh Saeedi & Marlon E. Cobos & Angelika Brandt, 2021. "Environmental matching reveals non-uniform range-shift patterns in benthic marine Crustacea," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 1-20, October.
    17. David Makowski & Murthy Narasimha Mittinty, 2010. "Comparison of Scoring Systems for Invasive Pests Using ROC Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 906-915, June.
    18. Fukuda, Shinji & De Baets, Bernard & Mouton, Ans M. & Waegeman, Willem & Nakajima, Jun & Mukai, Takahiko & Hiramatsu, Kazuaki & Onikura, Norio, 2011. "Effect of model formulation on the optimization of a genetic Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system for fish habitat suitability evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1401-1413.
    19. Minerva Singh & Jessamine Badcock-Scruton & C. Matilda Collins, 2021. "What Will Remain? Predicting the Representation in Protected Areas of Suitable Habitat for Endangered Tropical Avifauna in Borneo under a Combined Climate- and Land-Use Change Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Robinson, Todd P. & van Klinken, Rieks D. & Metternicht, Graciela, 2010. "Comparison of alternative strategies for invasive species distribution modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(19), pages 2261-2269.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:3:p:762-775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.