IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v55y2011i3p1498-1508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian analysis of the patterns of biological susceptibility via reversible jump MCMC sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Rui-Yin
  • Tao, Jian
  • Shi, Ning-Zhong
  • He, Xuming

Abstract

In some biological experiments, it is quite common that laboratory subjects differ in their patterns of susceptibility to a treatment. Finite mixture models are useful in those situations. In this paper we model the number of components and the component parameters jointly, and base inference about these quantities on their posterior probabilities, making use of the reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. In particular, we apply the methodology to the analysis of univariate normal mixtures with multidimensional parameters, using a hierarchical prior model that allows weak priors while avoiding improper priors in the mixture context. The practical significance of the proposed method is illustrated with a dose-response data set.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Rui-Yin & Tao, Jian & Shi, Ning-Zhong & He, Xuming, 2011. "Bayesian analysis of the patterns of biological susceptibility via reversible jump MCMC sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1498-1508, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:3:p:1498-1508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00404-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenny S. Crump, 1995. "Calculation of Benchmark Doses from Continuous Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 79-89, February.
    2. Tao, Jian & Shi, Ning-Zhong & Lee, S.-Y.Sik-Yum, 2004. "Drug risk assessment with determining the number of sub-populations under finite mixture normal models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 661-676, July.
    3. Sylvia. Richardson & Peter J. Green, 1997. "On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures with an Unknown Number of Components (with discussion)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(4), pages 731-792.
    4. Mehdi Razzaghi & Ralph L. Kodell, 2000. "Risk Assessment for Quantitative Responses Using a Mixture Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 519-527, June.
    5. Ralph L. Kodell & Ronnie W. West, 1993. "Upper Confidence Limits on Excess Risk for Quantitative Responses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 177-182, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pandolfi, Silvia & Bartolucci, Francesco & Friel, Nial, 2014. "A generalized multiple-try version of the Reversible Jump algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 298-314.
    2. Drovandi, Christopher C. & Pettitt, Anthony N. & Henderson, Robert D. & McCombe, Pamela A., 2014. "Marginal reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo with application to motor unit number estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 128-146.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Razzaghi & Ralph Kodell, 2004. "Quantitative Risk Assessment for Developmental Neurotoxic Effects," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1673-1681, December.
    2. Tao, Jian & Shi, Ning-Zhong & Lee, S.-Y.Sik-Yum, 2004. "Drug risk assessment with determining the number of sub-populations under finite mixture normal models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 661-676, July.
    3. Mirjam Moerbeek & Aldert H. Piersma & Wout Slob, 2004. "A Comparison of Three Methods for Calculating Confidence Intervals for the Benchmark Dose," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 31-40, February.
    4. Mehdi Razzaghi & Ralph L. Kodell, 2000. "Risk Assessment for Quantitative Responses Using a Mixture Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 519-527, June.
    5. Yasushi Suwazono & Kouichi Sakata & Mitsuhiro Oishi & Yasushi Okubo & Mirei Dochi & Etsuko Kobayashi & Teruhiko Kido & Koji Nogawa, 2007. "Estimation of Benchmark Dose as the Threshold Amount of Alcohol Consumption for Blood Pressure in Japanese Workers," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 1487-1495, December.
    6. Walter W. Piegorsch, 2010. "Translational benchmark risk analysis," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 653-667, July.
    7. Signe M. Jensen & Felix M. Kluxen & Christian Ritz, 2019. "A Review of Recent Advances in Benchmark Dose Methodology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(10), pages 2295-2315, October.
    8. Esben Budtz-Jørgensen & Niels Keiding & Philippe Grandjean, 2001. "Benchmark Dose Calculation from Epidemiological Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 698-706, September.
    9. Meredith M. Regan & Paul J. Catalano, 1999. "Likelihood Models for Clustered Binary and Continuous Out comes: Application to Developmental Toxicology," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 760-768, September.
    10. Kan Shao & Jeffrey S. Gift, 2014. "Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 101-120, January.
    11. Salomon J. Sand & Dietrich Von Rosen & Agneta Falk Filipsson, 2003. "Benchmark Calculations in Risk Assessment Using Continuous Dose‐Response Information: The Influence of Variance and the Determination of a Cut‐Off Value," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5), pages 1059-1068, October.
    12. Shuang Zhang & Xingdong Feng, 2022. "Distributed identification of heterogeneous treatment effects," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 57-89, March.
    13. N. T. Longford & Pierpaolo D'Urso, 2011. "Mixture models with an improper component," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(11), pages 2511-2521, January.
    14. Conti, Gabriella & Frühwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia & Heckman, James J. & Piatek, Rémi, 2014. "Bayesian exploratory factor analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 31-57.
    15. Zhengyi Zhou & David S. Matteson & Dawn B. Woodard & Shane G. Henderson & Athanasios C. Micheas, 2015. "A Spatio-Temporal Point Process Model for Ambulance Demand," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 6-15, March.
    16. Francisco Richter & Bart Haegeman & Rampal S. Etienne & Ernst C. Wit, 2020. "Introducing a general class of species diversification models for phylogenetic trees," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 261-274, August.
    17. Nalini Ravishanker & Dipak K. Dey, 2000. "Multivariate Survival Models with a Mixture of Positive Stable Frailties," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 293-308, September.
    18. Yasutomo Murasawa, 2020. "Measuring public inflation perceptions and expectations in the UK," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 315-344, July.
    19. Minjung Kyung & Ju-Hyun Park & Ji Yeh Choi, 2022. "Bayesian Mixture Model of Extended Redundancy Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 946-966, September.
    20. Luigi Spezia, 2019. "Modelling covariance matrices by the trigonometric separation strategy with application to hidden Markov models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 399-422, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:3:p:1498-1508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.