IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v86y2009i5p657-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility study of cogeneration in a plywood industry with power export to grid

Author

Listed:
  • Mujeebu, M.A.
  • Jayaraj, S.
  • Ashok, S.
  • Abdullah, M.Z.
  • Khalil, M.

Abstract

Cogeneration is proved to be one of the promising energy management techniques, which offers an efficient method of producing electricity and useful thermal energy from a common source. In the present study various cogeneration options for a plywood industry in south India with power export is analyzed. It is found that the industry has a good potential for cogeneration. Three schemes such as steam turbine gas turbine and combined cycle are evaluated on the basis of Annualized Life Cycle Cost (ALCC). The steam turbine based cogeneration is found to be the best option as it has the least ALCC. The comparison was based on lean gas as fuel but the industry can save the fuel cost by utilizing the waste wood available which enhances the scope and economic feasibility of cogeneration. It is found that the proposed scheme can provide a tremendous saving in the annual operating cost compared to the existing facility with a payback period of 2.6 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Mujeebu, M.A. & Jayaraj, S. & Ashok, S. & Abdullah, M.Z. & Khalil, M., 2009. "Feasibility study of cogeneration in a plywood industry with power export to grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(5), pages 657-662, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:86:y:2009:i:5:p:657-662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306-2619(08)00163-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang, O. & Mohanty, B., 1996. "Industrial energy efficiency improvement through cogeneration: A case study of the textile industry in Thailand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 21(12), pages 1169-1178.
    2. Oh, Si-Doek & Oh, Hoo-Suk & Kwak, Ho-Young, 2007. "Economic evaluation for adoption of cogeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 266-278, March.
    3. de Holanda, Marcelo R. & Balestieri, José A. Perrella, 1999. "Cogeneration in a solid-wastes power-station: a case-study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 125-139, June.
    4. Uran, V., 2006. "Optimization system for combined heat and electricity production in the wood-processing industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2996-3016.
    5. Salem Szklo, Alexandre & Borghetti Soares, Jeferson & Tiomno Tolmasquim, Maurício, 2000. "Economic potential of natural gas-fired cogeneration in Brazil: two case studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 245-263, November.
    6. Möllersten, K. & Yan, J. & Westermark, M., 2003. "Potential and cost-effectiveness of CO2 reductions through energy measures in Swedish pulp and paper mills," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 691-710.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiménez-Espadafor Aguilar, Francisco & García, Miguel Torres & Trujillo, Elisa Carvajal & Becerra Villanueva, José Antonio & Florencio Ojeda, Francisco J., 2011. "Prediction of performance, energy savings and increase in profitability of two gas turbine steam generator cogeneration plant, based on experimental data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 742-754.
    2. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2014. "Modeling of trigeneration configurations based on biomass gasification and comparison of performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 845-856.
    3. John Foster & Liam Wagner & Phil Wild & Junhua Zhao & Lucas Skoofa & Craig Froome, 2011. "Market and Economic Modelling of the Intelligent Grid: End of Year Report 2009," Energy Economics and Management Group Working Papers 09, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    4. Shnaiderman, Matan & Keren, Nir, 2014. "Cogeneration versus natural gas steam boiler: A techno-economic model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 128-138.
    5. Lian, Z.T. & Chua, K.J. & Chou, S.K., 2010. "A thermoeconomic analysis of biomass energy for trigeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 84-95, January.
    6. Fitzpatrick, John J. & Dooley, Paul, 2017. "Holistic view of CO2 reduction potential from energy use by an individual processing company," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 336-343.
    7. Manuel Raul Pelaez-Samaniego & Juan L. Espinoza & José Jara-Alvear & Pablo Arias-Reyes & Fernando Maldonado-Arias & Patricia Recalde-Galindo & Pablo Rosero & Tsai Garcia-Perez, 2020. "Potential and Impacts of Cogeneration in Tropical Climate Countries: Ecuador as a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Turan, Onder & Aydin, Hakan, 2014. "Exergetic and exergo-economic analyses of an aero-derivative gas turbine engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 638-650.
    9. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2013. "Development and assessment of an integrated biomass-based multi-generation energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 155-166.
