IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v137y2020ics0960077920301818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individuals with the firm heart are conducive to cooperation in social dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Mengyao
  • Pan, Qiuhui
  • He, Mingfeng

Abstract

The attitude, silent or speaking, and the behavior, cooperation or betrayal, are two interrelated and mutually influential attributes of individuals. In the context of environmental dilemma, four strategies are determined depending on two factors mentioned. In this paper, a new analytic framework is built to take care of those four types of groups - silent cooperator, speaking cooperator, silent defector and speaking defector, and we catch sight of that the system has five situations in equilibrium: (i) only silent defectors left; (ii) two types of defector are living together; (iii) all four types of individual exist; (iv) two types of cooperator remained; (v) all are silent cooperators. We introduced an additional benefit to measure the approval for the silent partner from the public. Enough benefits can encourage cooperation, but it beyond a certain level there is no further function. Besides, when the possibility of being influenced is smaller than that of spontaneous actions, it means that the vast majority of individuals in society have the firm heart, the public recognition of silent cooperators may ensure cooperation. Conversely, the same conclusion cannot be reached. Individuals are influenced more easily, as the lash of the information times, cooperation may survive the dilemma by meeting two conditions that the approval for silent cooperators and the relative firmness of the most in our society. Therefore, individuals with the firm heart are conducive to the emergence and maintenance of cooperation in environmental dilemmas under the guidance of correct values.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Mengyao & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2020. "Individuals with the firm heart are conducive to cooperation in social dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s0960077920301818
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077920301818
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuelong Li & Marko Jusup & Zhen Wang & Huijia Li & Lei Shi & Boris Podobnik & H. Eugene Stanley & Shlomo Havlin & Stefano Boccaletti, 2018. "Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(1), pages 30-35, January.
    2. Benjamin Allen & Gabor Lippner & Yu-Ting Chen & Babak Fotouhi & Naghmeh Momeni & Shing-Tung Yau & Martin A. Nowak, 2017. "Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure," Nature, Nature, vol. 544(7649), pages 227-230, April.
    3. Kumacheva, Suriya Sh. & Gubar, Elena A. & Zhitkova, Ekaterina M. & Kurnosykh, Zlata & Skovorodina, Tatiana, 2017. "Modelling of Information Spreading in the Population of Taxpayers: Evolutionary Approach," Conference Papers 10455, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    4. Alam, Muntasir & Kuga, Kazuki & Tanimoto, Jun, 2019. "Three-strategy and four-strategy model of vaccination game introducing an intermediate protecting measure," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 408-422.
    5. Fukutomi, Masao & Kurokawa, Shun, 2018. "How much cost should reciprocators pay in order to distinguish the opponent's cooperation from the opponent's defection?," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 301-314.
    6. Pan, Qiuhui & Shi, Shu & Zhang, Yu & He, Mingfeng, 2013. "Cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with delayed decisions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 166-174.
    7. Martin A. Nowak & Akira Sasaki & Christine Taylor & Drew Fudenberg, 2004. "Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 646-650, April.
    8. I. Hashem & D. Telen & P. Nimmegeers & J. Van Impe, 2018. "The Silent Cooperator: An Epigenetic Model for Emergence of Altruistic Traits in Biological Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-16, September.
    9. Nöldeke, Georg & Peña, Jorge, 2018. "Group size effects in social evolution," IAST Working Papers 18-75, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    10. Bruce Edmonds, 2012. "Modeling Belief Change In A Population Using Explanatory Coherence," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-15.
    11. McAvoy, Alex & Fraiman, Nicolas & Hauert, Christoph & Wakeley, John & Nowak, Martin A., 2018. "Public goods games in populations with fluctuating size," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 72-84.
    12. Kabir, K.M. Ariful & Tanimoto, Jun, 2019. "Dynamical behaviors for vaccination can suppress infectious disease – A game theoretical approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 229-239.
    13. Andrés Chacoma & Damián H Zanette, 2015. "Opinion Formation by Social Influence: From Experiments to Modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.
