IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v114y2018icp38-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reward depending on public funds stimulates cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ya
  • Chen, Shanxiong
  • Niu, Ben

Abstract

Prisoner’s dilemma (shortly, PD) games are studied on a square lattice, in which reward mechanisms are considered to stimulate cooperation. It is known to all that results vary with different reward methods. The tax mechanism, an effective tool to adjust the economy, inspires a reward approach where each player should pay corresponding taxes according to their payoff ranks to gather public funds, which is utilized to reward cooperators. There are three main reward levels: high intensity, middle intensity and low intensity. When total public funds keep relatively stable, the reward coverage is determined by the reward intensity. In other words, high intensity of reward is accompanied with narrow range and low intensity accompanies with wide range. Through the proposed model, whether the new reward mechanism can stimulate cooperation and what reward level is the optimum choice could be studied. Simulations reveal that this new mechanism is of great benefit to cooperation and it is noteworthy that low reward intensity with wide coverage has the biggest impact on cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ya & Chen, Shanxiong & Niu, Ben, 2018. "Reward depending on public funds stimulates cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 38-45.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:114:y:2018:i:c:p:38-45
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077918305344
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuelong Li & Marko Jusup & Zhen Wang & Huijia Li & Lei Shi & Boris Podobnik & H. Eugene Stanley & Shlomo Havlin & Stefano Boccaletti, 2018. "Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(1), pages 30-35, January.
    2. Benjamin Allen & Gabor Lippner & Yu-Ting Chen & Babak Fotouhi & Naghmeh Momeni & Shing-Tung Yau & Martin A. Nowak, 2017. "Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure," Nature, Nature, vol. 544(7649), pages 227-230, April.
    3. Falk, Armin & Fischbacher, Urs, 2006. "A theory of reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 293-315, February.
    4. Li, Ya & Lan, Xin & Deng, Xinyang & Sadiq, Rehan & Deng, Yong, 2014. "Comprehensive consideration of strategy updating promotes cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 403(C), pages 284-292.
    5. Erez Lieberman & Christoph Hauert & Martin A. Nowak, 2005. "Evolutionary dynamics on graphs," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7023), pages 312-316, January.
    6. Hisashi Ohtsuki & Christoph Hauert & Erez Lieberman & Martin A. Nowak, 2006. "A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 502-505, May.
    7. Wang, Chengjiang & Wang, Li & Wang, Juan & Sun, Shiwen & Xia, Chengyi, 2017. "Inferring the reputation enhances the cooperation in the public goods game on interdependent lattices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 18-29.
    8. Rick L. Riolo & Michael D. Cohen & Robert Axelrod, 2001. "Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6862), pages 441-443, November.
    9. Gary E Bolton & Axel Ockenfels, 1997. "A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition," Levine's Working Paper Archive 1889, David K. Levine.
    10. Li, Dandan & Ma, Jing & Tian, Zihao & Zhu, Hengmin, 2015. "An evolutionary game for the diffusion of rumor in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 433(C), pages 51-58.
    11. Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen & Hu, Kaipeng & Shi, Lei, 2018. "Impact of punishment on the evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 540-545.
    12. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    13. Xiuling Wang & Jie Wu & Gang Shu & Ya Li, 2014. "Punishment Based on Public Benefit Fund Significantly Promotes Cooperation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-8, August.
    14. Jeff Gore & Hyun Youk & Alexander van Oudenaarden, 2009. "Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 459(7244), pages 253-256, May.
    15. Benjamin Grant Purzycki & Coren Apicella & Quentin D. Atkinson & Emma Cohen & Rita Anne McNamara & Aiyana K. Willard & Dimitris Xygalatas & Ara Norenzayan & Joseph Henrich, 2016. "Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality," Nature, Nature, vol. 530(7590), pages 327-330, February.
