IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v67y2013icp15-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moment adjusted imputation for multivariate measurement error data with applications to logistic regression

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas, Laine
  • Stefanski, Leonard A.
  • Davidian, Marie

Abstract

In clinical studies, covariates are often measured with error due to biological fluctuations, device error and other sources. Summary statistics and regression models that are based on mis-measured data will differ from the corresponding analysis based on the “true” covariate. Statistical analysis can be adjusted for measurement error, however various methods exhibit a tradeoff between convenience and performance. Moment Adjusted Imputation (MAI) is a measurement error in a scalar latent variable that is easy to implement and performs well in a variety of settings. In practice, multiple covariates may be similarly influenced by biological fluctuations, inducing correlated, multivariate measurement error. The extension of MAI to the setting of multivariate latent variables involves unique challenges. Alternative strategies are described, including a computationally feasible option that is shown to perform well.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas, Laine & Stefanski, Leonard A. & Davidian, Marie, 2013. "Moment adjusted imputation for multivariate measurement error data with applications to logistic regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 15-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:67:y:2013:i:c:p:15-24
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.04.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947313001588
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2013.04.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurence S. Freedman & Vitaly Fainberg & Victor Kipnis & Douglas Midthune & Raymond J. Carroll, 2004. "A New Method for Dealing with Measurement Error in Explanatory Variables of Regression Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 172-181, March.
    2. Raymond J. Carroll & Peter Hall, 2004. "Low order approximations in deconvolution and regression with errors in variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 31-46, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cornelis J. Potgieter & Rubin Wei & Victor Kipnis & Laurence S. Freedman & Raymond J. Carroll, 2016. "Moment reconstruction and moment‐adjusted imputation when exposure is generated by a complex, nonlinear random effects modeling process," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1369-1377, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Di Marzio & Stefania Fensore & Charles C. Taylor, 2023. "Kernel regression for errors-in-variables problems in the circular domain," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(4), pages 1217-1237, October.
    2. Delaigle, Aurore & Fan, Jianqing & Carroll, Raymond J., 2009. "A Design-Adaptive Local Polynomial Estimator for the Errors-in-Variables Problem," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(485), pages 348-359.
    3. Carrasco, Marine & Florens, Jean-Pierre, 2011. "A Spectral Method For Deconvolving A Density," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 546-581, June.
    4. Wu, Ximing & Perloff, Jeffrey M., 2007. "Information-Theoretic Deconvolution Approximation of Treatment Effect Distribution," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt9vd036zx, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    5. Yuan-chin Chang, 2011. "Sequential estimation in generalized linear models when covariates are subject to errors," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 93-120, January.
    6. Staudenmayer, John & Ruppert, David & Buonaccorsi, John P., 2008. "Density Estimation in the Presence of Heteroscedastic Measurement Error," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 726-736, June.
    7. Delaigle, Aurore & Meister, Alexander, 2007. "Nonparametric Regression Estimation in the Heteroscedastic Errors-in-Variables Problem," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 1416-1426, December.
    8. Wu, Ximing & Perloff, Jeffrey M., 2007. "Information-Theoretic Deconvolution Approximation of Treatment Effect Distribution," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt9vd036zx, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    9. Matthew Backus & Gregory Lewis, 2016. "Dynamic Demand Estimation in Auction Markets," NBER Working Papers 22375, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Laine Thomas & Leonard Stefanski & Marie Davidian, 2011. "A Moment-Adjusted Imputation Method for Measurement Error Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1461-1470, December.
    11. Abhra Sarkar & Bani K. Mallick & Raymond J. Carroll, 2014. "Bayesian semiparametric regression in the presence of conditionally heteroscedastic measurement and regression errors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 823-834, December.
    12. Julie McIntyre & Brent A. Johnson & Stephen M. Rappaport, 2018. "Monte Carlo methods for nonparametric regression with heteroscedastic measurement error," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 498-505, June.
    13. William Horrace & Christopher Parmeter, 2011. "Semiparametric deconvolution with unknown error variance," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 129-141, April.
    14. Carolyn Anderson & Hsiu-Ting Yu, 2007. "Log-Multiplicative Association Models as Item Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 5-23, March.
    15. Martin L. Hazelton & Berwin A. Turlach, 2010. "Semiparametric Density Deconvolution," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(1), pages 91-108, March.
    16. Marco Di Marzio & Stefania Fensore & Agnese Panzera & Charles C. Taylor, 2022. "Density estimation for circular data observed with errors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 248-260, March.
    17. Eric Weese & Masayoshi Hayashi & Masashi Nishikawa, 2015. "Inefficiency and Self-Determination: Simulation-based Evidence from Meiji Japan," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-989, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    18. Sandip Barui & Grace Y. Yi, 2020. "Semiparametric methods for survival data with measurement error under additive hazards cure rate models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 421-450, July.
    19. Mengli Zhang & Yang Bai, 2021. "On the use of repeated measurement errors in linear regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(5), pages 779-803, July.
    20. Aiyi Liu & Enrique F. Schisterman & Chengqing Wu, 2006. "Multistage Evaluation of Measurement Error in a Reliability Study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 1190-1196, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:67:y:2013:i:c:p:15-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.