IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v73y2022i3p438-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharing information about health‐related resources: Observations from a community resource referral intervention trial in a predominantly African American/Black community

Author

Listed:
  • Stacy Tessler Lindau
  • Jennifer A. Makelarski
  • Emily M. Abramsohn
  • David G. Beiser
  • Kelly Boyd
  • Elbert S. Huang
  • Kelsey Paradise
  • Elizabeth L. Tung

Abstract

CommunityRx is a theory‐driven, information technology‐based intervention, developed with and in a predominantly African American/Black community, that provides patients with personalized information (a “HealtheRx”) about self‐management and social care resources in their community. We described patient and clinician information sharing after exposure to the intervention during a clinical trial. Survey data from 145 patients (ages 45–74) and 121 clinicians were analyzed. Of patients who shared information at least once (49%), 47% reported sharing ≥3 times (range 1–14). Patient sharers were in poorer physical health (mean PCS 37.6 vs. 40.8, p = .05) than nonsharers and more likely to report going to a resource on their HealtheRx (79 vs. 41%, p ≤ .05). Most patient sharers provided others a look at or copy of their HealtheRx, keeping the original. Patients used the HealtheRx to promote credibility of the information and communicate that resources were disease‐specific and local. Half of clinicians shared HealtheRx resource information with peers; sharers were 3 times more likely than nonsharers to feel they were well‐informed about resources to address social needs (55 vs. 18%, p

Suggested Citation

  • Stacy Tessler Lindau & Jennifer A. Makelarski & Emily M. Abramsohn & David G. Beiser & Kelly Boyd & Elbert S. Huang & Kelsey Paradise & Elizabeth L. Tung, 2022. "Sharing information about health‐related resources: Observations from a community resource referral intervention trial in a predominantly African American/Black community," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 438-448, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:3:p:438-448
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24560
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lenette M. Jones & Kathy D. Wright & McKenzie K. Wallace & Tiffany Veinot, 2018. "“Take an opportunity whenever you get it†: Information sharing among African†American women with hypertension," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(1), pages 168-171, January.
    2. Sanghee Oh & Sue Yeon Syn, 2015. "Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media: A comparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(10), pages 2045-2060, October.
    3. Benjamin Cornwell & L. Philip Schumm & Edward O. Laumann & Jessica Graber, 2009. "Social Networks in the NSHAP Study: Rationale, Measurement, and Preliminary Findings," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(suppl_1), pages 47-55.
    4. Lindau, S.T. & Vickery, K.D. & Choi, H. & Makelarski, J. & Matthews, A. & Davis, M., 2016. "A community-powered, asset-based approach to intersect oral urban health system planning in Chicago," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(10), pages 1872-1878.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nour El Houda Ben Amor & Mohamed Nabil Mzoughi, 2023. "Do Millennials’ Motives for Using Snapchat Influence the Effectiveness of Snap Ads?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    2. Femke Hilverda & Margôt Kuttschreuter, 2018. "Online Information Sharing About Risks: The Case of Organic Food," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(9), pages 1904-1920, September.
    3. Jang-Won Moon & Yuting An, 2022. "Scale Construction and Validation of Uses and Gratifications Motivations for Smartphone Use by Tourists: A Multilevel Approach," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Diana Tsoy & Danijela Godinic & Qingyan Tong & Bojan Obrenovic & Akmal Khudaykulov & Konstantin Kurpayanidi, 2022. "Impact of Social Media, Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) on the Intention to Stay at Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Hamby, Anne & Kim, Hongmin & Spezzano, Francesca, 2024. "Sensational stories: The role of narrative characteristics in distinguishing real and fake news and predicting their spread," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Howard Litwin & Michal Levinsky, 2022. "Does personality shape the personal social networks of older Europeans?," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 717-727, September.
    7. Lucie Kalousova, 2014. "Social isolation as a risk factor for inadequate diet of older Eastern Europeans," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(5), pages 707-714, October.
    8. Perkins, Jessica M. & Subramanian, S.V. & Christakis, Nicholas A., 2015. "Social networks and health: A systematic review of sociocentric network studies in low- and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 60-78.
    9. Joo, Won-tak, 2023. "Educational gradient in social network changes at disease diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    10. Ferraro, Kenneth F. & Kim, Seoyoun, 2014. "Health benefits of religion among Black and White older adults? Race, religiosity, and C-reactive protein," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 92-99.
    11. Linda Waite & Aniruddha Das, 2010. "Families, social life, and well-being at older ages," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(1), pages 87-109, March.
    12. Francisca Ortiz & Elisa Bellotti, 2021. "The Impact of Life Trajectories on Retirement: Socioeconomic Differences in Social Support Networks," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 327-338.
    13. Zhu, Chunxiao & Shou, Minghuan & Zhou, Yitong & Li, Wenrui, 2023. "Modeling the effect of social media on older adults’ usage intention of public transport," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 239-250.
    14. Shah, Zakir & Chu, Jianxun & Feng, Bo & Qaisar, Sara & Ghani, Usman & Hassan, Zameer, 2019. "If you care, I care: Perceived social support and public engagement via SNSs during crises," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Sohn, Sung Yun & Joo, Won-tak & Kim, Woo Jung & Kim, Se Joo & Youm, Yoosik & Kim, Hyeon Chang & Park, Yeong-Ran & Lee, Eun, 2017. "Social network types among older Korean adults: Associations with subjective health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 88-95.
    16. Jiabei Xia & Tailai Wu & Liqin Zhou, 2021. "Sharing of Verified Information about COVID-19 on Social Network Sites: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    17. Xi Wang & Zhiya Zuo & Xing Tong & Yushan Zhu, 2024. "Talk more about yourself: a data-driven extended theory of reasoned action for online health communities," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 233-246, September.
    18. Zhang, Shimin & Wang, Qiong & Wang, Xiyuan & Qi, Kaili & Zhou, Yanxin & Zhou, Chengchao, 2022. "Pet ownership and cognitive frailty among Chinese rural older adults who experienced a social loss: Is there a sex difference?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    19. Saijun Zhang & Meirong Liu & Yeefay Li & Jae Eun Chung, 2021. "Teens’ Social Media Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Time Series Examination of Posting and Emotion on Reddit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Rebecca F Carlin & Benjamin Cornwell & Jichuan Wang & Yao Cheng & Anita Mathews & Rosalind P Oden & Linda Y Fu & Rachel Y Moon, 2021. "Can respondent driven sampling be used to recruit new mothers? A mixed methods study in metropolitan Washington DC," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:3:p:438-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.