IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v160y2022ics0960077922003782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of donation behavior on the evolution of cooperation in social dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Lulu
  • Pan, Qiuhui
  • He, Mingfeng

Abstract

This article assumes that in the repeated space prisoner's dilemma game, the payoff of each individual in each round consists of game payoff and donation payoff. If individual's game payoff is higher than the donation standard, the payoff that exceeds the donation standard will be donated to the neighbors whose payoff is lower than their own. Through numeric simulation, we conclude that the donation behavior can effectively promote the evolution of cooperation. With the increase of the donation ratio, cooperation appears, and when it reaches a certain value, cooperation is dominant. At this time, increasing the donation intensity will not contribute to the cooperation. Moreover, with every additional increment of the donation ratio, the donation standard also has an impact on the cooperation. The lower the donation standard is, the easier it is to promote the evolution of cooperation. For different parameters, there will be three states: all cooperators, coexistence of cooperators and defectors, and all defectors. In addition, with the increase of donation ratio, the greater the average payoff of all individuals, and the smaller the payoff variance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Lulu & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "The influence of donation behavior on the evolution of cooperation in social dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s0960077922003782
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077922003782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Xiang & Liu, Xingwen, 2021. "Unfixed-neighbor-mechanism promotes cooperation in evolutionary snowdrift game on lattice," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    2. Karandikar, Rajeeva & Mookherjee, Dilip & Ray, Debraj & Vega-Redondo, Fernando, 1998. "Evolving Aspirations and Cooperation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 292-331, June.
    3. Ming-Jian Fu & Han-Xin Yang, 2018. "Stochastic win-stay-lose-learn promotes cooperation in the spatial public goods game," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 29(04), pages 1-8, April.
    4. Liu, Chen & Shi, Juan & Li, Tong & Liu, Jinzhuo, 2019. "Aspiration driven coevolution resolves social dilemmas in networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 247-254.
    5. Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6685), pages 573-577, June.
    6. M.A. Nowak & K. Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring/ The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity," Working Papers ir98040, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    7. He, Zhixue & Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2020. "Evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with extortion strategy under win-stay-lose-move rule," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Li, Ya & Chen, Shanxiong & Niu, Ben, 2018. "Reward depending on public funds stimulates cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 38-45.
    9. Wang, Le & Chen, Tong & Wu, Zhenghong, 2021. "Promoting cooperation by reputation scoring mechanism based on historical donations in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    10. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    11. Zhang, Boyu & An, Xinmiao & Dong, Yali, 2021. "Conditional cooperator enhances institutional punishment in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    12. Zou, Qingsong & Hu, Kaipeng, 2020. "Heterogeneous aspiration resolves social dilemma in structured populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Wang, Qiuling & Ren, Xiaobin & Gao, Bo & Wang, Jiaqian, 2020. "Heterogeneity reproductive ability promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Wang, Jianwei & He, Jialu & Yu, Fengyuan, 2021. "Heterogeneity of reputation increment driven by individual influence promotes cooperation in spatial social dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Xiaojie Chen & Attila Szolnoki, 2018. "Punishment and inspection for governing the commons in a feedback-evolving game," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Seinen, Ingrid & Schram, Arthur, 2006. "Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 581-602, April.
    17. Mao, Deming & Niu, Zhenxi, 2018. "Donation of richer individual can support cooperation in spatial voluntary prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 66-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Shounan & Dai, Jianhua & Zhu, Ge & Guo, Li, 2023. "Investigating the effectiveness of interaction-efficiency-driven strategy updating under progressive-interaction for the evolution of the prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Gao, Lei & Li, Yaotang & Wang, Zhen & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2022. "Asymmetric strategy setup solve the Prisoner’s Dilemma of the evolution of mutualism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 412(C).
    3. Huang, Chaochao & Wang, Chaoqian, 2024. "Memory-based involution dilemma on square lattices," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Bi, Yan & Yang, Hui, 2023. "Based on reputation consistent strategy times promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 444(C).
    5. Isamu Okada, 2020. "A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Cao, Lixuan & Wu, Bin, 2021. "Eco-evolutionary dynamics with payoff-dependent environmental feedback," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Lv, Shaojie & Wang, Xianjia, 2020. "The impact of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in public goods game with exclusion," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    8. Hu, Menglong & Wang, Juan & Kong, Lingcong & An, Kang & Bi, Tao & Guo, Baohong & Dong, Enzeng, 2015. "Incorporating the information from direct and indirect neighbors into fitness evaluation enhances the cooperation in the social dilemmas," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 47-52.
    9. Gaudeul, Alexia & Keser, Claudia & Müller, Stephan, 2021. "The evolution of morals under indirect reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 251-277.
    10. Jin, Jiahua & Shen, Chen & Chu, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Incorporating dominant environment into individual fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoners' dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 70-75.
    11. Danz, David & Engelmann, Dirk & Kübler, Dorothea, 2022. "Do legal standards affect ethical concerns of consumers?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Laura Schmid & Farbod Ekbatani & Christian Hilbe & Krishnendu Chatterjee, 2023. "Quantitative assessment can stabilize indirect reciprocity under imperfect information," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Wang, Zhen & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Leadership by example promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 100-105.
    14. Chen, Ya-Shan & Yang, Han-Xin & Guo, Wen-Zhong & Liu, Geng-Geng, 2018. "Promotion of cooperation based on swarm intelligence in spatial public goods games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 614-620.
    15. Song, Qun & Cao, Zhaoheng & Tao, Rui & Jiang, Wei & Liu, Chen & Liu, Jinzhuo, 2020. "Conditional neutral punishment promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    16. Qian, Jia-Li & Zhou, Yin-Xiang & Hao, Qing-Yi, 2024. "The emergence of cooperative behavior based on random payoff and heterogeneity of concerning social image," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Giangiacomo Bravo & Lucia Tamburino, 2008. "The Evolution of Trust in Non-Simultaneous Exchange Situations," Rationality and Society, , vol. 20(1), pages 85-113, February.
    18. Zhenghong Wu & Huan Huang & Qinghu Liao, 2021. "The study on the role of dedicators on promoting cooperation in public goods game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Servátka, Maros, 2010. "Does generosity generate generosity? An experimental study of reputation effects in a dictator game," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 11-17, January.
    20. Engelmann, Dirk & Fischbacher, Urs, 2009. "Indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 399-407, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:160:y:2022:i:c:s0960077922003782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.