    15. Zhen Wang & Marko Jusup & Lei Shi & Joung-Hun Lee & Yoh Iwasa & Stefano Boccaletti, 2018. "Exploiting a cognitive bias promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    16. Rand, David Gertler & Dreber, Anna & Fudenberg, Drew & Ellingson, Tore & Nowak, Martin A., 2009. "Positive Interactions Promote Public Cooperation," Scholarly Articles 3804483, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    17. Christian Hilbe & Štěpán Šimsa & Krishnendu Chatterjee & Martin A. Nowak, 2018. "Evolution of cooperation in stochastic games," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7713), pages 246-249, July.
    18. Wang, Qiang & He, Nanrong & Chen, Xiaojie, 2018. "Replicator dynamics for public goods game with resource allocation in large populations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 162-170.
    19. Hu, Yuhan & Pan, Qiuhui & Hou, Wenbing & He, Mingfeng, 2018. "Rumor spreading model with the different attitudes towards rumors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 331-344.
    20. Chen, Ya-Shan & Yang, Han-Xin & Guo, Wen-Zhong & Liu, Geng-Geng, 2018. "Promotion of cooperation based on swarm intelligence in spatial public goods games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 614-620.
    21. Liu, Yongkui & Zhang, Lin & Chen, Xiaojie & Ren, Lei & Wang, Long, 2013. "Cautious strategy update promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(17), pages 3640-3647.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Chaoqian & Huang, Chaochao & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "Modeling the social dilemma of involution on a square lattice," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Bin-Quan & Wu, Zhi-Xi & Guan, Jian-Yue, 2022. "Critical thresholds of benefit distribution in an extended snowdrift game model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Quan, Ji & Chen, Xinyue & Wang, Xianjia, 2024. "Repeated prisoner's dilemma games in multi-player structured populations with crosstalk," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    3. You, Tao & Wang, Peng & Jia, Danyang & Yang, Fei & Cui, Xiaodong & Liu, Chen, 2020. "The effects of heterogeneity of updating rules on cooperation in spatial network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    4. Gao, Liyan & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2020. "Changeable updating rule promotes cooperation in well-mixed and structured populations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    5. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Yang, Luhe & Zhang, Lianzhong, 2021. "Environmental feedback in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    7. Cheng, Fei & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao, 2020. "Rewards based on public loyalty program promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    8. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.
    9. Iwamura, Yoshiro & Nagashima, Keisuke & Tanimoto, Jun, 2020. "Evolutionary dynamics of a 3-strategy game: Cooperator, defector and costly cooperative loner strategic types," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    10. Sarkar, Bijan, 2021. "The cooperation–defection evolution on social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    11. Ohdaira, Tetsushi, 2024. "The universal probabilistic reward based on the difference of payoff realizes the evolution of cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Guan, Junbiao & Wang, Kaihua, 2020. "Cooperative evolution in pedestrian room evacuation considering different individual behaviors," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    13. Wu, Yu’e & Zhang, Zhipeng & Chang, Shuhua, 2019. "Reciprocal reward promotes the evolution of cooperation in structured populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 230-236.
    14. Liu, Yifan & Geng, Yini & Du, Chunpeng & Hu, Kaipeng & Shen, Chen & Pansini, Riccardo & Shi, Lei, 2021. "The interface of unidirectional rewards: Enhanced cooperation within interdependent networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 402(C).
    15. Li, Xiaopeng & Hao, Gang & Zhang, Zhipeng & Xia, Chengyi, 2021. "Evolution of cooperation in heterogeneously stochastic interactions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    16. He, Nanrong & Chen, Xiaojie & Szolnoki, Attila, 2019. "Central governance based on monitoring and reporting solves the collective-risk social dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 347(C), pages 334-341.
    17. Ma, Xiaojian & Quan, Ji & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Evolution of cooperation with nonlinear environment feedback in repeated public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 452(C).
    18. Quan, Ji & Yu, Junyu & Li, Xia & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Conditional switching between social excluders and loners promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Hu, Liwen & He, Nanrong & Weng, Qifeng & Chen, Xiaojie & Perc, Matjaž, 2020. "Rewarding endowments lead to a win-win in the evolution of public cooperation and the accumulation of common resources," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Liu, Run-Ran & Jia, Chun-Xiao & Rong, Zhihai, 2019. "Effects of enhancement level on evolutionary public goods game with payoff aspirations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 242-248.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s0960077920301818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.