IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v177y2016icp101-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Matching tactical sourcing levers with the Kraljič matrix: Empirical evidence on purchasing portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Hesping, Frank Henrik
  • Schiele, Holger

Abstract

Purchasing portfolio models, above all the Kraljič matrix, are widely adopted to recommend generic strategies and tactics for different categories of purchases. However, little has been done to empirically validate if conceptual and normative recommendations hold true. Does the application of tactical sourcing levers vary according to ‘strategic importance’ and ‘supply risk’ and, if so, how? To answer this question, data from a survey has been used to classify 107 sourcing projects of direct products into the non-critical, leverage, bottleneck and strategic quadrants of the Kraljič matrix and to compare and contrast the profile of applied tactical sourcing levers in each quadrant. As a major contribution, this study draws on the knowledge of ‘front-line’ purchasing agents to show that, in practice, the full range of tactical sourcing levers is used in each of the four quadrants of the Kraljič matrix. Based on the study's findings, we advocate moving away from a strict adherence to a limited number of recommended tactics in each quadrant of the Kraljič matrix. Purchasers in practice use a mix of all tactical sourcing levers in all portfolio quadrants. Rather than being viewed as alternatives, tactical sourcing levers are used in an additive way in practice. The Kraljič matrix may more usefully be conceptualized as a medium for debate and dialogue rather than providing mutually exclusive prescriptions to choosing the right tactical approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Hesping, Frank Henrik & Schiele, Holger, 2016. "Matching tactical sourcing levers with the Kraljič matrix: Empirical evidence on purchasing portfolios," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 101-117.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:177:y:2016:i:c:p:101-117
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527316300366
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan, 2011. "Consortium benchmarking: Collaborative academic-practitioner case study research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1137-1145, October.
    2. Holger Schiele & Richard Calvi & Michael Gibbert, 2012. "Customer attractiveness, supplier satisfaction and preferred customer status: Introduction, definitions and an overarching framework," Post-Print hal-00948480, HAL.
    3. Karjalainen, Katri & Salmi, Asta, 2013. "Continental differences in purchasing strategies and tools," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 112-125.
    4. Paul Shrivastava, 1987. "Rigor and practical usefulness of research in strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 77-92, January.
    5. Hallikas, Jukka & Karvonen, Iris & Pulkkinen, Urho & Virolainen, Veli-Matti & Tuominen, Markku, 2004. "Risk management processes in supplier networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 47-58, July.
    6. Ellson, Tony, 2009. "Assessing contribution of research in business to practice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1160-1164, November.
    7. Romano, Pietro & Formentini, Marco, 2012. "Designing and implementing open book accounting in buyer–supplier dyads: A framework for supplier selection and motivation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 68-83.
    8. Srinivasan, Narasimhan & Ratchford, Brian T, 1991. "An Empirical Test of a Model of External Search for Automobiles," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 233-242, September.
    9. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra & Paula Caligiuri & Ulf Andersson & Mary Yoko Brannen, 2013. "From the Editors: How to write articles that are relevant to practice," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 44(4), pages 285-289, May.
    10. Knight, Louise & Tu, Yi-Hsi & Preston, Jude, 2014. "Integrating skills profiling and purchasing portfolio management: An opportunity for building purchasing capability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 271-283.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuwei Jing & Kaixuan Hou & Junai Yan & Zih-Ping Ho & Lu Han, 2021. "Investigating the effect of value stream mapping on procurement effectiveness: a case study," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 935-946, April.
    2. Trautrims, Alexander & MacCarthy, Bart L. & Okade, Chetan, 2017. "Building an innovation-based supplier portfolio: The use of patent analysis in strategic supplier selection in the automotive sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 228-236.
    3. Ekström, Thomas & Hilletofth, Per & Skoglund, Per, 2021. "Towards a purchasing portfolio model for defence procurement – A Delphi study of Swedish defence authorities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Remko van Hoek, 2020. "Responding to COVID-19 Supply Chain Risks—Insights from Supply Chain Change Management, Total Cost of Ownership and Supplier Segmentation Theory," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Arantes, Amílcar & Alhais, Andreia Frias & Ferreira, Luis Miguel D.F., 2022. "Application of a purchasing portfolio model to define medicine purchasing strategies: An empirical study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Qiao, Crystal, 2019. "Out-in, in-out buyer quality innovation pathways for new product outcome: Empirical evidence from the Chinese consumer goods industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 183-194.
    2. Abdelkader Daghfous & Omar Belkhodja, 2019. "Managing Talent Loss in the Procurement Function: Insights from the Hospitality Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Nico D. A. Steenstra & Cees J. Gelderman & Jos M. C. Schijns & Janjaap Semeijn, 2019. "Supplier Contribution To Buyer Innovativeness: The Influence Of Customer Attractiveness And Strategic Fit," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan, 2011. "Consortium benchmarking: Collaborative academic-practitioner case study research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1137-1145, October.
    5. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan & Hoffmann, Petra & Kowalski, Rita, 2022. "The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 280-296.
    6. Schauerte, Nico & Becker, Maren & Imschloss, Monika & Wichmann, Julian R.K. & Reinartz, Werner J., 2023. "The managerial relevance of marketing science: Properties and genesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 801-822.
    7. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    8. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    9. Blomstermo, Anders & Eriksson, Kent & Lindstrand, Angelika & Sharma, D. Deo, 2004. "The perceived usefulness of network experiential knowledge in the internationalizing firm," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 355-373.
    10. Antonella La Rocca & Ivan Snehota, 2021. "Mobilizing suppliers when starting up a new business venture," Post-Print hal-03328945, HAL.
    11. Richard J. Arend & Moren Lévesque, 2010. "Is the Resource-Based View a Practical Organizational Theory?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 913-930, August.
    12. Claudia Seabra & Luis Filipe Lages & Jose Luis Abrantes, 2003. "The infosource scale: a measure to assess the importance of external tourism information sources," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp440, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    13. Teo, Thompson S. H. & Yeong, Yon Ding, 2003. "Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 349-363, October.
    14. Cambra-Fierro, Jesús & Polo-Redondo, Yolanda & Trifu, Andreea, 2021. "Short-term and long-term effects of touchpoints on customer perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    15. Singh, Sonika & Ratchford, Brian T. & Prasad, Ashutosh, 2014. "Offline and Online Search in Used Durables Markets," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 301-320.
    16. Kwon, Kyoung-Nan & Lee, Jinkook, 2009. "The effects of reference point, knowledge, and risk propensity on the evaluation of financial products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 719-725, July.
    17. Hatem Elleuch & Wafik Hachicha & Habib Chabchoub, 2014. "A combined approach for supply chain risk management: description and application to a real hospital pharmaceutical case study," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 641-663, May.
    18. Chen, Jen-Yi & Baddam, Swathi R., 2015. "The effect of unethical behavior and learning on strategic supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 74-87.
    19. Jittamai, Phongchai & Boonyanusith, Wijai, 2014. "Risk Assessment in Managing the Blood Supply Chain," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18, volume 18, pages 447-468, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    20. Brillinger, Anne-Sophie & Els, Christian & Schäfer, Björn & Bender, Beate, 2020. "Business model risk and uncertainty factors: Toward building and maintaining profitable and sustainable business models," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 121-130.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:177:y:2016:i:c:p:101-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.