IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v85y2018icp19-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of outcomes for children and youth in foster and residential group care across agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Portwood, Sharon G.
  • Boyd, Suzanne A.
  • Nelson, Ellissa Brooks
  • Murdock, Tamera B.
  • Hamilton, Jessica
  • Miller, Angela D.

Abstract

Working collaboratively with two state associations and their member (nonprofit) agencies providing out-of-home care to children and youth, University researchers conducted a multi-site project to examine whether there were any differences in individual child-level outcomes between children placed in residential group care and those placed in foster. The study employed a quasi-experimental repeated measures design, with data collected at a minimum of two intervals (at intake and 3-month follow-up) and at subsequent intervals of 6 and 12months for children remaining in care. Samples for analyses were drawn from 1082 youth in either residential group care (n=903) or foster care (n=179), in one of 37 agency sites across two southeastern states, who participated in a broader evaluation project. The average ages of participating youth in residential and foster care were 13.97 (SD=2.43) and 13.65 (SD=2.73), respectively. Based on his or her score on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) at intake, each participant was also assigned to the low functioning group (n=526; 53.1%), the borderline group (n=232; 23.4%), or the high functioning group (n=232; 23.4%). Analyses confirmed that youth in foster care tended to have higher levels of general functioning at baseline than did youth placed in group care. However, the degree to which youth progressed in care on measures of general functioning and mental and behavioral health problems did not differ based on placement setting; youth in residential group care settings progressed at the same rate as youth in community-based settings, regardless of their level of functioning at intake. The only exception to this pattern was in regard to anxiety; there was an observable, but non-significant trend of youth in foster care reporting decreases in anxiety levels, while those in group care reported increased anxiety.

Suggested Citation

  • Portwood, Sharon G. & Boyd, Suzanne A. & Nelson, Ellissa Brooks & Murdock, Tamera B. & Hamilton, Jessica & Miller, Angela D., 2018. "A comparison of outcomes for children and youth in foster and residential group care across agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 19-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:85:y:2018:i:c:p:19-25
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.11.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740917306709
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.11.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James, Sigrid, 2011. "What works in group care? -- A structured review of treatment models for group homes and residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 308-321, February.
    2. Lee, Bethany R. & Thompson, Ron, 2008. "Comparing outcomes for youth in treatment foster care and family-style group care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 746-757, July.
    3. Knorth, Erik J. & Harder, Annemiek T. & Zandberg, Tjalling & Kendrick, Andrew J., 2008. "Under one roof: A review and selective meta-analysis on the outcomes of residential child and youth care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 123-140, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gutterswijk, Raymond V. & Kuiper, Chris H.Z. & Lautan, Navisha & Kunst, Elsemieke G. & van der Horst, Frank C.P. & Stams, Geert Jan J.M. & Prinzie, Peter, 2020. "The outcome of non-residential youth care compared to residential youth care: A multilevel meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Xu, Yanfeng & Man, Xiaoou & Zhang, Lixia & DeForge, Bruce, 2020. "Family foster care and children’s outcomes in China: Evidence from a scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graça, João & Calheiros, Maria Manuela & Patrício, Joana Nunes & Magalhães, Eunice Vieira, 2018. "Emergency residential care settings: A model for service assessment and design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 89-101.
    2. Izzo, Charles V. & Smith, Elliott G. & Sellers, Deborah E. & Holden, Martha J. & Nunno, Michael A., 2020. "Improving relationship quality in group care settings: The impact of implementing the CARE model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Castro, Emma & Magalhães, Eunice & del Valle, Jorge Fernández, 2023. "A systematic review of non-specific and specific treatment factors associated with lower or greater internalising and externalising symptoms in therapeutic residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Hartman, Dana T. & Goodman, Gail S. & Grandchamp, Jaxon & Vidales, Daisy & Shaver, Phillip R. & Lawler, Michael J. & Hobbs, Sue D., 2023. "Outcomes for foster youth placed at a special residential high school: A quantitative case study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Weng, Xue & Chui, Wing Hong & Kim, Tae Yeun, 2018. "Residential education as an alternative for promoting psychosocial and behavioral outcomes among high-risk young Macanese males," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 514-520.
    6. Manso, Juan Manuel Moreno & García-Baamonde, Maria Elena & Alonso, Macarena Blázquez & Barona, Eloísa Guerrero, 2011. "An analysis of how children adapt to residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1981-1988, October.
    7. Tanana, Michael J. & Vanderloo, Mindy J. & Waid, Jeffrey D., 2018. "Harnessing the potential of administrative data to inform child welfare programming with dynamic visualization methodologies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 81-90.
    8. Leipoldt, Jonathan D. & Harder, Annemiek T. & Kayed, Nanna S. & Grietens, Hans & Rimehaug, Tormod, 2022. "The interplay of youth and care characteristics with a positive social climate in therapeutic residential youth care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Leloux-Opmeer, Harmke & Kuiper, Chris H.Z. & Swaab, Hanna T. & Scholte, Evert M., 2018. "Discriminating baseline indicators for (un)favorable psychosocial development in different 24-h settings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 113-123.
    10. Levrouw, Delphine & Devlieghere, Jochen & Vandevelde, Stijn & Roose, Rudi, 2020. "Developing a positive living climate in residential youth care: a qualitative study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Indias, Sílvia & Arruabarrena, Ignacia & De Paúl, Joaquín, 2019. "Child maltreatment, sexual and peer victimization experiences among adolescents in residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 267-273.
    12. Sevilir, R. & van der Helm, G.H.P. & Roest, J.J. & Beld, M.H.M. & Didden, R., 2020. "Differences in perceived living group climate between youth with a Turkish/Moroccan and native Dutch background in residential youth care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Hidalgo, Victoria & Jiménez, Lucía & Grimaldi, Víctor & Ayala-Nunes, Lara & López-Verdugo, Isabel, 2018. "The effectiveness of a child day-care program in child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 145-151.
    14. Kim, Soyoun & Chun, JongSerl, 2016. "Aggressive behaviors among Korean children in out-of-home care: The role of placement characteristics," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 56-61.
    15. Sim, Faye & Li, Dongdong & Chu, Chi Meng, 2016. "The moderating effect between strengths and placement on children's needs in out-of-home care: A follow-up study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 101-108.
    16. Leloux-Opmeer, Harmke & Kuiper, Chris H.Z. & Swaab, Hanna T. & Scholte, Evert M., 2017. "Children referred to foster care, family-style group care, and residential care: (How) do they differ?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-9.
    17. Izzo, Charles V. & Smith, Elliott G. & Sellers, Deborah E. & Holden, Martha J. & Nunno, Michael A., 2022. "Promoting a relational approach to residential child care through an organizational program model: Impacts of CARE implementation on staff outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    18. Ie, Judite & Ursin, Marit & Vicente-Mariño, Miguel, 2022. "Foster children’s views of family: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Harder, Annemiek T. & Mann-Feder, Varda & Oterholm, Inger & Refaeli, Tehila, 2020. "Supporting transitions to adulthood for youth leaving care: Consensus based principles," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    20. Côté, Carole & Clément, Marie-Ève, 2022. "Let’s talk about love: Perceptions of children in residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:85:y:2018:i:c:p:19-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.