IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v37y2009i3p844-849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feed-in tariff and market electricity price comparison: The case of cogeneration units in Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Uran, Vedran
  • Krajcar, Slavko

Abstract

In August 2007, the Government of the Republic of Croatia instituted a feed-in tariff system, requiring the Croatian Electricity Market Operator (HROTE) to off-take the electricity produced from renewable energy sources or cogeneration units fueled by natural gas. Analysis of the off-take electricity price range, which depends on the net electrical output and electricity market trends, indicates that it is more cost effective for cogeneration units greater than 1Â MW to sell their electricity on the exchange market. This was confirmed by developing a mathematical model to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio of a cogeneration unit. This ratio represents the relation between the profit spread, i.e. the difference between the profit generated from selling the electricity on the exchange market and the profit made from dispatching the electricity to HROTE, as well as the total investment costs. The model can be applied for changes in certain parameters, such as the net electrical output, volatility and spot electricity price. The Monte Carlo method is used to obtain the most probable cost-effectiveness ratio and average future electricity price. Together with these two economic parameters and market price analysis, it is possible to calculate and calibrate an acceptable off-take electricity price.

Suggested Citation

  • Uran, Vedran & Krajcar, Slavko, 2009. "Feed-in tariff and market electricity price comparison: The case of cogeneration units in Croatia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 844-849, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:3:p:844-849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(08)00576-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uran, V., 2006. "Optimization system for combined heat and electricity production in the wood-processing industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2996-3016.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Westner, Günther & Madlener, Reinhard, 2010. "The benefit of regional diversification of cogeneration investments in Europe: A mean-variance portfolio analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7911-7920, December.
    2. Jiménez-Espadafor Aguilar, Francisco & García, Miguel Torres & Trujillo, Elisa Carvajal & Becerra Villanueva, José Antonio & Florencio Ojeda, Francisco J., 2011. "Prediction of performance, energy savings and increase in profitability of two gas turbine steam generator cogeneration plant, based on experimental data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 742-754.
    3. Chung, Mo & Park, Chuhwan & Lee, Sukgyu & Park, Hwa-Choon & Im, Yong-Hoon & Chang, Youngho, 2012. "A decision support assessment of cogeneration plant for a community energy system in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 365-383.
    4. Radulovic, Dusko & Skok, Srdjan & Kirincic, Vedran, 2012. "Cogeneration – Investment dilemma," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 177-187.
    5. Azadian, Farshad & Radzi, M.A.M., 2013. "A general approach toward building integrated photovoltaic systems and its implementation barriers: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 527-538.
    6. Liou, Hwa Meei, 2015. "Comparing feed-in tariff incentives in Taiwan and Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1021-1034.
    7. Ramli, Makbul A.M. & Twaha, Ssennoga, 2015. "Analysis of renewable energy feed-in tariffs in selected regions of the globe: Lessons for Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 649-661.
    8. Bernice Magro & Simon Paul Borg, 2023. "A Feasibility Study on CHP Systems for Hotels in the Maltese Islands: A Comparative Analysis Based on Hotels’ Star Rating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiménez-Espadafor Aguilar, Francisco & García, Miguel Torres & Trujillo, Elisa Carvajal & Becerra Villanueva, José Antonio & Florencio Ojeda, Francisco J., 2011. "Prediction of performance, energy savings and increase in profitability of two gas turbine steam generator cogeneration plant, based on experimental data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 742-754.
    2. Cortés, E. & Rivera, W., 2010. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic optimization of a cogeneration pulp and paper mill plant including the use of a heat transformer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1289-1299.
    3. Turan, Onder & Aydin, Hakan, 2014. "Exergetic and exergo-economic analyses of an aero-derivative gas turbine engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 638-650.
    4. Fitzpatrick, John J. & Dooley, Paul, 2017. "Holistic view of CO2 reduction potential from energy use by an individual processing company," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 336-343.
    5. Mujeebu, M.A. & Jayaraj, S. & Ashok, S. & Abdullah, M.Z. & Khalil, M., 2009. "Feasibility study of cogeneration in a plywood industry with power export to grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(5), pages 657-662, May.
    6. Bazmi, Aqeel Ahmed & Zahedi, Gholamreza, 2011. "Sustainable energy systems: Role of optimization modeling techniques in power generation and supply—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3480-3500.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:3:p:844-849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.