    10. Shaaban, M. & Azit, A.H. & Nor, K.M., 2011. "Grid integration policies of gas-fired cogeneration in Peninsular Malaysia: Fallacies and counterexamples," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5063-5075, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sunil, & Sinha, Rahul & Chaitanya, Bathina & Rajan, Birendra Kumar & Agarwal, Anurag & Thakur, Ajay D. & Raj, Rishi, 2019. "Design, fabrication, and performance evaluation of a novel biomass-gasification-based hot water generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 148-157.
    2. Lai, Sau Man & Hui, Chi Wai, 2009. "Feasibility and flexibility for a trigeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1693-1704.
    3. Uran, Vedran & Krajcar, Slavko, 2009. "Feed-in tariff and market electricity price comparison: The case of cogeneration units in Croatia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 844-849, March.
    4. Lisa Branchini & Maria Chiara Bignozzi & Benedetta Ferrari & Barbara Mazzanti & Saverio Ottaviano & Marcello Salvio & Claudia Toro & Fabrizio Martini & Andrea Canetti, 2021. "Cogeneration Supporting the Energy Transition in the Italian Ceramic Tile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Schmidt, Johannes & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Kindermann, Georg & Schmid, Erwin, 2010. "Cost-effective CO2 emission reduction through heat, power and biofuel production from woody biomass: A spatially explicit comparison of conversion technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2128-2141, July.
    6. Yang, F. & Meerman, J.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2021. "Carbon capture and biomass in industry: A techno-economic analysis and comparison of negative emission options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun, 2010. "A MILP model for integrated plan and evaluation of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 1001-1014, March.
    8. Szklo, Alexandre Salem & Soares, Jeferson Borghetti & Tolmasquim, Mauricio Tiomno, 2004. "Economic potential of natural gas-fired cogeneration--analysis of Brazil's chemical industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1415-1428, August.
    9. Marshman, D.J. & Chmelyk, T. & Sidhu, M.S. & Gopaluni, R.B. & Dumont, G.A., 2010. "Energy optimization in a pulp and paper mill cogeneration facility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3514-3525, November.
    10. Joelsson, J.M. & Gustavsson, L., 2008. "CO2 emission and oil use reduction through black liquor gasification and energy efficiency in pulp and paper industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 747-763.
    11. Lyrio de Oliveira, Lucas & García Kerdan, Iván & de Oliveira Ribeiro, Celma & Oller do Nascimento, Claudio Augusto & Rego, Erik Eduardo & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam, 2020. "Modelling the technical potential of bioelectricity production under land use constraints: A multi-region Brazil case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    12. Carpaneto, Enrico & Chicco, Gianfranco & Mancarella, Pierluigi & Russo, Angela, 2011. "Cogeneration planning under uncertainty: Part I: Multiple time frame approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1059-1067, April.
    13. Oh, Si-Doek & Kim, Ki-Young & Oh, Shuk-Bum & Kwak, Ho-Young, 2012. "Optimal operation of a 1-kW PEMFC-based CHP system for residential applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 93-101.
    14. Peng, Lihong & Zeng, Xiaoling & Wang, Yejun & Hong, Gui-Bing, 2015. "Analysis of energy efficiency and carbon dioxide reduction in the Chinese pulp and paper industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 65-75.
    15. Broeren, M.L.M. & Saygin, D. & Patel, M.K., 2014. "Forecasting global developments in the basic chemical industry for environmental policy analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 273-287.
    16. Pruitt, Kristopher A. & Braun, Robert J. & Newman, Alexandra M., 2013. "Establishing conditions for the economic viability of fuel cell-based, combined heat and power distributed generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 904-920.
    17. Raj, N. Thilak & Iniyan, S. & Goic, Ranko, 2011. "A review of renewable energy based cogeneration technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3640-3648.
    18. Fleiter, Tobias & Fehrenbach, Daniel & Worrell, Ernst & Eichhammer, Wolfgang, 2012. "Energy efficiency in the German pulp and paper industry – A model-based assessment of saving potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 84-99.
    19. Haibin Cao & Peng Jiang & Ming Zeng, 2021. "A Novel Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of IEGES Based on the TOPSIS Optimized by MEE Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Josefine Rasmussen, 2020. "The Role of Structural Context in Making Business Sense of Investments for Sustainability–A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:86:y:2009:i:5:p:657-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.