IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v155y2023ics0190740923004747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protocol for a mixed-methods investigation of quality improvement in early childhood education and care in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Harrison, Linda J.
  • Andrews, Rebecca
  • Hadley, Fay
  • Irvine, Susan
  • Waniganayake, Manjula
  • Barblett, Lennie
  • Davis, Belinda
  • Hatzigianni, Maria
  • Li, Hui

Abstract

International recognition of the early years as a crucial foundational period has led to the design and implementation of quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS) that define, communicate, and monitor the components of quality in early childhood education and care (ECEC). The aim of these policies is to achieve effective quality assurance and improvement through a system-oriented approach to assessment and evaluation. Informed by ecological systems theory, this paper outlines a three-phase, mixed-methods design for researching a national sample of child care centres that showed overall improvement on the Australian National Quality Standard (NQS) assessment and rating (A&R) criteria. The study samples are drawn from a national dataset of centre-based child care services with two or more A&R rounds and an initial rating of Working Towards NQS (N = 1,935). The results of this study will provide insights into the macro-, exo-, meso- and micro-systems level factors and strategies that support quality in ECEC services.

Suggested Citation

  • Harrison, Linda J. & Andrews, Rebecca & Hadley, Fay & Irvine, Susan & Waniganayake, Manjula & Barblett, Lennie & Davis, Belinda & Hatzigianni, Maria & Li, Hui, 2023. "Protocol for a mixed-methods investigation of quality improvement in early childhood education and care in Australia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:155:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923004747
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923004747
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon Cleveland & Michael Krashinsky, 2009. "The nonprofit advantage: Producing quality in thick and thin child care markets," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 440-462.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:6618 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Daphna Bassok & Thomas S. Dee & Scott Latham, 2019. "The Effects of Accountability Incentives in Early Childhood Education," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 838-866, September.
    4. Grindal, Todd & Bowne, Jocelyn Bonnes & Yoshikawa, Hirokazu & Schindler, Holly S. & Duncan, Greg J. & Magnuson, Katherine & Shonkoff, Jack P., 2016. "The added impact of parenting education in early childhood education programs: A meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 238-249.
    5. Pauline Slot, 2018. "Structural characteristics and process quality in early childhood education and care: A literature review," OECD Education Working Papers 176, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ankita Patnaik & Sarah Avellar, "undated". "Improving Children’s Well-Being through Responsible Fatherhood Programs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a62561cdc7ec4e1bb1ff8814f, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Pennerstorfer, Astrid & Pennerstorfer, Dieter, 2019. "How small are small markets? Local market size for child care services," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 340-355.
    3. Juan José Barrios, 2011. "Participation in voluntary organizations," Documentos de Investigación 70, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    4. Juan José Barrios, 2011. "Existence of non-profit organizations in the United States of America," Documentos de Investigación 68, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    5. Herbst, Chris M., 2022. "Child Care in the United States: Markets, Policy, and Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 15547, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Susan Prentice, 2006. "Childcare, co-production and the third sector in Canada," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 521-536, December.
    7. Astrid Pennerstorfer & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2019. "Inequalities in spatial accessibility of childcare: The role of non-profit providers," Economics working papers 2019-15, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    8. Michael Rosholm & Alexander Paul & Dorthe Bleses & Anders Højen & Philip S. Dale & Peter Jensen & Laura M. Justice & Michael Svarer & Simon Calmar Andersen, 2021. "Are Impacts Of Early Interventions In The Scandinavian Welfare State Consistent With A Heckman Curve? A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 106-140, February.
    9. Xiumin Hong & Sijie Zhao & Qianqian Liu, 2022. "Unusual Experience in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Young Children’s Readjustment from Home to Preschool following School Closures in Different Risk Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    10. D’Jamila Garcia & Francisco Simões & Leonor Bettencourt & Cecília Aguiar & Inês Alves Ferreira & Joana Mendonça & Carla Moleiro & Antonella Rocca & Vladislava Lendzhova, 2023. "Predictors of Secondary Education Completion across Portuguese Municipalities: Evidence from the 2009–2018 Period," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Markowitz, Anna J. & Bassok, Daphna & Player, Daniel, 2020. "Simplifying quality rating systems in early childhood education," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. McCoy, Dana Charles & Salhi, Carmel & Yoshikawa, Hirokazu & Black, Maureen & Britto, Pia & Fink, Günther, 2018. "Home- and center-based learning opportunities for preschoolers in low- and middle-income countries," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 44-56.
    13. Gensowski, Miriam & Landersø, Rasmus & Dale, Philip & Hojen, Anders & Justice, Laura & Bleses, Dorthe, 2024. "Public and Parental Investments, and Children's Skill Formation," IZA Discussion Papers 16956, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Hung, Cathy O.Y. & Zhang, Ye & Wen, Ruoyu & Zhang, Dan Dan & Han, Hao & Pan, Ruifeng & Shi, Ping & Yuen, Allan H.K., 2024. "Development and validation of the Chinese Kindergarten Quality Rating Scale (CKQRS): A study based in Guangdong and Jiangsu provinces," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Jing Zhang & Zongye Cai & Huamin Peng & Tom Emery, 2022. "Early Childhood Care Trends and Associations with Child Health Well-being in China: Evidence from the CHNS 1991 to 2011 Data," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 2789-2807, October.
    16. Carolyn J. Cordery & Dalice Sim & Tony Zijl & Gary Monroe, 2017. "Differentiated regulation: the case of charities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 131-164, March.
    17. Giapponi Schneider, Kate & Erickson Warfield, Marji & Joshi, Pamela & Ha, Yoonsook & Hodgkin, Dominic, 2017. "Insights into the black box of child care supply: Predictors of provider participation in the Massachusetts child care subsidy system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 148-159.
    18. Douglas J. Besharov & Douglas M. Call & Jason M. Scott, 2020. "PROTOCOL: Early childhood education programs for improving the development and achievement of low‐income children: a systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), September.
    19. Adam D. Rennhoff & Mark F. Owens, 2012. "Competition and the Strategic Choices of Churches," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 152-170, August.
    20. Muehler, Grit, 2008. "Institutional Childcare: An Overview on the German Market," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-077, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:155:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923004747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.