IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v34y2012i5p933-939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways from social support to service use among caregivers at risk of child maltreatment

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Jiyoung

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test pathways from social support to service use among caregivers at risk of child maltreatment, which involved four mediating variables-family functioning, psychosomatic problems, child maltreatment allegation, and perceived needs. I used a subsample of data (n=1000) of Longitudinal Studies of Child Abuse and Neglect (LONGSCAN). The model fitted the data well and supported some of the hypothesized pathways. The effect of social support on service use was mediated by family functioning and psychosomatic symptoms, which in turn was associated with caregivers' perceived needs for outside assistance for a personal or emotional problem. The hypothesized pathways from perceived family functioning and psychosomatic symptoms through CPS report were not supported. The study's findings contribute to understanding the role that social support can play in caregivers' seeking service use for emotional or personal problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Jiyoung, 2012. "Pathways from social support to service use among caregivers at risk of child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 933-939.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:34:y:2012:i:5:p:933-939
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740912000473
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lyons, Sandra J. & Henly, Julia R. & Schuerman, John R., 2005. "Informal support in maltreating families: Its effect on parenting practices," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 21-38, January.
    2. Ryan, Joseph P. & Schuerman, John R., 2004. "Matching family problems with specific family preservation services: a study of service effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 347-372, April.
    3. Libby, A.M. & Orton, H.D. & Barth, R.P. & Webb, M.B. & Burns, B.J. & Wood, P. & Spicer, P., 2006. "Alcohol, drug, and mental health specialty treatment services and race/ethnicity: A national study of children and families involved with child welfare," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(4), pages 628-631.
    4. Choi, Sam & Ryan, Joseph P., 2007. "Co-occurring problems for substance abusing mothers in child welfare: Matching services to improve family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1395-1410, November.
    5. Rajendran, Khushmand & Chemtob, Claude M., 2010. "Factors associated with service use among immigrants in the child welfare system," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 317-323, August.
    6. Keegan Eamon, Mary & Kopels, Sandra, 2004. "`For reasons of poverty': court challenges to child welfare practices and mandated programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(9), pages 821-836, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro L Vázquez & Tommy Chou & Cynthia M Navarro Flores & Tyson S Barrett & Miguel T Villodas & Melanie M Domenech Rodríguez, 2021. "High value correlates of caregiver reported counseling service need and utilization for adolescents at-risk for childhood maltreatment and neglect," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Piper, Kathryn A., 2017. "Differential response in child protection: How much is too much?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 69-80.
    3. Philip Baiden & Wendy Dunnen & Barbara Fallon, 2017. "Examining the Independent Effect of Social Support on Unmet Mental Healthcare Needs Among Canadians: Findings from a Population-Based Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 1229-1246, February.
    4. Álvarez, Míriam & Byrne, Sonia & Rodrigo, María José, 2021. "Social support dimensions predict parental outcomes in a Spanish early intervention program for positive parenting," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Sprague-Jones, Jessica & Singh, Pallavi & Rousseau, Mallory & Counts, Jacqueline & Firman, Casandra, 2020. "The Protective Factors Survey, 2nd Edition: Establishing validity and reliability of a self-report measure of protective factors against child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2019. "Targeting services to reduce need after a child abuse investigation: Examining complex needs, matched services, and meaningful change," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 386-394.
    2. Tonino Esposito & Ashleigh Delaye & Martin Chabot & Nico Trocmé & David Rothwell & Sonia Hélie & Marie-Joelle Robichaud, 2017. "The Effects of Socioeconomic Vulnerability, Psychosocial Services, and Social Service Spending on Family Reunification: A Multilevel Longitudinal Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Wu, Chi-Fang & Eamon, Mary Keegan, 2010. "Need for and barriers to accessing public benefits among low-income families with children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 58-66, January.
    4. Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2016. "Post-investigation service need and utilization among families at risk of maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 223-232.
    5. D'Andrade, Amy C. & Chambers, Ruth M., 2012. "Parental problems, case plan requirements, and service targeting in child welfare reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2131-2138.
    6. Desautels, Julien & Touchette, Luc & Pauzé, Robert, 2020. "Intensive family intervention programs: Tailoring interventions to family clinical profiles," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Fernandez, Elizabeth & Delfabbro, Paul & Ramia, Ioana & Kovacs, Szilvia, 2019. "Children returning from care: The challenging circumstances of parents in poverty," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 100-111.
    8. Shdaimah, Corey S., 2009. ""CPS is not a housing agency"; Housing is a CPS problem: Towards a definition and typology of housing problems in child welfare cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 211-218, February.
    9. Mowbray, Orion & Ryan, Joseph P. & Victor, Bryan G. & Bushman, Gregory & Yochum, Clayton & Perron, Brian E., 2017. "Longitudinal trends in substance use and mental health service needs in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    11. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Lloyd Sieger, Margaret & Choi, Mijin & Harrell, Danielle R. & Findley, Erin & Robinson, Erica D. & Baiden, Philip, 2023. "Family support services and reunification across diverse racial/ethnic groups: A survival analysis utilizing administrative child welfare data," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    12. Cheng, Tyrone C., 2010. "Factors associated with reunification: A longitudinal analysis of long-term foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1311-1316, October.
    13. Ben-David, Vered, 2016. "Substance-abusing parents and their children in termination of parental rights cases in Israel," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 94-100.
    14. Finno-Velasquez, Megan & Seay, Kristen D. & He, Amy S., 2016. "A national probability study of problematic substance use and treatment receipt among Latino caregivers involved with child welfare: The influence of nativity and legal status," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 61-67.
    15. Philbin, Sandy P. & Ayón, Cecilia, 2016. "Luchamos por nuestros hijos: Latino immigrant parents strive to protect their children from the deleterious effects of anti-immigration policies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 128-135.
    16. Marsh, Jeanne C. & Ryan, Joseph P. & Choi, Sam & Testa, Mark F., 2006. "Integrated services for families with multiple problems: Obstacles to family reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 1074-1087, September.
    17. Chartier, Stéphanie & Blavier, Adélaïde, 2021. "Should the reintegration of children in foster care into their biological families be the only goal of the legislation governing foster care? Factors influencing the relations between parents and thei," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Casanueva, Cecilia & Martin, Sandra L. & Runyan, Desmond K. & Barth, Richard P. & Bradley, Robert H., 2008. "Parenting services for mothers involved with child protective services: Do they change maternal parenting and spanking behaviors with young children?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 861-878, August.
    19. Lai, Jianchao & Graef, Michelle & Franke, Todd & Burnham, Toby, 2023. "Contextual determinants of re-reporting for families receiving alternative response: A survival analysis in a Midwestern State," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Dare, Julie & Wilkinson, Celia & Karthigesu, Shantha P. & Coall, David A. & Marquis, Ruth, 2023. "Keeping the family: A socio-ecological perspective on the challenges of child removal and reunification for mothers who have experienced substance-related harms," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:34:y:2012:i:5:p:933-939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.