IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v107y2019ics0190740919303871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile resource referral technology for preventive child welfare services: Implementation and feasibility

Author

Listed:
  • Weiner, Dana
  • Navalkha, Chenab
  • Abramsohn, Emily
  • DePumpo, Megan
  • Paradise, Kelsey
  • Stiehl, Michael
  • Lindau, Stacy Tessler

Abstract

As state and local jurisdictions in the United States prepare to implement the provisions of the 2018 Family First Preventive Services Act (FFPSA), they are faced with the large-scale challenge of making effective linkages between geographically dispersed clients and local preventive services. This pilot study applies a conceptual framework (Proctor et al., 2011) to describe implementation of a scalable, mobile community resource referral tool for use by child and family welfare caseworkers serving intact families with allegations of abuse or neglect. The study also demonstrates how data generated by use of the resource referral technology can be applied to visualize the geographic distribution of resource needs in relation to availability. Caseworkers from one urban agency were trained and given access to the mobile referral tool for a three-month observation period. Implementation data were obtained using mixed methods, including self-administered surveys, semi-structured focus group interviews with caseworkers, and metadata generated by the referral technology. Appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility outcomes were assessed. Findings establish that a mobile referral technology can be implemented with minimal training into caseworker workflows, and identify challenges that can be addressed in future iterations and implementations to reduce redundancy and prevent interruption in referral communication. Additionally, the use of mobile referral technology improved the ability of child welfare professionals to document referrals, and can provide child welfare systems with geographical information about need that will be essential for refining the preventive service continuum. Overall, the functionality of the tool and the data it generates will be important for optimizing resource referrals for preventive case management of child welfare-involved families.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiner, Dana & Navalkha, Chenab & Abramsohn, Emily & DePumpo, Megan & Paradise, Kelsey & Stiehl, Michael & Lindau, Stacy Tessler, 2019. "Mobile resource referral technology for preventive child welfare services: Implementation and feasibility," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:107:y:2019:i:c:s0190740919303871
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919303871
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan, Joseph P. & Schuerman, John R., 2004. "Matching family problems with specific family preservation services: a study of service effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 347-372, April.
    2. Czymoniewicz-Klippel, M.T. & Chesnut, R.P. & DiNallo, J.M. & Perkins, D.F., 2017. "Understanding the implementation of the Grow! parenting program: Findings from a mixed methods pilot study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 99-107.
    3. Lindau, S.T. & Vickery, K.D. & Choi, H. & Makelarski, J. & Matthews, A. & Davis, M., 2016. "A community-powered, asset-based approach to intersect oral urban health system planning in Chicago," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(10), pages 1872-1878.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marsh, Jeanne C. & Ryan, Joseph P. & Choi, Sam & Testa, Mark F., 2006. "Integrated services for families with multiple problems: Obstacles to family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 1074-1087, September.
    2. Kang, Jiyoung, 2012. "Pathways from social support to service use among caregivers at risk of child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 933-939.
    3. Lai, Jianchao & Graef, Michelle & Franke, Todd & Burnham, Toby, 2023. "Contextual determinants of re-reporting for families receiving alternative response: A survival analysis in a Midwestern State," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2019. "Targeting services to reduce need after a child abuse investigation: Examining complex needs, matched services, and meaningful change," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 386-394.
    5. Cash, Scottye J. & Ingram, Stephanie D. & Biben, Denise S. & McKeever, Shann J. & Thompson, Ronald W. & Ferrell, Jared Z., 2012. "Moving forward without looking back: Performance management systems as real-time evidence-based practice tools," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 655-659.
    6. Wu, Chi-Fang & Eamon, Mary Keegan, 2010. "Need for and barriers to accessing public benefits among low-income families with children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 58-66, January.
    7. Czymoniewicz-Klippel, M.T. & Chesnut, R.P. & DiNallo, J.M. & Perkins, D.F., 2018. "Evidence-informed program development: Using a common components approach to develop universal parenting programs for U.S. military and civilian families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 166-177.
    8. Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2016. "Post-investigation service need and utilization among families at risk of maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 223-232.
    9. D'Andrade, Amy C. & Chambers, Ruth M., 2012. "Parental problems, case plan requirements, and service targeting in child welfare reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2131-2138.
    10. Stacy Tessler Lindau & Jennifer A. Makelarski & Emily M. Abramsohn & David G. Beiser & Kelly Boyd & Elbert S. Huang & Kelsey Paradise & Elizabeth L. Tung, 2022. "Sharing information about health‐related resources: Observations from a community resource referral intervention trial in a predominantly African American/Black community," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 438-448, March.
    11. Desautels, Julien & Touchette, Luc & Pauzé, Robert, 2020. "Intensive family intervention programs: Tailoring interventions to family clinical profiles," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    12. Fernandez, Elizabeth & Delfabbro, Paul & Ramia, Ioana & Kovacs, Szilvia, 2019. "Children returning from care: The challenging circumstances of parents in poverty," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 100-111.
    13. Fuller, Tamara & Nieto, Martin, 2014. "Child welfare services and risk of child maltreatment rereports: Do services ameliorate initial risk?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P1), pages 46-54.
    14. Fernandez, Elizabeth, 2007. "Supporting children and responding to their families: Capturing the evidence on family support," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1368-1394, October.
    15. Choi, Sam & Ryan, Joseph P., 2007. "Co-occurring problems for substance abusing mothers in child welfare: Matching services to improve family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1395-1410, November.
    16. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    17. Mersky, Joshua P. & Janczewski, Colleen, 2013. "Adult well-being of foster care alumni: Comparisons to other child welfare recipients and a non-child welfare sample in a high-risk, urban setting," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 367-376.
    18. Wood, S. & Scourfield, J. & Stabler, L. & Addis, S. & Wilkins, D. & Forrester, D. & Brand, S.L., 2022. "How might changes to family income affect the likelihood of children being in out-of-home care? Evidence from a realist and qualitative rapid evidence assessment of interventions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    19. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Lloyd Sieger, Margaret & Choi, Mijin & Harrell, Danielle R. & Findley, Erin & Robinson, Erica D. & Baiden, Philip, 2023. "Family support services and reunification across diverse racial/ethnic groups: A survival analysis utilizing administrative child welfare data," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    20. Ezell, Mark & Spath, Robin & Zeira, Anat & Canali, Cinzia & Fernandez, Elizabeth & Thoburn, June & Vecchiato, Tiziano, 2011. "An international classification system for child welfare programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1847-1854, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:107:y:2019:i:c:s0190740919303871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.