IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v62y2016icp83-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of state child welfare administrators regarding federally-mandated citizen review panels

Author

Listed:
  • Collins-Camargo, Crystal
  • Buckwalter, Neal
  • Jones, Blake

Abstract

Since 1996, federal law has required state child welfare agencies receiving grant funding through the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to support the work of independent citizen review panels. According to the law, citizen review panels are to assess the functions and performance of state child welfare systems, providing recommendations for improvements. To date, a handful of studies have examined the work of the citizen review panels from the perspective of the citizen participants, yet the voice of state child welfare administrators regarding their work with the panels has been largely silent in the literature. While exploratory in nature and intent, the present study begins to fill this gap by reporting the results of a national survey of state child welfare administrators regarding their perceptions of barriers and benefits to citizen participation. The qualitative analysis yielded a significant degree of agreement across administrators in 31 states and the District of Columbia, and provided a number of insights for how agencies and citizen review panels can work more collaboratively. These include the need for agencies to assist in the training of CRP participants and for administrators to more deliberately foster an environment conducive to effective engagement by supporting ongoing dialog, integrating CRP recommendations into agency work, and meeting regularly with the groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Buckwalter, Neal & Jones, Blake, 2016. "Perceptions of state child welfare administrators regarding federally-mandated citizen review panels," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 83-89.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:83-89
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.01.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740916300226
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.01.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bryan, Valerie & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Jones, Blake, 2011. "Reflections on citizen-state child welfare partnerships: Listening to citizen review panel volunteers and agency liaisons," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 612-621, May.
    2. Miller, J. Jay & Jones, Blake, 2015. "Using concept mapping as a planning tool: Child welfare citizen review panels," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 99-106.
    3. Jones, Blake L., 2004. "Effectiveness of citizen review panels," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(12), pages 1117-1127, December.
    4. Bryan, Valerie & Jones, Blake & Allen, Erin & Collins-Camargo, Crystal, 2007. "Civic engagement or token participation? Perceived impact of the citizen review panel initiative," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1286-1300, October.
    5. Bryan, Valerie & Jones, Blake & Lawson, Emily, 2010. "Key features of effective citizen-state child welfare partnerships: Findings from a national study of citizen review panels," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 595-603, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nasim Gholami & Mojtaba ANSARI & Mohammadjavad MAHDAVINEJAD, 2018. "A Scientometric Review Of Citizen Participation Research: World Trend," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 37-53, August.
    2. Miller, J. Jay & Vaughn, LaToya Burns, 2018. "Training child welfare citizen review panel members: A promising approach?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 94-97.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miller, J. Jay & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Jones, Blake, 2017. "Exploring the university partnership model for child welfare citizen review panels: A research brief," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-4.
    2. Miller, J. Jay & Vaughn, LaToya Burns, 2018. "Training child welfare citizen review panel members: A promising approach?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 94-97.
    3. Miller, J. Jay & Jones, Blake, 2015. "Using concept mapping as a planning tool: Child welfare citizen review panels," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 99-106.
    4. Bryan, Valerie & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Jones, Blake, 2011. "Reflections on citizen-state child welfare partnerships: Listening to citizen review panel volunteers and agency liaisons," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 612-621, May.
    5. Kobulsky, Julia M. & Cage, Jamie & Celeste, Gabriella, 2018. "The perceived effects of volunteer use by public child welfare agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 27-33.
    6. McBeath, Bowen & Jolles, Mónica Pérez & Chuang, Emmeline & Bunger, Alicia C. & Collins-Camargo, Crystal, 2014. "Organizational responsiveness to children and families: Findings from a national survey of nonprofit child welfare agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 123-132.
    7. Wilson, Samita & Hean, Sarah & Abebe, Tatek & Heaslip, Vanessa, 2020. "Children’s experiences with Child Protection Services: A synthesis of qualitative evidence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Bryan, Valerie & Jones, Blake & Lawson, Emily, 2010. "Key features of effective citizen-state child welfare partnerships: Findings from a national study of citizen review panels," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 595-603, April.
    9. Nasim Gholami & Mojtaba ANSARI & Mohammadjavad MAHDAVINEJAD, 2018. "A Scientometric Review Of Citizen Participation Research: World Trend," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 37-53, August.
    10. Rosas, Scott R. & Smith, Corey & Eenigenburg, Avery & BaileyShea, Chelsea & Jerome, Kathleen & Millane, Maureen, 2022. "A large-scale, geographical approach to using group concept mapping for planning: The Teen Opinions Count (TOC) project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Kaplan, Deanna M. & deBlois, Madeleine & Dominguez, Violeta & Walsh, Michele E., 2016. "Studying the teaching of kindness: A conceptual model for evaluating kindness education programs in schools," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 160-170.
    12. Jay Miller, J. & Benner, Kalea & Kheibari, Athena & Washington, Earl, 2017. "Conceptualizing on-campus support programs for collegiate foster youth and alumni: A plan for action," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 57-67.
    13. Van Holen, Frank & Trogh, Lenny & West, Delphine & Meys, Nina & Vanderfaeillie, Johan, 2019. "Concept mapping the needs of Flemish nonkinship foster parents who care for unaccompanied refugee minors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 84-92.
    14. Miller, J. Jay & Duron, Jacquelynn F. & Donohue-Dioh, Jessica & Geiger, Jennifer M., 2018. "Conceptualizing effective legal representation for Foster youth: A group concept mapping study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 271-278.
    15. Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Borms, Dorien & Teunissen, M.S.L. & Gypen, Laura & Van Holen, Frank, 2023. "Reasons used by Flemish foster care workers in family reunification decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    16. Van Holen, Frank & Geys, Lynn & West, Delphine & Gypen, Laura & Vanderfaeillie, Johan, 2019. "Characteristics of successful foster families according to Flemish foster care workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:83-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.