IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v54y2011i1p51-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are business schools doing for business today?

Author

Listed:
  • David, Fred R.
  • David, Meredith E.
  • David, Forest R.

Abstract

This article examines disparity between business school focus and business community needs. A content analysis of 200 corporate job descriptions collected in Fall 2009 revealed 140 specific license/certification/skills commonly cited as required for candidates applying for business jobs. A detailed matching of these post-graduation proficiencies with pre-graduation business major tracks is provided herein to assist schools in better aligning curricula with job requirements. This matching and aligning process is proposed as a key means for reducing disparity between post-graduation licenses/certification/skills required and the academic tracks that are feeders for such positions. Examination of 200 résumés of business students nearing graduation revealed low to no proficiency on the job description-derived skill sets. This finding suggests that disparity between school of business focus and practitioner needs is ongoing and potentially problematic, at least at the institutions sampled. A content analysis of 100 school of business course syllabi and 20 textbooks supported this conclusion. This article provides suggestions for closing the gap between business school curricula and corporate needs. The old business school is compared to our vision of the new business school, where close alignment of pre-graduation training with post-graduation job requirements serves both students and practitioners well.

Suggested Citation

  • David, Fred R. & David, Meredith E. & David, Forest R., 2011. "What are business schools doing for business today?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 51-62.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:54:y:2011:i:1:p:51-62
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681310001229
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dickinson, Roger & Herbst, Anthony & O'Shaughnessy, John, 1983. "What are business schools doing for business?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 46-51.
    2. Ellson, Tony, 2009. "Assessing contribution of research in business to practice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1160-1164, November.
    3. Beatty, Bernard L. & Lamy, Robert E. & Peacock, Peter R. & Saladin, Brooke A., 1996. "The faculty-in-residence program," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 55-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montserrat Entrialgo & Víctor Iglesias & Frank Müller, 2019. "Are European Part-Time MBA Programs Designed to Foster Entrepreneurial Minds? An Exploratory Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Cotton, John L. & Stewart, Alex, 2013. "Evaluate your business school's writings as if your strategy matters," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 323-331.
    3. Meredith E. David & Fred R. David & Forest R. David, 2021. "Closing the Gap between Graduates’ Skills and Employers’ Requirements: A Focus on the Strategic Management Capstone Business Course," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Aaltola, Pasi & Manninen, Ari, 2021. "Drawing the premises for personalized learning: Illustrations of management and accounting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David, Fred R. & David, Meredith E. & David, Forest R., 2011. "What are business schools doing for business today?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 51-62, January.
    2. Hesping, Frank Henrik & Schiele, Holger, 2016. "Matching tactical sourcing levers with the Kraljič matrix: Empirical evidence on purchasing portfolios," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 101-117.
    3. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan, 2011. "Consortium benchmarking: Collaborative academic-practitioner case study research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1137-1145, October.
    4. Amara, Nabil & Halilem, Norrin & Traoré, Namatié, 2016. "Adding value to companies' value chain: Role of business schools scholars," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1661-1668.
    5. Geuens, Maggie, 2011. "Where does business research go from here? Food-for-thought on academic papers in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1104-1107, October.
    6. Davis, Donna F. & Golicic, Susan L. & Boerstler, Courtney N. & Choi, Sunny & Oh, Hanmo, 2013. "Does marketing research suffer from methods myopia?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1245-1250.
    7. Gill, Seerat Kaur & Dhir, Amandeep & Singh, Gurparkash & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Transformative Quality in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs): Conceptualisation, scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 275-286.
    8. Marc J. F. Wouters & Karel H. van Donselaar, 2000. "Design of Operations Management Internships Across Organizations—Learning OM by Doing OM," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 81-93, August.
    9. Santini, Cristina & Marinelli, Elisabetta & Boden, Mark & Cavicchi, Alessio & Haegeman, Karel, 2016. "Reducing the distance between thinkers and doers in the entrepreneurial discovery process: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1840-1844.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:54:y:2011:i:1:p:51-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.