    16. Zhenhua Pei & Baokui Wang & Jinming Du, 2016. "Effects of income redistribution on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Papers 1611.01531, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao, Weijuan & Hu, Yuhan, 2024. "The implications of deep cooperation strategy for the evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    2. Zhang, Lulu & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "The influence of donation behavior on the evolution of cooperation in social dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Lu, Shounan & Dai, Jianhua & Zhu, Ge & Guo, Li, 2023. "Investigating the effectiveness of interaction-efficiency-driven strategy updating under progressive-interaction for the evolution of the prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Wang, Jianwei & Xu, Wenshu & Zhang, Xingjian & Zhao, Nianxuan & Yu, Fengyuan, 2023. "Redistribution based on willingness to cooperate promotes cooperation while intensifying equality in heterogeneous populations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    5. Zhenghong Wu & Huan Huang & Qinghu Liao, 2021. "The study on the role of dedicators on promoting cooperation in public goods game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Zhang, Xiaoyang & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao & Li, Xueya, 2020. "Increasing pool funds in public goods: The effects of deposit-based delayed rewards," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Wang, Jianwei & Xu, Wenshu & Chen, Wei & Yu, Fengyuan & He, Jialu, 2021. "Inter-group selection of strategy promotes cooperation in public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    8. Alfaro, Gaspar & Sanjuan, Miguel A.F., 2022. "Time-dependent effects hinder cooperation on the public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Pu, Jia & Jia, Tao & Li, Ya, 2019. "Effects of time cost on the evolution of cooperation in snowdrift game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 146-151.
    10. Fu, Xiao & Liu, Xuesong & Hu, Yuhan & Huang, Shaoxu, 2023. "Emotion-based renewal strategies to promote cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    11. Bi, Yan & Yang, Hui, 2023. "Based on reputation consistent strategy times promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 444(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yifan & Shu, Gang & Li, Ya, 2017. "Strategy-updating depending on local environment enhances cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 224-232.
    2. Fabio Della Rossa & Fabio Dercole & Anna Di Meglio, 2020. "Direct Reciprocity and Model-Predictive Strategy Update Explain the Network Reciprocity Observed in Socioeconomic Networks," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Sarkar, Bijan, 2021. "The cooperation–defection evolution on social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    4. Li, Bin-Quan & Wu, Zhi-Xi & Guan, Jian-Yue, 2022. "Critical thresholds of benefit distribution in an extended snowdrift game model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Qi Su & Lei Zhou & Long Wang, 2019. "Evolutionary multiplayer games on graphs with edge diversity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Yunming Xiao & Bin Wu, 2019. "Close spatial arrangement of mutants favors and disfavors fixation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Benjamin Allen & Christine Sample & Robert Jencks & James Withers & Patricia Steinhagen & Lori Brizuela & Joshua Kolodny & Darren Parke & Gabor Lippner & Yulia A Dementieva, 2020. "Transient amplifiers of selection and reducers of fixation for death-Birth updating on graphs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Liu, Xuesong & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng & Liu, Aizhi, 2019. "Promotion of cooperation in evolutionary game dynamics under asymmetric information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 258-266.
    9. Hendrik Richter, 2020. "Evolution of Cooperation for Multiple Mutant Configurations on All Regular Graphs with N ≤ 14 Players," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Charles G Nathanson & Corina E Tarnita & Martin A Nowak, 2009. "Calculating Evolutionary Dynamics in Structured Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-7, December.
    11. Josef Tkadlec & Andreas Pavlogiannis & Krishnendu Chatterjee & Martin A Nowak, 2020. "Limits on amplifiers of natural selection under death-Birth updating," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Du, Faqi & Fu, Feng, 2013. "Quantifying the impact of noise on macroscopic organization of cooperation in spatial games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 35-44.
    13. Yao Meng & Sean P. Cornelius & Yang-Yu Liu & Aming Li, 2024. "Dynamics of collective cooperation under personalised strategy updates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Han, Jia-Xu & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2023. "Complex interactions promote the frequency of cooperation in snowdrift game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    16. McAvoy, Alex & Fraiman, Nicolas & Hauert, Christoph & Wakeley, John & Nowak, Martin A., 2018. "Public goods games in populations with fluctuating size," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 72-84.
    17. Qiguang An & Hongfeng Guo & Yating Zheng, 2022. "On Robust Stability and Stabilization of Networked Evolutionary Games with Time Delays," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-12, July.
    18. Quan, Ji & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Information fusion based on reputation and payoff promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    19. Kurokawa, Shun, 2019. "How memory cost, switching cost, and payoff non-linearity affect the evolution of persistence," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 174-192.
    20. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Publishing the donation list incompletely promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 48-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:114:y:2018:i:c:p:38-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.